Sean Busbey created HBASE-13570:
---
Summary: hbase daemon foreground start command executes output of
ulimit
Key: HBASE-13570
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13570
Project: HBase
Here is my +1 for the RC.
Checked sigs, crcs,
Checked layout, jars
Checked the book
Run local mode
Run on a 5 node cluster
Run smoke test, simple shell commands
Run LTT with 1M and different encodings / compression
Run ITBLL, wrote 100M nodes
Test with 1.0.0 and 0.98.12 clients
Thanks Ted and Jos
I ran the same command.
Small tests from various modules were run.
And then I saw this:
Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.thrift.TestThriftServer
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 76.163 sec
- in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.thrift.TestThriftServer
The above test is a large
Sure thing.
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Build Order:
[INFO]
[INFO] HBase
[INFO] HBase - Checkstyle
[INFO] HBase - Annotations
[INFO] HBase - Protocol
[INFO] HBase - Common
[INFO] HBase - Procedure
[I
Can you run
mvn -PrunSmallTests help:active-profiles
--
Sean
On Apr 26, 2015 2:48 PM, "Nick Dimiduk" wrote:
> Running {{mvn test -PrunSmallTests}} is running Medium and Large unit tests
> as well. Anyone else seeing this behavior? Maybe this is just something
> weird about my checkout?
>
> -n
Running {{mvn test -PrunSmallTests}} is running Medium and Large unit tests
as well. Anyone else seeing this behavior? Maybe this is just something
weird about my checkout?
-n
Gabor Liptak created HBASE-13569:
Summary: correct errors reported with mvn site
Key: HBASE-13569
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13569
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Devs --
Branch-1.1 is officially closed for feature enhancements, with the
following exceptions: HBASE-11339, HBASE-13260, HBASE-13431.
Please limit commits to blocker and critical bug fixes. I also ask that you
please ping me as patches go in, so that I might review them in relation to
the testi
I spoke with a couple of our HDFS folks on Friday, they sound confident
that 2.7.1 will be considered production-stable. I think we can try bumping
master to 2.7.1 when it's out.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Elliott Clark wrote:
>
> >
A second thought on this. I wonder how it is going to work. The test suite
probably will run with old Jackson version with the compile. We will ship
what we don't test with?
Whatever we do seem to imply similarly small risk ...
On Apr 25, 2015 8:02 PM, "Nick Dimiduk" wrote:
> I'm game for giving
10 matches
Mail list logo