>> I thought I was reviewing a patch that was against master
Yes, it was against master. We used to develop in HBASE-7912 branch, but it
was abandoned 6-8 mo ago.
This is why the only way to merge backup is to apply v61 directly to master
branch.
-Vlad
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Stack wr
How about the idea of HBase having base implementations for common
interfaces? That would often help applications built on top of HBase to
maintain backward compatibility from release to release.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:38 PM Stack wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Duo Zhang wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Duo Zhang wrote:
> There are some comments in https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/HBASE-17584
> .
>
> In HBASE-17584, we want to remove Scan.getScanMetrics and move the method
> to ResultScanner which is an interface and part of our public API.
>
> In our r
There are some comments in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17584
.
In HBASE-17584, we want to remove Scan.getScanMetrics and move the method
to ResultScanner which is an interface and part of our public API.
In our refguide, it is clear that we can do this for a major release.
And fo
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Thanks for the vote, Josh.
>
> So far there have been 3 +1's (Enis', mine and Josh's)
>
> Should we start another thread on the procedure of merging or use this
> thread ?
> Background:
> HBASE-7912 branch is way out of date.
> Latest rounds of meg
Clarification:
Due to the divergence of HBASE-7912 branch from master branch, I think the
conclusion of this vote means that mega patch v61 on HBASE-14123 would be
integrated to master branch directly (with credit to people who
contributed).
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Thank
Duo Zhang created HBASE-17793:
-
Summary: Backport ScanResultCache related code to branch-1
Key: HBASE-17793
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17793
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Sub-t
Thanks for the vote, Josh.
So far there have been 3 +1's (Enis', mine and Josh's)
Should we start another thread on the procedure of merging or use this
thread ?
Background:
HBASE-7912 branch is way out of date.
Latest rounds of mega patch were based on then-current master branch.
Thanks
On Wed
+1
(non-binding)
- Downloaded the src tarball.
- Checked the md5 and signature. Looks good.
- Built from source. openjdk version "1.8.0_121"
- Ran unit test suite twice. All passed.
- mvn apache-rat:check Passed
- Download the bin tarball.
- Checked the md5 and signature. Lo
huaxiang sun created HBASE-17792:
Summary: Use a shared thread pool for AtomicityWriter,
AtomicGetReader, AtomicScanReader's connections in TestAcidGuarantees
Key: HBASE-17792
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
Spent the day playing around with this on 6 nodes.
I've found some rough edges: some known (the docs blocker Vlad pointed
out) and some that I think are unknown (tooling is rough -- partially
from wrong help messages and, I think, changes in design like
Master-submitted MR jobs).
But, Stack'
Lars George created HBASE-17791:
---
Summary: Locality should not be affected for non-faulty region
servers at startup
Key: HBASE-17791
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17791
Project: HBase
I'm excited to announce that the 2nd Annual Apache Phoenix conference,
PhoenixCon 2017 will take place the day after HBaseCon in San Francisco on
Tuesday, June 13th from 10:30am-6pm. For more details, including to RSVP
and submit a talk proposal, click here:
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/phoenixcon-
If I remember from the jira, it got stuck on perf testing the different
approaches of incrementing the histograms inline versus using a
multi-producer single consumer queue (blockingQueue, or Disruptor, etc),
and emitting the metrics inline and updating the histograms from a
background thread. Whic
Build status: Successful
If successful, the website and docs have been generated. To update the live
site, follow the instructions below. If failed, skip to the bottom of this
email.
Use the following commands to download the patch and apply it to a clean branch
based on origin/asf-site. If yo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Latham resolved HBASE-15339.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Improve DateTieredCompactionPolicy
> --
>
>
Guanghao Zhang created HBASE-17790:
--
Summary: Mark ReplicationAdmin's peerAdded and
listReplicationPeers as Deprecated
Key: HBASE-17790
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17790
Project:
17 matches
Mail list logo