Many congratulations, Josh, Jing Chen He and Eshcar !!!
-Original Message-
From: saint@gmail.com [mailto:saint@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
Sent: 17 March 2017 11:07
To: HBase Dev List
Subject: ANNOUNCE: Good news Two new PMC and a new Committer!
Josh Elser and Jing Chen (Je
Phil Yang created HBASE-17795:
-
Summary: Async ReplicationEndpoint
Key: HBASE-17795
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17795
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components
Josh Elser and Jing Chen (Jerry) have both been added to the HBase PMC.
These lads have been stellar helping the project along; Jerry for a good
few years now and Josh, though less time served, has made up for the lack
with style. It makes sense that they be made PMCers!
Let me take this opportuni
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Vladimir Rodionov
wrote:
> v61 is against current master.
>
>
It was what I thought. I got confused by the hijacker.
St.Ack
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Stack wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Vladimir Rodionov <
> > vladrodio...@gmail.com>
+1 on allow adding methods to interfaces in minor release, especially
before 2.0 is out, I don't think a minor release is that "minor" (smile).
Regarding refguide, shall we also remind user to check the "incompatible"
changes in release note before upgrading for minor version?
Best Regards,
Yu
O
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Yu reopened HBASE-17707:
> New More Accurate Table Skew cost function/generator
>
>
This sounds like a good result to me.
We've sometimes provided BaseXXX implementations of interfaces for Java <=
7 but haven't been consistent. Would be good to do better.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Stack wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
>
> > +1 to the JDK8 de
Josh Elser created HBASE-17794:
--
Summary: Remove lingering "violation" in favor of the accurate
"snapshot"
Key: HBASE-17794
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17794
Project: HBase
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> +1 to the JDK8 default implementation approach. I'd say this would be good
> to push forward for the future.
>
> For 1.x, I see no reason why we couldn't provide concrete implementations
> as a stop-gap. Identifying and creating those classes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh Elser resolved HBASE-17525.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Making the call that we'll not include this -- the "standard" path forward
s
+1 to what Josh and James said.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> +1 to the JDK8 default implementation approach. I'd say this would be good
> to push forward for the future.
>
> For 1.x, I see no reason why we couldn't provide concrete implementations
> as a stop-gap. Identi
+1 for the wording in the book. Otherwise, we cannot add methods to Table /
Admin in a minor release, which is very restricting.
> How about the idea of HBase having base implementations for common
interfaces
This is only needed in JDK-7, so basically in 1.x releases. With Java-8, we
are doing def
+1 to the JDK8 default implementation approach. I'd say this would be
good to push forward for the future.
For 1.x, I see no reason why we couldn't provide concrete
implementations as a stop-gap. Identifying and creating those classes is
probably the biggest barrier :). I don't think anything
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh Elser resolved HBASE-17789.
Resolution: Invalid
> ZKConfig.getZKQuorumServersStringFromHbaseConfig creates a incorrect zkquorum
v61 is against current master.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Stack wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Vladimir Rodionov <
> vladrodio...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > >> I thought I was reviewing a patch that was against master
> >
> > Yes, it was against master. We used to develop in HBA
Build status: Successful
If successful, the website and docs have been generated. To update the live
site, follow the instructions below. If failed, skip to the bottom of this
email.
Use the following commands to download the patch and apply it to a clean branch
based on origin/asf-site. If yo
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Vladimir Rodionov
wrote:
> >> I thought I was reviewing a patch that was against master
>
> Yes, it was against master. We used to develop in HBASE-7912 branch, but it
> was abandoned 6-8 mo ago.
> This is why the only way to merge backup is to apply v61 directly
JIRA creation is done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17791
I will have a look into it over the next few days, maybe I can come up
with a patch.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Stack wrote:
> File a blocker please Lars. I'm pretty sure the boolean on whether we are
> doing a recove
18 matches
Mail list logo
