[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack resolved HBASE-19085.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Thanks [~ram_krish] ... [~chia7712] already noticed this. Just committed an
addendum .
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan created HBASE-19085:
--
Summary: Fix findbug EQ_OVERRIDING_EQUALS_NOT_SYMMETRIC warning
Key: HBASE-19085
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19085
Project: HB
sure here's the hadoop thread:
https://s.apache.org/azOi
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> Could you share the reference to the hdfs changes or discussion?
>
> On 2017-10-25 02:06, Sean Busbey wrote:
>> hi folks!
>>
>> FYI, the Hadoop folks have identified that some rec
Could you share the reference to the hdfs changes or discussion?
On 2017-10-25 02:06, Sean Busbey wrote:
> hi folks!
>
> FYI, the Hadoop folks have identified that some recent changes to HDFS
> have been eating all memory on hosts where their tests run. So that
> might be the culprit in our re
+1 for not allowing flush/compaction CPs to do bypass. So which all
pre hooks to support bypass now? Some mutations related only? If u
have a list pls post. Better to add in HBASE-18770 jira
-Anoop-
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Stack wrote:
> I made a start on HBASE-18770. It has edit o
I made a start on HBASE-18770. It has edit of RegionObserver which denotes
methods that support bypass (Unfortunately, because of the varied
signatures, how bypass is signaled varies too). Would appreciate a
once-over.
of note, a CP cannot bypass flush. Speak up if you think otherwise (or you
can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Yu resolved HBASE-16885.
Resolution: Won't Fix
There have been many changes in API, making this obsolete.
> Deprecate public classe
+1 IMO, go for it -- enough eyes have been had on the last little bit.
On 10/24/17 11:05 PM, stack wrote:
The boys are almost ready to merge. They were going to run a VOTE. I told
them not to bother. There is enough support behind the merge they don't
need a vote IMO. If you think otherwise, spe
Hey Appy,
I think Enis essentially copied what I was originally trying to do. Up
in Avatica[1], I made a similar API Maven module which just had
interfaces. The implementation was them split up into a different module
to avoid the implementation details of the API (specifically, using
Dropwiz
The boys are almost ready to merge. They were going to run a VOTE. I told
them not to bother. There is enough support behind the merge they don't
need a vote IMO. If you think otherwise, speak up.
Thanks,
St.Ack
P.S. Release note on HBASE-18410 will have summary of changes that come in
on the mer
Hey Elliott, good to see you around :)
Btw, this is new stuff added in HBASE-9774 which was committed to only 2.0.
Made it to 1.4 too later (HBASE-18060).
-- Appy
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Elliott Clark wrote:
> The weird module dance with reflection came from needing to extend inner
>
The weird module dance with reflection came from needing to extend inner
hadoop classes on multiple different versions. This was back when HBase had
to support hadoop < 1, hadoop 1.x, and hadoop 2.x. When we dropped older
hadoop versions then things got easier.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Ape
Hi
Am confused why do we have this weird circular dependency between the two
modules: hbase-metrics-api & hbase-metrics. And since maven doesn't allow
it explicitly, this was tucked and hidden by using reflection?
MetricRegistriesImpl[hbase-metrics] implements
MetricRegistries[hbase-metrics-api].
Chatting with my coworker Mr. Mike Drob, we were batting back and forth
what remains to be done. Surfacing our thoughts here so you all clued
inOr if you think otherwise, please speak up.
We have ~13 issues to land:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12341594 About two
are
hi folks!
FYI, the Hadoop folks have identified that some recent changes to HDFS
have been eating all memory on hosts where their tests run. So that
might be the culprit in our recent spat of new odd looking surefire
failures.
Yetus is working to add in some guard rails to keep Hadoop from doing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Busbey resolved HBASE-19049.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Release Note: HBase now relies on Kerby version 1.0.1 for its test
enviro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Busbey reopened HBASE-19049:
-
> Update kerby to 1.0.1 GA release
>
>
> Key: HBASE-
Mike Drob created HBASE-19084:
-
Summary: precommit should have a check for commit id in the commit
message
Key: HBASE-19084
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19084
Project: HBase
Congratulations Zheng!!
--
Srinivas Reddy
http://mrsrinivas.com/
(Sent via gmail web)
On 24 October 2017 at 16:23, Abhishek Singh Chouhan <
abhishekchouhan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congrats Zheng!!
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Yu Li wrote:
>
> > Congratulations and welcome!
> >
> > B
Congrats Zheng!!
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Yu Li wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome!
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> On 24 October 2017 at 14:59, Misty Stanley-Jones wrote:
>
> > Welcome Zheng Hu and thanks for your contributions to the project!
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:18 PM Duo
Congratulations and welcome!
Best Regards,
Yu
On 24 October 2017 at 14:59, Misty Stanley-Jones wrote:
> Welcome Zheng Hu and thanks for your contributions to the project!
>
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 11:18 PM Duo Zhang wrote:
>
> > On behalf of the Apache HBase PMC, I am pleased to announce tha
Duo Zhang created HBASE-19083:
-
Summary: Introduce a new log writer which can write to two HDFSes
Key: HBASE-19083
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19083
Project: HBase
Issue Type
Duo Zhang created HBASE-19081:
-
Summary: Implement a procedure to convert RS from S to DA
Key: HBASE-19081
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19081
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Sub-ta
Duo Zhang created HBASE-19082:
-
Summary: Implement a procedure to convert RS from DA to S
Key: HBASE-19082
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19082
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Sub-ta
Duo Zhang created HBASE-19080:
-
Summary: Implement a procedure to convert RS from A to DA
Key: HBASE-19080
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19080
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Sub-ta
Duo Zhang created HBASE-19079:
-
Summary: Implement a procedure to convert normal RS to state DA
Key: HBASE-19079
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19079
Project: HBase
Issue Type:
Duo Zhang created HBASE-19078:
-
Summary: Introduce a new replication peer type for synchronous
replication
Key: HBASE-19078
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19078
Project: HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chia-Ping Tsai resolved HBASE-18751.
Resolution: Fixed
> Revisit the TimeRange and TimeRangeTracker
> --
Thanks Stack. Started working on it. Will post a patch ASAP.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Stack wrote:
> That'd be a good one to get in Ram.
> S
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:42 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Stack
> >
> > Do you want HBASE-18
29 matches
Mail list logo