[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-20533) Fix the flaky TestAssignmentManagerMetrics

2018-05-29 Thread Zheng Hu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Zheng Hu resolved HBASE-20533. -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed > Fix the flaky TestAssignmentManagerMetrics >

[jira] [Reopened] (HBASE-20639) Implement permission checking through AccessController instead of RSGroupAdminEndpoint

2018-05-29 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu reopened HBASE-20639: > Implement permission checking through AccessController instead of > RSGroupAdminEndpoint >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-20659) Implement a reopen table regions procedure

2018-05-29 Thread Duo Zhang (JIRA)
Duo Zhang created HBASE-20659: - Summary: Implement a reopen table regions procedure Key: HBASE-20659 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20659 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-20658) Release latch early for ModifyTable and TruncateTable procedure.

2018-05-29 Thread Ankit Singhal (JIRA)
Ankit Singhal created HBASE-20658: - Summary: Release latch early for ModifyTable and TruncateTable procedure. Key: HBASE-20658 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20658 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-20657) Retrying RPC call for ModifyTableProcedure may stuck

2018-05-29 Thread Sergey Soldatov (JIRA)
Sergey Soldatov created HBASE-20657: --- Summary: Retrying RPC call for ModifyTableProcedure may stuck Key: HBASE-20657 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20657 Project: HBase

Re: [DISCUSS] Make WALEdit an Interface; expose Read-Only version to CPs

2018-05-29 Thread Stack
What version you thinking @chia-ping? If 2.1/3.0, should we instead be working toward HBASE-16473 *Merge WALEdit and WALKey*? Our WALEdit/WALKey duplicate info and seem way fatter than they need to be. Would be nice to revisit these data structures... in light of our experience writing and

Re: [DISCUSS] including shaded artifacts in the convenience binary

2018-05-29 Thread Sean Busbey
Any other feedback here folks? Mike D, you leaning towards the client tarball or just making sure I've considered it? (FWIW, I think the client tarball would work fine practically speaking and don't feel strongly about either approach.) On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 1:01 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > Hi