[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-23784) /hadoop-3.1.3/libexec/hadoop-functions.sh:行2360: HADOOP_ORG.APACHE.HADOOP.HBASE.UTIL.GETJAVAPROPERTY_USER: 错误的替换

2020-03-02 Thread Guanghao Zhang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guanghao Zhang resolved HBASE-23784. Resolution: Invalid > /hadoop-3.1.3/libexec/hadoop-functions.sh:行2360: > HADOOP_ORG.APACH

Re: [DISCUSS] EOM for branch-2.1?

2020-03-02 Thread Sean Busbey
hbase 2.2.0 came out in june 2019. That's over 8 months ago. It's been 2 months since the discussion about EOM for 2.1 after we release 2.3.0. at the time 2.3 was close. Now there are weeks of stabilization before RCs. There is the beginning of a discussion for if we will even use a branch-2.3 or

Re: [DISCUSS] EOM for branch-2.1?

2020-03-02 Thread Duo Zhang
IIRC the decision is to wait until we have a 2.3.x release and also the stable pointer has been moved to 2.2.x. Now the stable pointer is there, but no 2.3.x release yet. So I propose we send out the EOL notice after we create branch-2.3? This is a sign that 2.3.x will come out soon. Stack 于2020

Re: [VOTE] Merge "HBASE-22514 Move rsgroup feature into core of HBase" back to master

2020-03-02 Thread Sean Busbey
> This is begging another unaddressed question -- are we going to continue > branching for the 2.x minor release lines? Will we release directly from > branch-2, as we have started with branch-1? This specific point should be discussed in a different thread. On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 12:31 PM Nick

Re: [DISCUSS] remove "stable-1" pointer

2020-03-02 Thread Josh Elser
SGTM On 3/2/20 11:53 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: The 'stable-1' pointer was a hedge at the time we decided to make the 'stable' pointer point at a branch-2.x for the first time. The experience has been good, so there isn't a need to hedge any longer, in my opinion. We should delete the stable-1 p

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-23919) [fla

2020-03-02 Thread Michael Stack (Jira)
Michael Stack created HBASE-23919: - Summary: [fla Key: HBASE-23919 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-23919 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Michael Stack

Re: [VOTE] Merge "HBASE-22514 Move rsgroup feature into core of HBase" back to master

2020-03-02 Thread Nick Dimiduk
> And on backporting to branch-2, I think this is all to Nick as he is the release manager. I'd like to take it into branch-2 as soon as we can. We've done a major round of stabilization of branch-2, but that concluded before the winter break. Now that we've had a handful of major features land, I

Parquet vs HFile

2020-03-02 Thread Burd, Roni
Has anyone looked at leveraging Parquet files to replace HFiles? I recognize that HFiles may be more advanced for the hbase case, but my assumption is that Parquet can be evolved as well. This would also help hfiles align better with a more widely adopted industry standard. Thoughts?

Re: [DISCUSS] EOM for branch-2.1?

2020-03-02 Thread Stack
Sounds good to me. S On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 6:34 AM Sean Busbey wrote: > Hi folks! > > The Apache HBase 2.1.z release line started in July 2018. It has had a > total of 10 releases, the last of which was mid-February of this year. > > In the end of January we made 2.2.3+ our "stable" release poi

[RESULT] [VOTE] First Release Candidate for HBase 1.6.0 is available for download

2020-03-02 Thread Andrew Purtell
With 8 +1 votes (6 +1s binding, including my own), and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote passes. Releasing the 1.6.0 artifacts now. Will announce in 24 hours. My sincere thanks to all who voted on the release candidate! On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 9:04 AM Andrew Purtell wrote: > Please vote on this rel

Re: [VOTE] Merge "HBASE-22514 Move rsgroup feature into core of HBase" back to master

2020-03-02 Thread Andrew Purtell
+1 Also, +1 to putting this in 2.4. Will give us one of hopefully several reasons to keep moving forward. No need to delay the 2.3 release train. I'd like to try to pick up the backport of this at my employer as part of adopting 2.4 in some way, for what it's worth. I think maybe 2.4 for us for t

Re: [DISCUSS] remove "stable-1" pointer

2020-03-02 Thread Andrew Purtell
The 'stable-1' pointer was a hedge at the time we decided to make the 'stable' pointer point at a branch-2.x for the first time. The experience has been good, so there isn't a need to hedge any longer, in my opinion. We should delete the stable-1 pointer. On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 6:41 AM Sean Busb

[DISCUSS] remove "stable-1" pointer

2020-03-02 Thread Sean Busbey
I don't remember who I was chatting with, but the stable-1 pointer came up and it reminded me that I don't care for it. :) As a community we use the "stable" pointer as a way to guide downstream folks who don't want to be actively engaged in HBase internals. It's supposed to be a guidepost that sa

[DISCUSS] EOM for branch-2.1?

2020-03-02 Thread Sean Busbey
Hi folks! The Apache HBase 2.1.z release line started in July 2018. It has had a total of 10 releases, the last of which was mid-February of this year. In the end of January we made 2.2.3+ our "stable" release pointer. That effectively says that as a community we believe everyone on an earlier re

Re: [VOTE] Merge "HBASE-22514 Move rsgroup feature into core of HBase" back to master

2020-03-02 Thread Sean Busbey
Personally, I'd rather see the branch-2 backport wait for 2.4. the 2.3 release has been "close" for a while now and 2.2 came out in June 2019. On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 1:16 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > > Thanks stack, so finally we have 3 binding +1s now. > > Let merge the branch back. And on backport

[ANNOUNCE] Apache HBase 1.4.13 is now available for download.

2020-03-02 Thread Sakthi
The HBase team is happy to announce the immediate availability of Apache HBase 1.4.13. Download from http://hbase.apache.org/downloads Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, non-relational database. Apache HBase gives you low latency random access to billions of rows with million