[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-25289) [testing] Clean up resources after tests in rsgroup_shell_test.rb

2020-11-17 Thread Guanghao Zhang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guanghao Zhang resolved HBASE-25289. Fix Version/s: 2.3.4 2.4.0 Resolution: Fixed Pushed to

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-25301) NPE while running balance_rsgroup if any split region is present.

2020-11-17 Thread Ajeet Rai (Jira)
Ajeet Rai created HBASE-25301: - Summary: NPE while running balance_rsgroup if any split region is present. Key: HBASE-25301 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25301 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-25300) 'Unknown table hbase:quota' happens when desc table in shell if quota disabled

2020-11-17 Thread Sun Xin (Jira)
Sun Xin created HBASE-25300: --- Summary: 'Unknown table hbase:quota' happens when desc table in shell if quota disabled Key: HBASE-25300 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25300 Project: HBase

Re: VOTE: Merge HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2" (Was "HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to mas

2020-11-17 Thread Andrew Purtell
I am concerned this is not a valid technical veto and it’s time for the PMC to take a more active role. This is poison to collaboration and it is affecting multiple people. > On Nov 17, 2020, at 5:43 PM, 张铎 wrote: > > Hi, bring my -1 from the HEAD-UP thread, this is a veto. > > My concerns

Re: VOTE: Merge HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2" (Was "HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to mas

2020-11-17 Thread Duo Zhang
Hi, bring my -1 from the HEAD-UP thread, this is a veto. My concerns have not been fully resolved. Let's work it out on jira. Thanks. clara xiong 于2020年11月18日周三 上午1:51写道： > +1 > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:49 AM Huaxiang Sun > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:21 AM Bharath

Re: VOTE: Merge HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2" (Was "HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to mas

2020-11-17 Thread clara xiong
+1 On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:49 AM Huaxiang Sun wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:21 AM Bharath Vissapragada > wrote: > > > +1. Reviewed the design doc and the consolidated patch, great > improvement, > > thanks for putting this together. > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:09 AM Stack

Re: VOTE: Merge HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2" (Was "HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to mas

2020-11-17 Thread Huaxiang Sun
+1 On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:21 AM Bharath Vissapragada wrote: > +1. Reviewed the design doc and the consolidated patch, great improvement, > thanks for putting this together. > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:09 AM Stack wrote: > > > +1 > > S > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 8:43 AM Stack wrote:

Re: VOTE: Merge HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2" (Was "HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to mas

2020-11-17 Thread Bharath Vissapragada
+1. Reviewed the design doc and the consolidated patch, great improvement, thanks for putting this together. On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:09 AM Stack wrote: > +1 > S > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 8:43 AM Stack wrote: > > > Please VOTE on whether to merge HBASE-18070 feature branch to master (and >

Re: HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2

2020-11-17 Thread Stack
I've started an adjacent VOTE thread in an attempt at clarity of how-to-go-forward here. Thanks, S On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 7:56 AM Andrew Purtell wrote: > Hi Duo, > > Just to be clear: You are saying go ahead with the merge, but then also go > back and start this discussion fresh, to see if

Re: VOTE: Merge HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2" (Was "HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to mas

2020-11-17 Thread Stack
+1 S On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 8:43 AM Stack wrote: > Please VOTE on whether to merge HBASE-18070 feature branch to master (and > HBASE-18070.branch-2 to branch-2). The VOTE runs for 24 hours. The majority > prevails (+ or -). > > Quoting the design lead-in: > > Read Replicas on the hbase:meta

Re: HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2

2020-11-17 Thread Huaxiang Sun
Hi Duo, Happy birthday! Let me explain the reasons that why we chose to land the client patch to master along with the backend changes (HBASE-18070 branch). 1. Client patch does not work very well by itself (without "real-time" replication of meta wal edits, the gap between primary

Re: VOTE: Merge HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2" (Was "HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to mas

2020-11-17 Thread Andrew Purtell
+1 On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 8:44 AM Stack wrote: > Please VOTE on whether to merge HBASE-18070 feature branch to master (and > HBASE-18070.branch-2 to branch-2). The VOTE runs for 24 hours. The majority > prevails (+ or -). > > Quoting the design lead-in: > > Read Replicas on the hbase:meta

VOTE: Merge HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2" (Was "HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master

2020-11-17 Thread Stack
Please VOTE on whether to merge HBASE-18070 feature branch to master (and HBASE-18070.branch-2 to branch-2). The VOTE runs for 24 hours. The majority prevails (+ or -). Quoting the design lead-in: Read Replicas on the hbase:meta Table currently only does primitive read of the primary’s hfiles

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-25261) Upgrade Bootstrap to 3.4.1

2020-11-17 Thread Peter Somogyi (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Peter Somogyi resolved HBASE-25261. --- Fix Version/s: 2.3.4 2.2.7 2.4.0

Re: HEAD-UP: Merging HBASE-18070 "Enable memstore replication for meta replica" to master and then back to branch-2

2020-11-17 Thread Andrew Purtell
Hi Duo, Just to be clear: You are saying go ahead with the merge, but then also go back and start this discussion fresh, to see if anything was missed and more can be done? > On Nov 16, 2020, at 11:25 PM, 张铎 wrote: > > Oh, this is my fault. I mean the old behavior IS to go to primary

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-25299) Scan#setRowPrefixFilter Unexpected behavior

2020-11-17 Thread tianhang tang (Jira)
tianhang tang created HBASE-25299: - Summary: Scan#setRowPrefixFilter Unexpected behavior Key: HBASE-25299 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25299 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-25298) hbase.rsgroup.fallback.enable should support dynamic configuration

2020-11-17 Thread Baiqiang Zhao (Jira)
Baiqiang Zhao created HBASE-25298: - Summary: hbase.rsgroup.fallback.enable should support dynamic configuration Key: HBASE-25298 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25298 Project: HBase

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-25296) [Documentation] fix duplicate conf entry

2020-11-17 Thread Guanghao Zhang (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guanghao Zhang resolved HBASE-25296. Resolution: Fixed Pushed to master. Thanks [~tangtianhang] for contributing. >