Michael Stack created HBASE-25349:
-
Summary: [fl
Key: HBASE-25349
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25349
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Michael Stack
W
Looks like 3.4.1 hbase-thirdparty is fine after all (my environment was at
fault).
Sorry for false alarm.
S
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 11:33 AM Stack wrote:
> The below release was built with jdk11 it seems. When I tried committing
> it to branch-2, I ran into
>
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack resolved HBASE-25348.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Resolving as 'Won't Fix' for now... Not needed afterall – not at the m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack resolved HBASE-25320.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Re-resolve. Mis-signal on my part. All seems to be good. Thanks for checki
Michael Stack created HBASE-25348:
-
Summary: [hbase-thirdparty] 3.4.2 release
Key: HBASE-25348
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25348
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
I think by git tag would work. Given the URL can be different from the
visible anchor text we could use an exact git sha too, if there is concern
that tags might be changed either accidentally or intentionally in a way
that breaks embedded links in old changelogs.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 11:57 AM
I am in favor of referring off to the changes files of older releases.
Would that be by git tag, or to the files in the distribution archives?
I don’t think these changes files are for marketing as such. However, I
think they are intended to be human-readable (if not for humans, then
who/what, and
The ask of this thread was originally to change the semantics of
"signed-off-by" to only be "A committer who gave an explicit +1". That
was the ask from a community member and why I started this.
I want to tease this apart from the "reviewed-by" suggestion, as this
obviously needs a little mor
Yeah, that's the intent of what Bharath had suggested and I liked. In
parallel, see other part of thread from Yu and Nick.
On 11/21/20 11:31 AM, Reid Chan wrote:
Does that mean:
Signed-off-by for binding +1 (from committer),
Reviewed-by for non-binding +1 (from volunteer)?
Sounds good to me.
Michael Stack created HBASE-25347:
-
Summary: [hbase-thirdparty] Add max java version enforcer rule
Key: HBASE-25347
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25347
Project: HBase
Issue
The below release was built with jdk11 it seems. When I tried committing it
to branch-2, I ran into
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(I)Ljava/nio/ByteBuffer;}}
(See HBASE-25320)
I am now working on putting up a 3.4.2 that is 3.4.1 only built w/ jdk8.
Can do a quick vote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Huaxiang Sun reopened HBASE-25343:
--
Reopen to reflect the new scope.
> Avoid the failed meta replica region temporarily in Load Balan
Hi Bruno
Regarding the perf issue with more CPs you might be interested in seeing
this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25277
Regards
Ram
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 11:25 PM ramkrishna vasudevan <
ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is great information. Thanks Bruno. Keep us
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 6:38 AM mallik.v.ar...@gmail.com <
mallik.v.ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 7:34 PM Sean Busbey wrote:
>
> > One reason for moving it out of core is that at some point we will have
> > hbase 3 releases. Right now hbase 3 targeted things are in the master
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack reopened HBASE-25320:
---
I think third-party was compiled w/ jdk11? I get this with it in place.
Reopening and reverting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Stack resolved HBASE-25320.
---
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Resolution: Fixed
Merged to branch-2 and master. Thanks for the
If no other objections tomorrow, will follow what Sean proposed above, to
include the patch in 3.0.0 and mark the issue as incompatible change.
Thanks.
张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2020年11月30日周一 上午11:04写道：
> I think it could introduce compilation error when removing the throws part
> of a method signature. A
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 7:34 PM Sean Busbey wrote:
> One reason for moving it out of core is that at some point we will have
> hbase 3 releases. Right now hbase 3 targeted things are in the master
> branch. If the feature is not sufficiently ready to be in a release then
> when the time for HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viraj Jasani resolved HBASE-25332.
--
Fix Version/s: 2.3.4
2.2.7
2.4.0
3.0.0
One reason for moving it out of core is that at some point we will have
hbase 3 releases. Right now hbase 3 targeted things are in the master
branch. If the feature is not sufficiently ready to be in a release then
when the time for HBase 3 releases comes we'll have to do work to pull it
out of the
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 12:14 PM Stack wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:30 PM mallik.v.ar...@gmail.com <
> mallik.v.ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Inline
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020, 10:10 AM Andrew Purtell
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We are allowed to debate if this should be in the tree or not. Given
nilonealex created HBASE-25346:
--
Summary: hbase2.x the speed of writing data is slower than version
1.x
Key: HBASE-25346
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25346
Project: HBase
Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Huaxiang Sun resolved HBASE-25343.
--
Resolution: Won't Do
> Add HA support on top of Load Balance mode
> --
23 matches
Mail list logo
