On a thread in general@incubator (the one with subject "Looking for a
champion: resurrect log4j 1.x") a member of the ZooKeeper PMC said they
would be moving to Logback, that is where I got that information from.
Yes I will open an discussion on dev@ and a JIRA soon. My opinion is log4j
2 has unfo
Duo -- yes, you are correct, but I wanted to give the opportunity for
others who didn't work on it (and thus, have an interest in seeing it
merged) to also vote :). I plan to merge this into master given the
current response from the other devs.
Andrew -- I feel that very well. Thanks for taking t
This is the thread in zookeeper dev mailing list for discussing whether to
migrate to logback
https://lists.apache.org/thread/1ktv03wvqtfg22d13c1yo1lgnjv6xpkt
AFAICT they haven't decided yet, a member in the community posted exactly
what I want to say
I think it would be a mistake to use the rec
Although this isn't really the right place I did want to circle back here
because in this context we are discussing HBase 3 and voting on alpha
versions toward a GA version.
ZooKeeper has decided to migrate from log4j to logback. Perhaps there would
be interest in doing that here, before 3.0 is fi
+1 (binding)
Really happy to see this. Apologies that I have so limited bandwidth these
days.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 10:54 AM Josh Elser wrote:
> Thanks to all who took the time to vote already!
>
> So far, we have 5 +1's (2 binding, 3 non-binding) which is sufficient
> for a lazy-consensus R
+1 (binding)
* Signature: ok
* Checksum : ok
* Rat check (1.8.0_312): ok
- mvn clean apache-rat:check
* Built from source (1.8.0_312): ok
- mvn clean install -DskipTests
* Unit tests pass (1.8.0_312): failed
- mvn package -P runAl
Yi Mei created HBASE-26615:
--
Summary: Snapshot referenced data files are deleted when delete a
table with merge regions
Key: HBASE-26615
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26615
Project: HBase
