Re:Re: Allowing clients to set priorities

using this feature, we can set priority for different request, sounds useful At 2016-04-21 14:21:15, "Stack" wrote: >On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:47 PM, rahul gidwani >wrote: > >> I was wondering if people would be interested in allowing the client

questions on HConnectionImplementation and HTable in hbase0.98.10

the version we use is hbase 0.98.10 i have some doubt on HConnectionImplementation and HTable 1. we can get a HConnectionImplementation using HConnectionManager using 'createConnection' method, and we can set the parameter 'managed' to true such as the method in class HConnectionManager,

Re:Re: questions on HConnectionImplementation and HTable in hbase0.98.10

mplementation rather than being owned by HTable. >It will be closed by when HConnection is closed. > >Enis > > > >On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:07 PM, WangYQ <wangyongqiang0...@163.com> wrote: > >> the version we use is hbase 0.98.10 >> i have some doubt

improvement on compaction

in hbase0.98.10, DefaultCompactPolicy sort HFiles using seq_id as the main factor.the new file created after compaction will get ist seq_id from hregion,if we have some HFiles, seq_ids are as follows:f1 4f2 6f3 8f4 9f5 12 if we compact file f2,f3,f4, get f6_new, we will get seq_id

(无主题)

guys, i have some problems on seq_id 1. what is the motivation of adding seq_id as part of the bulkload files 2. why introduce the conf hbase.mapreduce.bulkload.assign.sequenceNumbers in class loadIncrementalHFiles, if this is true, every time we flush, should first do a flush 3. now if we

回复：Re: Re: improvements on snapshot

may receive SnapshotExistsException, right ? Better approach is to use list_snapshots command to obtain existing snapshots so that your attempt is more guided. Cheers On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 10:21 AM, WangYQ <wangyongqiang0...@163.com> wrote: > 1. i download the src code