Hi All,
May be wrong forum, but how to unsubscribe my email id from this email list?
ThanksKarthik
From: ashish singhi <ashish.sin...@huawei.com>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 8:57 PM
Subject: RE: Moving 2.0 forward
One question regarding upgrade:
Do we expect the user to move to latest branch-1 release and then upgrade to
2.0 version ?
I think that should not be imposed on the user.
Regards,
Ashish
-----Original Message-----
From: 张铎(Duo Zhang) [mailto:palomino...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 July 2017 12:10
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving 2.0 forward
I set HBASE-18169 as a Blocker because I found some critial problems on our
current CPs. The semantics are broken. Although we are allowed to break CP in a
major release, I think we need to provide the same ability(in another way).
2017-07-25 1:25 GMT+08:00 Josh Elser <els...@apache.org>:
>
>
> On 7/21/17 12:03 PM, Stack wrote:
>
>> Status update girls and boys!
>>
>> hbase-2.0.0-alpha1 went out June 22nd.
>>
>> alpha2 has been a bit slow to follow (holidays) though there has been
>> steady progress closing out blockers and criticals by a bunch of you all.
>> The plan is for a release in the first week or so of August. It
>> should be fully up on hbase-thirdparty using updated (and relocated)
>> versions of netty, guava, and protobuf as well as a default deploy
>> that has master-carrying-no-regions.
>>
>> alpha3 will follow soon after and will focus on making sure our
>> user-facing APIs are clean (branch-1 compatible, no illicit
>> removals/mods, and so on) and that basic upgrade 'works'.
>>
>> betas start in September?
>>
>> I've been keeping a rough general state here [1] (please update any
>> section that is lagging actuality) but for details on what blockers
>> and criticals remain, see the JIRA 2.0 view [2]. Recent
>> issue-gardening has brought 2.0 into better focus. Feel free to
>> review and punt items you think can wait till 3.0 or 2.1. If you want
>> to pull in more stuff, please ask first.
>>
>
> Chia-Ping (I think? -- JIRA is being a pain) had asked on the
> space-quota
> phase2 work (include size of hbase snapshots in a table's "quota
> usage") if we should try to also include that work in 2.0.
>
> I like the idea of this also hitting 2.0 as it would make the feature
> a bit more "real", but am obviously a little nervous (I have no reason
> to be nervous though). I am pretty happy with the feature in terms of
> how much it is covered via testing.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17748
>
>
> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>>
>> 1.
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9i
>> Eu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/edit#
>> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12327188
>>
>
> - Josh
>
