+1 given this approach
> From: Jonathan Gray
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Change package names to org.apache.hbase
> To: "dev@hbase.apache.org"
> Date: Friday, May 28, 2010, 3:27 PM
> Agreed. A lot of the o.a.h.h.client code would reference o.a.h
> stuff. We woul
+1
Stuff thats revealed the client like HColumnDescriptor and
HTableDescriptor would also have to stay in the o.a.h.h hierarchy.
St.Ack
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> One of the last disruptive changes that has been discussed for the next
> release is changing our pack
+1, plus comments:
> What I propose is to retain o.a.h.h.client and o.a.h.h.mapreduce in the next
> release, and mark everything in them as deprecated with links to o.a.h stuff
> (we may also need to retain o.a.h.h.util since that is used client-side as
> well?). We'd also copy both those pack
, 2010 3:22 PM
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Change package names to org.apache.hbase
>
> We should only have one copy of hconnectionmanager (the core of the
> client
> logic) and the old package should point to and use the new package
> under the
> c
We should only have one copy of hconnectionmanager (the core of the client
logic) and the old package should point to and use the new package under the
covers. Few clients should depend on it.
On May 28, 2010 3:16 PM, "Jonathan Gray" wrote:
> One of the last disruptive changes that has been discu
One of the last disruptive changes that has been discussed for the next release
is changing our package names from org.apache.hadoop.hbase to org.apache.hbase
since we are now a TLP.
I'd like to see this done, and the sooner the better. I propose we do it early
next week.
There is an existing
