Re: [DISCUSS] Distributed Log Replay in branch-1

2015-07-09 Thread Stack
I filed HBASE-14503 to disable in branch-1. St.Ack On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Stack wrote: > Thanks Enis. That is a hole. > > In new runs, I found a new failure mode (See HBASE-14028). I think it > will take a week or so to fix both issues -- given it takes a while for > tests to complete n

Re: [DISCUSS] Distributed Log Replay in branch-1

2015-07-08 Thread Stack
Thanks Enis. That is a hole. In new runs, I found a new failure mode (See HBASE-14028). I think it will take a week or so to fix both issues -- given it takes a while for tests to complete not to mind I'm slow at the best of times -- and that is presuming I don't find any more new problems. Even t

Re: [DISCUSS] Distributed Log Replay in branch-1

2015-07-08 Thread Enis Söztutar
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Stack wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > > > The other > > problem is that we cannot have only DLR since if the table is offline DLS > > is needed, which forces us to maintain and test two different subsystems. > > I remembered t

Re: [DISCUSS] Distributed Log Replay in branch-1

2015-07-08 Thread Ted Yu
bq. set up at least Jenkins based integration tests that exercise the code paths +1 On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > I think we should leave it enabled in master and set up at least Jenkins > based integration tests that exercise the code paths. Otherwise, we might > be b

Re: [DISCUSS] Distributed Log Replay in branch-1

2015-07-08 Thread Andrew Purtell
I think we should leave it enabled in master and set up at least Jenkins based integration tests that exercise the code paths. Otherwise, we might be better off removing the DLR code rather than have it rot in place. On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at

Re: [DISCUSS] Distributed Log Replay in branch-1

2015-07-08 Thread Stack
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > The other > problem is that we cannot have only DLR since if the table is offline DLS > is needed, which forces us to maintain and test two different subsystems. Please say more on the above Enis. Trying to understand... St.Ack

Re: [DISCUSS] Distributed Log Replay in branch-1

2015-07-08 Thread Enis Söztutar
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Stack wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > > Hi Folks! > > > > For the 1.2 release, I think the consensus is to disable Distributed Log > > Replay by default due to lack of sufficient testing. At least, that's the > > only feedback I've

Re: [DISCUSS] Distributed Log Replay in branch-1

2015-07-08 Thread Stack
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > Hi Folks! > > For the 1.2 release, I think the consensus is to disable Distributed Log > Replay by default due to lack of sufficient testing. At least, that's the > only feedback I've heard so far. :) > > Anyone object to that? > > I've been

[DISCUSS] Distributed Log Replay in branch-1

2015-07-08 Thread Sean Busbey
Hi Folks! For the 1.2 release, I think the consensus is to disable Distributed Log Replay by default due to lack of sufficient testing. At least, that's the only feedback I've heard so far. :) Anyone object to that? Presuming no one does,what do folks think about just disabling it by default in