Hi Nick,
Thank you for your answer!
"I'm not quite comfortable with removing the warning yet (more testing to be
done), but I'm hoping to get to that point, at least for our production
workloads, if not for 2.3.0, within the early releases of 2.3.x."
What would make you comfortable?
Do you have
Hi Szabolcs,
Looks like that note was dropped in via HBASE-20830, about 2 years back.
>From what we've seen on our clusters, kicking the tires with branch-2.2 and
branch-2, that was indeed the case. Based on that recent experience and
that of others', there's a number of fixes for Procedures and
Hi!
In the current Reference Guide the section "75. Timeline-consistent High
Available Reads" is flagged as "maybe broken. Use it with caution". I'm not
familiar with the original reason it was flagged but I have spent a few
weeks working on this and after a few small fixes it looked stable
