Re: [DISCUSS] lazy consensus on "hbase-filesystem" repository

2019-04-29 Thread Josh Elser
Thanks all. Let me create this repo so we can keep this HBOSS train moving as I think Busbey is on vacation today. On HBASE-20952, that work, while helpful to the bigger cause, doesn't impact anything that folks are working on with HBOSS. We could certainly use hbase-filesystem as a place to i

Re: [DISCUSS] lazy consensus on "hbase-filesystem" repository

2019-04-27 Thread Duo Zhang
Oh let me take a look at this interesting issue, haven't noticed it yet... But ideally, I think HBASE-20952 is the correct way to decouple with the hadoop filesystem, that we first decouple WAL system with the hadoop filesystem, then we can abstract a 'FileSystem' for storing HFile, which could be

Re: [DISCUSS] lazy consensus on "hbase-filesystem" repository

2019-04-26 Thread Zach York
+1 On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 2:48 PM Andrew Purtell wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:33 AM Sean Busbey wrote: > > > Hi folks! > > > > HBASE-22149 "HBOSS: A FileSystem implementation to provide HBase's > > required semantics" has an approach to reliably running HBase on top > > of non-HDF

Re: [DISCUSS] lazy consensus on "hbase-filesystem" repository

2019-04-26 Thread Andrew Purtell
+1 On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:33 AM Sean Busbey wrote: > Hi folks! > > HBASE-22149 "HBOSS: A FileSystem implementation to provide HBase's > required semantics" has an approach to reliably running HBase on top > of non-HDFS Filesystem implementations. > > Copying from my comment there: > > > Given

[DISCUSS] lazy consensus on "hbase-filesystem" repository

2019-04-26 Thread Sean Busbey
Hi folks! HBASE-22149 "HBOSS: A FileSystem implementation to provide HBase's required semantics" has an approach to reliably running HBase on top of non-HDFS Filesystem implementations. Copying from my comment there: > Given the combination of this a) needing hadoop 3 only and b) being an > exp