Ok, I was able to work around the issues that I was having downstream.
We'll revisit this if it causes more problems in the future.
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
> jackson-databind and anything that depends on, maybe. I think we should
> figure out the situation with hbase-sha
jackson-databind and anything that depends on, maybe. I think we should
figure out the situation with hbase-shaded-testing-util first, then I can
unwind the rest of the tree.
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Stack wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
>
> > Hi Devs,
> >
> >
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> Should have thought to discuss this sooner, but I had blinders on at the
> time and wasn't thinking about the bigger picture.
>
> Currently, hbase-client carries with it a dependency on jackson due to our
> JsonMapper class, which i
They use our test-jar as well, so I think they will need HBASE-15666, but I
haven't tried this.
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Can Pig work with hbase-shaded-client instead?
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
> > Hi Devs,
> >
> > Should have thought to d
Can Pig work with hbase-shaded-client instead?
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> Should have thought to discuss this sooner, but I had blinders on at the
> time and wasn't thinking about the bigger picture.
>
> Currently, hbase-client carries with it a dependency on
Hi Devs,
Should have thought to discuss this sooner, but I had blinders on at the
time and wasn't thinking about the bigger picture.
Currently, hbase-client carries with it a dependency on jackson due to our
JsonMapper class, which is a very very thin wrapper around the jackson
ObjectMapper. Our
