Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

Pushed. That's the last blocker that I know of. On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Elliott Clark wrote: > I think that one should land today, as the last flakey test has been > removed and I've got a +1. > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Sean Busbey

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

Thanks Elliott! On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Elliott Clark wrote: > Pushed. That's the last blocker that I know of. > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Elliott Clark wrote: > > > I think that one should land today, as the last flakey test has been > >

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

Hi, Sean Are you planning to get another RC out soon? HBASE-14962 has been resolved. Thanks. On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > Vote tally: > > +1 (binding) : 1 > -1 (binding) : 1 > > This vote fails. > > Thanks for everyone who took a look. I'll spin

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

Hi Jerry! I've been waiting for us to run out of blockers. Thus far we've always ended up with another one opened before I could roll an RC after prior ones close. Here's a filter: *http://s.apache.org/hbM * at the moment I'm waiting on HBASE-15146. On Tue, Jan 26,

Re: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

I think that one should land today, as the last flakey test has been removed and I've got a +1. On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > Hi Jerry! > > I've been waiting for us to run out of blockers. Thus far we've always > ended up with another one opened

[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

Vote tally: +1 (binding) : 1 -1 (binding) : 1 This vote fails. Thanks for everyone who took a look. I'll spin another RC once HBASE-14962 is either resolved or moved out of 1.2.0 (presuming no other blockers come up). -Sean On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Sean Busbey

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

Folks, please comment on the relevant jiras and not on the VOTE thread. On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Mikhail Antonov wrote: > +1 to include patches which improve region normalization. Since it's new > functionality for 1.2, should be low risk (no regressions). > >

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

+1 to include patches which improve region normalization. Since it's new functionality for 1.2, should be low risk (no regressions). -Mikhail On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Please also consider including HBASE-15073 in the next RC. > > This JIRA gives

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

You're right, sorry. On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > Folks, please comment on the relevant jiras and not on the VOTE thread. > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Mikhail Antonov > wrote: > > > +1 to include patches which improve

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

Please also consider including HBASE-15073 in the next RC. This JIRA gives finer grained control over region normalization. Since 1.2.0 would be the first release with region normalization feature, it would be nice to get user facing aspect straightened out. Thanks On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:47

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

Checked signatures, package content, RAT, ran tests, notice repeated failure: tests in error: TestRegionServerHostname.testRegionServerHostname:86 » TestTimedOut test timed... It failed once as part of suite, and now failing for me in individual runs around every 3rd run (MacOSX). Anyone else

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

Anyone have objections to including the proc-v2 admin tasks Stephen mentions? I should have time tonight to spin an updated RC. These changes seem relatively isolated. Anyone currently testing that would oppose me keeping the same closing date for the updated candidate? On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

The administrative tasks for proc-v2 (5 JIRAs: HBASE-14107, HBASE-14108, HBASE-14487, HBASE-14488, and HBASE-14432) would be useful for debugging or unblocking hanging procedures in master DDL. The change is local and low risk. Discussing with Sean and Matteo privately, they agreed to include

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14962 Is still rearing its ugly head on me. TestSplitWalDataLoss fails on me every 1/4 times. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > Anyone have objections to including the proc-v2 admin tasks Stephen > mentions? >

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

I'll vote -1 due to HBASE-14962. (I've marked that issue as a blocker for 1.2.0). On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Elliott Clark wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14962 > > Is still rearing its ugly head on me. TestSplitWalDataLoss fails on me > every 1/4

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

anyone interested in HBASE-15019? when there is an hiccup with hdfs on the wal, replication end up stuck On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > I feel like I've seen this before myself on OSX, but didn't trace it down > either. > > > Mikhail Antonov wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

I feel like I've seen this before myself on OSX, but didn't trace it down either. Mikhail Antonov wrote: Checked signatures, package content, RAT, ran tests, notice repeated failure: tests in error: TestRegionServerHostname.testRegionServerHostname:86 » TestTimedOut test timed... It

Re: [VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

+1 Ran unit test suite Exercised basic shell commands [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 01:44 h [INFO] Finished at: 2016-01-03T09:12:35-08:00 On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Sean Busbey

[VOTE] HBase 1.2.0 RC0

Happy New Year everyone! I'm pleased to announce the first release candidate for HBase 1.2.0. Artifacts are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.2.0RC0/ As of this vote, the relevant md5 hashes are: 41c499a325ae6449fe99bbe315d07e10 hbase-1.2.0-bin.tar.gz