I'll look at 0.98.1RC0 this weekend. Promised!
-- Lars
From: Andrew Purtell
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org"
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC0) is available
Migration from 0.9
Cool, thanks for checking!
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> Ok. Was because I copied my /backup folder in /hbase/backup instead of
> /hbase.
>
> We should have given a nicer error message, or we should have also checked
> that in -check...
Ok. Was because I copied my /backup folder in /hbase/backup instead of
/hbase.
We should have given a nicer error message, or we should have also checked
that in -check...
After moving the folder correctly, was able to upgrade. So I will continue
some few testing steps.
JM
2014-03-21 21:16 GMT-
Migration from 0.94 to 0.98 is in fact supported. We tested migration with
0.98.0 and it worked. I believe LarsH at Salesforce did the same. Maybe you
have some kind of environmental issue?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> Do we want to sup
Do we want to support 0.94 to 0.98.1 migration?
Just tried -check, passed. But -execute failed:
2014-03-21 21:12:44,087 INFO [main] Configuration.deprecation:
fs.default.name is deprecated. Instead, use fs.defaultFS
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.hadoo
+1
- checked documentation and tarball
- Ran unit test suite which passed
- Ran in local and distributed mode
- checked the UI pages
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Adding VOTE tag to subject
>
> and a clarification (pardon the typo):
>
> This vote will run for 14 da
Adding VOTE tag to subject
and a clarification (pardon the typo):
This vote will run for 14 days given that a few RCs have stacked up this
month. Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
(00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as
0.98.1.
