On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 5:04 PM Sean Busbey wrote:
> ...
>
> > I didn't mention this issue in the 2.1.4 announcement. I can add a
> > follow-on or maybe better, add note on download page?
> >
>
> Download page seems more likely to catch an eye I think.
>
Added a 'notices' column to downloads wi
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:59 PM Stack wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:31 AM Sean Busbey wrote:
>
> > Wait so are the shaded clients busted in 2.1.4? The release note on
> > HBASE-22052 doesn't clearly state this, and I would expect folks
> > looking to upgrade would want to know.
> >
> >
> T
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:31 AM Sean Busbey wrote:
> Wait so are the shaded clients busted in 2.1.4? The release note on
> HBASE-22052 doesn't clearly state this, and I would expect folks
> looking to upgrade would want to know.
>
>
The nightly test was failing, yes. Fix didn't make 2.1.4 (It too
Wait so are the shaded clients busted in 2.1.4? The release note on
HBASE-22052 doesn't clearly state this, and I would expect folks
looking to upgrade would want to know.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:53 AM Stack wrote:
>
> With 5 +1s, this RC passes. Thanks to all who voted! Let me push out this
>
Thanks Duo for vote.
Vote passes with 6 +1s.
Thanks to all who voted.
Let me push out this release,
S
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:58 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> +1(binding), but please upload the compatibility report sir.
>
> Built from src: OK
> Checked sums & sigs: All matched
> Rat check: OK
+1(binding), but please upload the compatibility report sir.
Built from src: OK
Checked sums & sigs: All matched
Rat check: OK
Run all UTs(openjdk8u202):
TestHBaseTestingUtility.testMiniZooKeeperWithMultipleClientPorts fails with
-PrunAllTests, but I think this is a known issue, it will be fine if
Anyway let me try the UT at least to add a VOTE...
And where is the compatibility report sir?
Stack 于2019年3月25日周一 下午10:30写道：
> I reopened the vote. I'd called it prematurely. We need at least one more
> PMCer to vote (Thanks Duo).
>
> S
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 9:46 AM Stack wrote:
>
> > Wi
Sorry for not having enough cycles to test the RC, but I think we need 3
binding +1s?
Stack 于2019年3月25日周一 下午9:53写道：
> With 5 +1s, this RC passes. Thanks to all who voted! Let me push out this
> RC as 2.1.4.
>
> FYI, I think this 2.1.4 may have an issue when you use the shaded client --
> see HBA
I reopened the vote. I'd called it prematurely. We need at least one more
PMCer to vote (Thanks Duo).
S
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 9:46 AM Stack wrote:
> With 5 +1s, this RC passes. Thanks to all who voted! Let me push out this
> RC as 2.1.4.
>
> FYI, I think this 2.1.4 may have an issue when you
You are right. Only two PMCers in here Let me reopen the VOTE. We need
one more PMC vote.
S
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:02 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang)
wrote:
> Sorry for not having enough cycles to test the RC, but I think we need 3
> binding +1s?
>
> Stack 于2019年3月25日周一 下午9:53写道：
>
> > With 5 +1s, thi
With 5 +1s, this RC passes. Thanks to all who voted! Let me push out this
RC as 2.1.4.
FYI, I think this 2.1.4 may have an issue when you use the shaded client --
see HBASE-22052 release notes. Will push out a 2.1.5 with a fix inside the
next few weeks.
S
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:36 AM Stack
+1
* Signature: ok
* Checksum : ok
* Rat check (1.8.0_201): ok
* Built from source (1.8.0_201): ok
* Unit tests pass (1.8.0_201): ok
some flaky tests but passed after multiple attempts
* Basic Shell commands: ok
* Web UI: ok
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 7:30 AM Tak-Lon (Stephen) Wu
wrote:
> +1 (non-
+1 (non-binding)
* Signature: ok
* Checksum : ok
* Rat check (1.8.0_202): ok
- mvn clean apache-rat:check
* Built from source (1.8.0_202): ok
- mvn clean install -DskipTests
* Unit tests pass (1.8.0_202): ok
- mvn test -P
+1 (binding)
* I checked 2.1.4RC1 as it points to
ec50f16c336a1ec21a56c49a32a98ddb8affdd96
* Check sigs/xsums
* Spot-checked release notes and changes.
* I'm a bit confused by the contents of `dev-support/create-release`,
introduced in HBASE-21998. You intend this to still be there, Stack?
So
(+1 non-Binding)
1. Checksums and signatures(both src and bin): OK
2. Rat Check: OK
3. Built from source: OK
4. Unit Tests: OK
5. Basic Shell commands: OK
6. Web UI: OK
7. LTT with 10^5 rows: OK
Thanks stack.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:44 PM Stack wrote:
> Please vote on
Please vote on this Apache HBase release candidate (RC), 2.1.4.
The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache HBase 2.1.4
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
The tag to be voted on is 2.1.4RC1:
https://github.com/apache/hbase/tree/2.1.4RC1
T
16 matches
Mail list logo
