[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Duo Zhang resolved HBASE-25207.
-------------------------------
    Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
      Resolution: Fixed

Pushed to branch-2.2+.

Thanks [~brfrn169] for reviewing.

> Revisit the implementation and usage of RegionStates.include
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-25207
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25207
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Region Assignment
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.3.3, 2.4.0, 2.2.7
>
>
> After several round of refactoring and fixing, the method has been used in 
> lots of places and the implementation looks really confusing.
> As in the first if condition for testing RegionStateNode and RegionInfo 
> state, we will always return false when split is true, which means we will 
> always filter out split parent, as a split parent, is split = true and also 
> offline = true.
> I think the reason why there is no problem is that, only in 
> EnableTableProcedure we call this method with offline = true, and 
> EnableTableProcedure does not need to deal with split parent...
> And now since we found a problem in HBASE-25206, where we need to get split 
> parent when deleting a table, I think it is time to revisit this method and 
> make logic less confusing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to