0.89 Branch

2011-10-11 Thread Nicolas Spiegelberg
production development porting status. We do most active development on this branch, but we've started moving internal development onto 0.92 are putting more resources into stabilizing that. Q. Should I look into using this 0.89 branch? I would discourage it unless you know what you're doing

Re: 0.89 Branch

2011-10-11 Thread Todd Lipcon
development porting status.  We do most active development on this branch, but we've started moving internal development onto 0.92 are putting more resources into stabilizing that. Q. Should I look into using this 0.89 branch? I would discourage it unless you know what you're doing.  The average

Re: 0.89 Branch

2011-10-11 Thread Karthik Ranganathan
, and to serve as a transition point to be more transparent with our production development porting status. We do most active development on this branch, but we've started moving internal development onto 0.92 are putting more resources into stabilizing that. Q. Should I look into using this 0.89 branch

Re: 0.89 Branch

2011-10-11 Thread Nicolas Spiegelberg
to be more transparent with our production development porting status. We do most active development on this branch, but we've started moving internal development onto 0.92 are putting more resources into stabilizing that. Q. Should I look into using this 0.89 branch? I would discourage