ansl > >
>> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:37 AM
>> Subject: Re: 0.94.6.1 discussion (WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259)
>> Snapshot backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts)
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:19 AM, lars hofhansl wrote:
>>
>> >
> > disagree) that this is right (least confusing) path.
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Stack
> > To: HBase Dev List ; lars hofhansl <
> la...@apache.org
> > >
> > Sent: Thursd
HBase Dev List ; lars hofhansl >
> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:37 AM
> Subject: Re: 0.94.6.1 discussion (WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259)
> Snapshot backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts)
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:19 AM, lars hofhansl wrote:
>
> >
right (least confusing) path.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
>
> From: Stack
> To: HBase Dev List ; lars hofhansl >
> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:37 AM
> Subject: Re: 0.94.6.1 discussion (WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259)
> Snapshot
> From: Stack
> To: HBase Dev List ; lars hofhansl >
> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:37 AM
> Subject: Re: 0.94.6.1 discussion (WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259)
> Snapshot backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts)
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:19 AM, l
(WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259) Snapshot
backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts)
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:19 AM, lars hofhansl wrote:
> And FYI, I did make a 0.94.6.1 branch. Applied the change, updated
> CHANGES.txt and pom.xml, and am running the test suite now.
> As soon a
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:19 AM, lars hofhansl wrote:
> And FYI, I did make a 0.94.6.1 branch. Applied the change, updated
> CHANGES.txt and pom.xml, and am running the test suite now.
> As soon as that is done we can release it and simultaneously pull 0.94.6.
>
>
> The 0.94.6.1 branch is under t
From: lars hofhansl
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" ; lars hofhansl
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: 0.94.6.1 discussion (WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259) Snapshot
backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts)
That said, doing a release (ev
From: lars hofhansl
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org"
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: 0.94.6.1 discussion (WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259) Snapshot
backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts)
Pulling 0.94.6 is anot
2013 11:09 AM
> Subject: Re: 0.94.6.1 discussion (WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259)
> Snapshot backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts)
>
> +1 on 0.94.7 rather than 0.94.6.1.
>
> Chatting w/ JD and Aleks, we should pull 0.94.6. I can add note up on
> webpage to explain t
Pulling 0.94.6 is another option.
From: Stack
To: HBase Dev List
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: 0.94.6.1 discussion (WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259) Snapshot
backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts)
+1 on 0.94.7 rather than
+1 on 0.94.7 rather than 0.94.6.1.
Chatting w/ JD and Aleks, we should pull 0.94.6. I can add note up on
webpage to explain the hole.
Can I help w/ the 0.94.7 rolling?
St.Ack
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
> My problem with delaying getting this patch out there is
My problem with delaying getting this patch out there is that people
who adopt 0.94.6 are putting themselves in a hole because you also
can't roll restart out of it.
J-D
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Third 0.94.6 RC was cut on Mar. 14th.
> It has been almost 3 weeks since them
mentioned above :)
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 10:21 AM
> Subject: 0.94.6.1 discussion (WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259) Snapshot
> backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolli
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259) Snapshot
backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts)
We might wanna bring this discussion here on dev@.
So right now the questions are:
- Should we call a release with just HBASE-8259 as 0.94.6.1 or
0.94.7? How much testing are we expecting from folks?
- Should we just
Third 0.94.6 RC was cut on Mar. 14th.
It has been almost 3 weeks since them. Meaning we have sizable goodies for
the next release.
I would vote for 0.94.7 release which would come in April anyway.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
> We might wanna bring this discussion
We might wanna bring this discussion here on dev@.
So right now the questions are:
- Should we call a release with just HBASE-8259 as 0.94.6.1 or
0.94.7? How much testing are we expecting from folks?
- Should we just cut a release with what's in the branch and call it 0.94.7?
My opinion is to
17 matches
Mail list logo
