Excellent. Starting build. Thanks lads,
St.Ack
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jimmy Xiang wrote:
> HBASE-10101 is in. Thanks.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Stack wrote:
>
> > Are we good to go on RC2? Just waiting on HBase-10101? Anything else?
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> > O
HBASE-10101 is in. Thanks.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Stack wrote:
> Are we good to go on RC2? Just waiting on HBase-10101? Anything else?
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Stack wrote:
>
> > Jon fixed the Increment issue. Nicolas may have fixed the slow down
> i
Are we good to go on RC2? Just waiting on HBase-10101? Anything else?
Thanks,
St.Ack
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Stack wrote:
> Jon fixed the Increment issue. Nicolas may have fixed the slow down issue
> -- we'll know after a few runs this weekend.
>
> I'll put up a new RC Monday regardl
Jon fixed the Increment issue. Nicolas may have fixed the slow down issue
-- we'll know after a few runs this weekend.
I'll put up a new RC Monday regardless.
St.Ack
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Stack wrote:
> Good one Jon.
>
> RC is sunk. Will put up a new one when this is fixed.
>
> Th
Good one Jon.
RC is sunk. Will put up a new one when this is fixed.
Thanks,
St.Ack
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> -1
>
> I have a new test I tried on 0.96.1rc1. (polishing to share). Run #2 with
> flushes is a correctness regression (HBASE-6195 fixed this in 94, an
esday, December 4, 2013 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: ANN: The second hbase-0.96-1 release candidate is available for
download
That test doesn't do a flush during the increments so doesn't trigger the
bug.
Jon.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:58 AM, lars hofhansl wrote:
> Interesting that a
peration specifically).
>
>
>
>
> From: Jonathan Hsieh
> To: "dev@hbase.apache.org"
> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 8:16 AM
> Subject: Re: ANN: The second hbase-0.96-1 release candidate is available
> for download
>
>
> I've filed an
Interesting that at least the concurrent flush part wasn't caught by the unit
tests (TestAtomicOperation specifically).
From: Jonathan Hsieh
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org"
Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: ANN: The seco
I've filed an issue for this and will post more results there. (against
0.96.0 etc).
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10079
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> -1
>
> I have a new test I tried on 0.96.1rc1. (polishing to share). Run #2 with
> flushes is a corre
I don't know -- I'll test this against 0.96.0 and report.
Jon.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Is your test running well on 0.96.0?
>
> JM
>
>
> 2013/12/4 Jonathan Hsieh
>
> > -1
> >
> > I have a new test I tried on 0.96.1rc1. (polishing to share). Ru
Hi Jon,
Is your test running well on 0.96.0?
JM
2013/12/4 Jonathan Hsieh
> -1
>
> I have a new test I tried on 0.96.1rc1. (polishing to share). Run #2 with
> flushes is a correctness regression (HBASE-6195 fixed this in 94, and I had
> verified there but it is broken here).. I'm not sure if
-1
I have a new test I tried on 0.96.1rc1. (polishing to share). Run #2 with
flushes is a correctness regression (HBASE-6195 fixed this in 94, and I had
verified there but it is broken here).. I'm not sure if #3 (kill) or #4
(kill -9) are a regression against 0.94. Here's a link to the testcod
The second hbase-0.96.1 release candidate is available for download:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.96.1RC1/
The maven artifacts are available here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-016/
The first RC was sunk by:
HBASE-10053 ProtobufUtil#toMutati
13 matches
Mail list logo
