On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:06 AM Mike Drob wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> What do you think of my suggestion?
Pardon me Mike, didn't mean to ignore your suggestion. I was waiting for a
few more voices to chime in here. I think your suggestion is the right
choice. 1.1 backports have slowed to a crawl and
Yes, I agree with all of that, but also stable pointing to 1.2 or 1.3
doesn't matter for motivation to EOL 1.1 - as long as there is something
safe to migrate to, we should be good, right? :)
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Where I remember we left the discussion on movi
Where I remember we left the discussion on moving the stable pointer was
Mikhail and Gary would (eventually) provide feedback on if head of
branch-1.3 was better than older code, or not. Recall they have that one
odd use case causing occasional regionserver aborts. As for me, we are
making progress
The stable pointer is 1.2.x [1] so I think it should be fine to EOL 1.1.
[1] http://apache.osuosl.org/hbase/stable/
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:40 PM, 张铎(Duo Zhang)
wrote:
> IIRC the problem is the stable pointer is still on 1.1.x? No? At least
> 1.3.x is not stable yet, Andrew and Mikhail are wo
IIRC the problem is the stable pointer is still on 1.1.x? No? At least
1.3.x is not stable yet, Andrew and Mikhail are working on it I believe.
Thanks.
Mike Drob 于2017年10月27日 周五00:06写道：
> Hi Nick,
>
> What do you think of my suggestion?
>
> Mike
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Mike Drob w
Hi Nick,
What do you think of my suggestion?
Mike
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
> Maybe we do a final release on it and then EOL the branch?
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
>
>> Our beloved branch-1.1 is still showing only the most minor product
>
Maybe we do a final release on it and then EOL the branch?
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> Our beloved branch-1.1 is still showing only the most minor product
> changes. Almost everything since 1.1.12 is build, test related. Once again,
> I'll let it continue on the back-b
Our beloved branch-1.1 is still showing only the most minor product
changes. Almost everything since 1.1.12 is build, test related. Once again,
I'll let it continue on the back-burner for another month, unless someone
speaks up.
Same time next month,
-n
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Nick Dimid
Heya folks,
There's slim commits to branch-1.1 over the last month. Looks like nothing
pressing by my eyes, so I'm going to let the branch simmer for another
month, let more changes accumulate. Will check back in with you in early
October.
Reply here if you have strong feeling to the contrary.
K
