Did you set replication to 1?
The following error message indicates that the default replication is set
to 1:
could only be replicated to 0 nodes, instead of 1
In that case, losing a datanode would mean blocks will be lost.
Enis
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Álvaro Recuero wrote:
> Data
Data nodes are fine. Actually the Region server on that serverx is the
solely one dead afterwards. Datanode is up, and HDFS reporting healthy
status. Interesting that is possible.
I have steadily come across the problem again testing a new HBase cluster,
so yes, I would bet the problem is in H
Yes Esteban I have checked the health of the datanodes from the master in
the hadoop console. Nothing seems really wrong to cause this, even though
one data-node is apparently lost along with the RS in the process of
inserting 50 Million updates... the other 11 are there, up and running so
it shou
Álvaro,
Have you checked for the health of HDFS? Maybe your cluster ran out of
space or you don't have data nodes running.
Esteban
> On Apr 5, 2014, at 10:11, haosdent wrote:
>
> From the log informations, it seems you lost blocks.
> 2014-4-6 上午12:38于 "Álvaro Recuero" 写道：
>
>> has anyone come a
>From the log informations, it seems you lost blocks.
2014-4-6 上午12:38于 "Álvaro Recuero" 写道：
> has anyone come across this before? there is still space in the RS and this
> is not a problem of datanodes availability as I can confirm. cheers
>
> 2014-04-05 09:55:19,210 DEBUG
> org.apache.hadoop.hba
has anyone come across this before? there is still space in the RS and this
is not a problem of datanodes availability as I can confirm. cheers
2014-04-05 09:55:19,210 DEBUG
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.SequenceFileLogWriter: using new
createWriter -- HADOOP-6840
2014-04-05 09:55:19,21
