Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?

2013-12-11 Thread Stack
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote: > There are two things being discussed here -- can we clarify where folks > stand on this? Here's how I'm interpreting it (please correct). > > deprecate hadoop1 in 0.98/trunk? (+1's from stack, ted, enis, larsh, > andrew, amandeep) > defaul

Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?

2013-12-11 Thread Andrew Purtell
gt; > At Salesforce we run 0.94 with Hadoop 2 anyway :) > > > > > > -1 (or maybe -0) for removing Hadoop 1 support. Lot's folks will have a > > > lot of data in Hadoop 1 that they do not want to touch. > > > > > > -- Lars > &

Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?

2013-12-11 Thread Jonathan Hsieh
-- Lars > > > > > > > > > > From: Ted Yu > > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 1:13 PM > > Subject: Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency? > > > > > > +1 on making hadoop-2 defa

Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?

2013-12-09 Thread Ted Yu
ot of data in Hadoop 1 that they do not want to touch. > > -- Lars > > > > > From: Ted Yu > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 1:13 PM > Subject: Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency? > > >

Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?

2013-11-11 Thread Stack
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Stack wrote: > > > Should we at least deprecate it in 0.98 or maybe > > even just drop it in 0.98? > > > > +1 deprecate > +0 drop > I'm same as Andrew and I like Enis suggestion that in 0.98 hadoop2 becom

Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?

2013-11-11 Thread Amandeep Khurana
>From a user perspective, my vote would be to deprecate in 0.98 and drop in 1.0.0. Keep things simple. Don't add more variables for users and operators to have to think about. > On Nov 11, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Stack wrote: > > Sounds like we're talking about support for hadoop1 through to hbase 1.0.

Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?

2013-11-11 Thread lars hofhansl
apache.org" Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 1:13 PM Subject: Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency? +1 on making hadoop-2 default for 0.98 On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > +1 on changing the default to be hadoop-2 for 0.98. > > I am not so sure about dropp

Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?

2013-11-11 Thread Ted Yu
+1 on making hadoop-2 default for 0.98 On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > +1 on changing the default to be hadoop-2 for 0.98. > > I am not so sure about dropping support for hadoop-1 this early. We do not > want Hbase users stuck on earlier HBase versions, because they cann

Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?

2013-11-11 Thread Enis Söztutar
+1 on changing the default to be hadoop-2 for 0.98. I am not so sure about dropping support for hadoop-1 this early. We do not want Hbase users stuck on earlier HBase versions, because they cannot update their hadoops. Enis On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > On Mon, Nov

Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?

2013-11-11 Thread Andrew Purtell
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Stack wrote: > Should we at least deprecate it in 0.98 or maybe > even just drop it in 0.98? > +1 deprecate +0 drop -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)

Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?

2013-11-11 Thread Stack
Sounds like we're talking about support for hadoop1 through to hbase 1.0.0. Is that what we want? Should we at least deprecate it in 0.98 or maybe even just drop it in 0.98? St.Ack On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > Quick question. > > Whi

Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?

2013-11-11 Thread Matteo Bertozzi
for the fs.defaultFS we have FSUtils.setFsDefault() used by most of the code https://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/trunk/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/FSUtils.java#L892 for others hadoop1/hadoop2 specific changes you can try to add the new call to hbase-hadoop-compat module

Re: Hadoop version trunk dependency?

2013-11-11 Thread Nick Dimiduk
As far as I'm aware, 0.98 will continue to support both hadoop-1 and hadoop-2 build profiles. Can you add the functionality to the 2.x version of the hadoop-compatibility shim, but you'll need to provide equivalent 1.x implementation and expose it through the API. On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:57 AM,

Hadoop version trunk dependency?

2013-11-11 Thread Jean-Marc Spaggiari
Quick question. Which hadoop version do we declare trunk is dependent on? I have a very small change in HBase 9938 but that will make it dependent on Hadoop 2.0 Same thing around HBASE-6763. If we say trunk is only Hadoop 2 compatible, then we