Re: Fixes to nio source for 1.5

2008-01-18 Thread Ortwin Glück
sebb wrote: One could use l_ for local and p_ for parameters. Please, no! Those were the times when there was no IDEs. Today it's the IDEs job to help you browse your source code. These prefixes are dead ugly. Odi -- [web] http://www.odi.ch/ [blog] http://www.odi.ch/weblog/ [pgp] key

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-httpclient (in module httpcomponents) failed

2008-01-18 Thread GUMP
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-httpclient has an issue affecting its community integration. The current

[g...@vmgump]: Project httpcomponents-core-tests (in module httpcomponents) failed

2008-01-18 Thread GUMP
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project httpcomponents-core-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. The

RE: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-httpclient (in module httpcomponents) failed

2008-01-18 Thread ossfwot
Hi folks, looks like I screwed up when defining the repo and path for our GUMP projects [1]: Tail of Update : update_httpcomponents This is a very short tail of the log at update_httpcomponents svn: URL 'http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/httpcomponents/gump-trun... k' doesn't

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-httpclient-2.0-branch (in module httpcomponents) failed

2008-01-18 Thread GUMP
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-httpclient-2.0-branch has an issue affecting its community integration.

Re: [HttpCore] HttpCore 4.0-beta1 release packages preview (2nd take)

2008-01-18 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 02:28 +, sebb wrote: On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:04:54AM +, sebb wrote: On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 21:02 +, sebb wrote: On 17/01/2008,

Re: Fixes to nio source for 1.5

2008-01-18 Thread Stojce Dimski
We can use our eyes ;-), All modern IDE's have syntax highlighting and on my eclipse per default local and object variables have different colors... OK, but something needs to be done to prevent variable hiding. IDEs ___ L'email della prossima

Re: [HttpCore] HttpCore 4.0-beta1 release packages preview (2nd take)

2008-01-18 Thread sebb
On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems OK with Java 1.5.0_13 - tried 6 or so tests, and no failures. However, when I test with Java 1.6.0_03, I get the error: --- Test set:

Re: [HttpCore] HttpCore 4.0-beta1 release packages preview (2nd take)

2008-01-18 Thread sebb
On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 02:28 +, sebb wrote: On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:04:54AM +, sebb wrote: On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On

Re: Fixes to nio source for 1.5

2008-01-18 Thread sebb
On 18/01/2008, Ortwin Glück [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: One could use l_ for local and p_ for parameters. Please, no! Those were the times when there was no IDEs. Today it's the IDEs job to help you browse your source code. These prefixes are dead ugly. OK, but something needs

Fwd: Link Problem

2008-01-18 Thread sebb
Ref the below: I've editted the download page to remove the -bin from the 3.1 zip file. -- Forwarded message -- From: sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 18 Jan 2008 21:17 Subject: Re: Link Problem To: HttpClient User Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for the report. The link points

Re: unable to encode reserved characters using java.net.URI multi-arg constructors

2008-01-18 Thread Ortwin Glück
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: needs a better parser that can deal with escaped and unescaped queries, Sorry, Oleg, nobody can deal with unescaped queries. It's NOT POSSIBLE (tm). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-httpclient (in module httpcomponents) failed

2008-01-18 Thread GUMP
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-httpclient has an issue affecting its community integration. The current

Re: unable to encode reserved characters using java.net.URI multi-arg constructors

2008-01-18 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 09:47 -0500, Tim Julien wrote: All, I've spent a few days looking into some strange URL encoding issues on http client 4.0 alpha 2. I'll describe some things I've found, hopefully I am thinking about this correctly. I think there is a regression from 3.0 - 4.0 due

Re: [HttpCore] HttpCore 4.0-beta1 release packages preview (2nd take)

2008-01-18 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Seems OK with Java 1.5.0_13 - tried 6 or so tests, and no failures. However, when I test with Java 1.6.0_03, I get the error: --- Test set: org.apache.http.nio.TestAll

Re: unable to encode reserved characters using java.net.URI multi-arg constructors

2008-01-18 Thread Ortwin Glück
Tim Julien wrote: For example, suppose I want to produce this URL: http://foo.com/bar?a=bc=jon%26doe // %26 is the encoded value of // %25 is the encoded value of % uri = new URI(http, null, foo.com, -1, /bar, a=bc=jon%26doe, null); uri.toASCIIString() -

[g...@vmgump]: Project httpcomponents-core (in module httpcomponents) failed

2008-01-18 Thread GUMP
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project httpcomponents-core has an issue affecting its community integration. The

unable to encode reserved characters using java.net.URI multi-arg constructors

2008-01-18 Thread Tim Julien
All, I've spent a few days looking into some strange URL encoding issues on http client 4.0 alpha 2. I'll describe some things I've found, hopefully I am thinking about this correctly. I think there is a regression from 3.0 - 4.0 due to the use of java.net.URI On the old commons http client

[HttpCore] HttpCore 4.0-beta1 release packages preview (3nd take)

2008-01-18 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Folks Please take one last look at the preview packages and the release notes: http://people.apache.org/~olegk/httpcore-4.0-beta1-preview/RELEASE_NOTES.txt http://people.apache.org/~olegk/httpcore-4.0-beta1-preview/packages/ If I hear no complaints, I'll go ahead with cutting the final release

Re: Fixes to nio source for 1.5

2008-01-18 Thread sebb
Of course, but it's not always immediately obvious which type of variable is intended to be used, and in large amounts of code it's possible to overlook some misuses. Why allow the the confusion at all? On 18/01/2008, Stojce Dimski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We can use our eyes ;-), All modern

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-httpclient-2.0-branch (in module httpcomponents) failed

2008-01-18 Thread GUMP
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-httpclient-2.0-branch has an issue affecting its community integration.

Re: [HttpCore] HttpCore 4.0-beta1 release packages preview (3nd take)

2008-01-18 Thread sebb
On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks Please take one last look at the preview packages and the release notes: http://people.apache.org/~olegk/httpcore-4.0-beta1-preview/RELEASE_NOTES.txt http://people.apache.org/~olegk/httpcore-4.0-beta1-preview/packages/ If I

[g...@vmgump]: Project httpcomponents-core-tests (in module httpcomponents) failed

2008-01-18 Thread GUMP
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project httpcomponents-core-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. The