On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Seems OK with Java 1.5.0_13 - tried 6 or so tests, and no failures.
> >
> > However, when I test with Java 1.6.0_03, I get the error:
> >
> > ---
> > Test se
> Seems OK with Java 1.5.0_13 - tried 6 or so tests, and no failures.
>
> However, when I test with Java 1.6.0_03, I get the error:
>
> ---
> Test set: org.apache.http.nio.TestAll
> --
On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 02:28 +, sebb wrote:
> > On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:04:54AM +, sebb wrote:
> > > > On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 02:28 +, sebb wrote:
> On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:04:54AM +, sebb wrote:
> > > On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 21:02 +, sebb wrote:
>
On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:04:54AM +, sebb wrote:
> > On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 21:02 +, sebb wrote:
> > > > On 17/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:04:54AM +, sebb wrote:
> On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 21:02 +, sebb wrote:
> > > On 17/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think I have found the probl
On 18/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 21:02 +, sebb wrote:
> > On 17/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think I have found the problem spot using my wife's dual-core Mac. I
> > > > > suspect I have ne
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 23:32 +, sebb wrote:
> On 17/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 23:06 +, sebb wrote:
> >
> > > Repeating "mvn test" shows the same Failure.
> > >
> > > Odd.
> > >
> > > The failures look rather similar - why should the
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 21:02 +, sebb wrote:
> On 17/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > I think I have found the problem spot using my wife's dual-core Mac. I
> > > > suspect I have never been seeing those problems because my primary Linux
> > > > system is
On 17/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 23:06 +, sebb wrote:
>
> > Repeating "mvn test" shows the same Failure.
> >
> > Odd.
> >
> > The failures look rather similar - why should the first one be ignored?
> > Perhaps a bug in Maven or Surefire.
> >
On 17/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > I think I have found the problem spot using my wife's dual-core Mac. I
> > > suspect I have never been seeing those problems because my primary Linux
> > > system is single-core.
> > >
> >
> > Ah - my laptop is also dual-core
> >
> > I think I have found the problem spot using my wife's dual-core Mac. I
> > suspect I have never been seeing those problems because my primary Linux
> > system is single-core.
> >
>
> Ah - my laptop is also dual-core.
>
> > Thanks for all you help
>
> No problem.
Sebastian, Anthony, et
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 16:29 +0100, Stojce Dimski wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
>
> > Writing synchronous test cases for asynchronous I/O is not an easy
> > thing. Test cases are very ugly and flaky because most of the
>
> Maybe this thing can help:
>
> http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/PL/multithreadedtc/over
Hi Oleg,
> Writing synchronous test cases for asynchronous I/O is not an easy
> thing. Test cases are very ugly and flaky because most of the
Maybe this thing can help:
http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/PL/multithreadedtc/overview.html
Cheers,
Stojce
___
L
On 17/01/2008, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 23:06 +, sebb wrote:
>
> > Repeating "mvn test" shows the same Failure.
> >
> > Odd.
> >
> > The failures look rather similar - why should the first one be ignored?
> > Perhaps a bug in Maven or Surefire.
> >
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 23:06 +, sebb wrote:
> Repeating "mvn test" shows the same Failure.
>
> Odd.
>
> The failures look rather similar - why should the first one be ignored?
> Perhaps a bug in Maven or Surefire.
>
Probably because they are not thrown in the test case itself but in the
#t
Ran mvn test, got the following stacktrace:
Running org.apache.http.nio.TestAll
org.apache.http.nio.reactor.IOReactorException: Failure accepting connection
at
org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.DefaultListeningIOReactor.processEvent(DefaultListeningIOReactor.java:103)
at
org.apach
Sebastian et al
I fixed the problem with the assembly descriptors. Packages now seem all
right. Please review.
Oleg
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 11:32 +0100, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Please take a few minutes to review the release notes and release
> packages. If I hear no complaints, I
18 matches
Mail list logo
