We need a plan to migrate to Java 11, as well as Python 3.
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:24 PM Rohan Agarwal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Starting this thread to discuss Heron and Java version compatibility.
> Public JDK 8 releases will no longer receive security updates. Java 11 is
> the current LTS versio
Hi all,
Starting this thread to discuss Heron and Java version compatibility.
Public JDK 8 releases will no longer receive security updates. Java 11 is
the current LTS version of Java.
Current state of the Heron project is this -
- Can be built with - Java 8 only
- Can be run with - Java 8
Great! Thanks a lot!
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 3:52 PM Simon Weng wrote:
> 👍👍👍
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 6:50 PM Rohan Agarwal wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I will be making some changes to make Heron compatible with the latest
> > Bazel version.
> >
> > Currently compatible Bazel version - 0.23.2
>
👍👍👍
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 6:50 PM Rohan Agarwal wrote:
> Hi all,
> I will be making some changes to make Heron compatible with the latest
> Bazel version.
>
> Currently compatible Bazel version - 0.23.2
> Latest Bazel version - 0.25.3
>
> The changes should be very small, and only involve chan
Hi all,
I will be making some changes to make Heron compatible with the latest
Bazel version.
Currently compatible Bazel version - 0.23.2
Latest Bazel version - 0.25.3
The changes should be very small, and only involve changing a few build
rules. Also, I expect the changes to be backwards compati
Hey All,
Did a little more looking at this. I did a little more looking into
Docusarus. My quick scan of the web page was incorrect.. I think
Docusarus would replace the current framework that our site is built with
(Hugo). So. While versioning the site with Docusaurus would be fairly
simple. I
Certainly I don’t know much about documentation tooling, but I heard good
things about Docusarus, and also Gitbook.
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 8:16 AM Josh Fischer wrote:
> Ok sounds good. Thanks.
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 2:37 AM Ning Wang wrote:
>
> > Looks good~
> >
> > For the move, I think
Ok sounds good. Thanks.
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 2:37 AM Ning Wang wrote:
> Looks good~
>
> For the move, I think we don't really need to wait for the release.
> Especially we may need to have a "master" version and other versions for
> different releases.
>
> How far back might depends on how e
Looks good~
For the move, I think we don't really need to wait for the release.
Especially we may need to have a "master" version and other versions for
different releases.
How far back might depends on how easy it is to generate web pages. :) It
might be good enough to start having the pages af
