h Jayachandran
>>>>> Gunther Hagleitner
>>>>> Sushanth Sowmyan
>>>>> Jason Dere
>>>>>
>>>>> No 0s or -1s.
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to release
>>>>> Apache Hive 2.1.0 has passed! We'
r
>>>> Sushanth Sowmyan
>>>> Jason Dere
>>>>
>>>> No 0s or -1s.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to release
>>>> Apache Hive 2.1.0 has passed! We'll now roll the release out to the
>>>> mirrors.
>&
he proposal to release
>>> Apache Hive 2.1.0 has passed! We'll now roll the release out to the
>>> mirrors.
>>>
>>> In addition, I have created HIVE-14059 to fix the issue with the
>>> missing headers for the 2 files (thanks for catching that o
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/17/16, 3:54 PM, "Jason Dere" wrote:
>>
>> >Checked signatures, ran build and a few tests.
>> >+1
>> >
>> >From: Sushanth Sowmyan
>> >Sent: Friday
that one
> Sushanth).
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 6/17/16, 3:54 PM, "Jason Dere" wrote:
>
> >Checked signatures, ran build and a few tests.
> >+1
> >____________
> >From: Sushanth Sowmyan
> >Sent: Friday, J
d a few tests.
>+1
>
>From: Sushanth Sowmyan
>Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 3:30 PM
>To: dev@hive.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3
>
>Actually, to be more explicit, per Thejas' case of the top leve
Checked signatures, ran build and a few tests.
+1
From: Sushanth Sowmyan
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 3:30 PM
To: dev@hive.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3
Actually, to be more explicit, per Thejas' case of the top
Actually, to be more explicit, per Thejas' case of the top level
license taking precedence, this RC has my +1.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Sushanth Sowmyan wrote:
> I will happily rescind my -1 and even convert it to a +1 if the top
> level license does hold. I thought that the RAT check was
I will happily rescind my -1 and even convert it to a +1 if the top
level license does hold. I thought that the RAT check was a necessary
blocker.
(Although, if the top level license does cover across the board, we
may want to open a new discussion on whether having a license
requirement for every
I don't think the missing headers for 2 files mandates a respin of
this RC . It is not really a case of 'incompatible' license or code
that shouldn't be shipped.
We have a top level license file that covers the entire project,
including these files.
IMO, We should fix it if there is a new RC for s
-1, terribly sorry I didn't check for this earlier, but the RAT check
fails for this.
If you run mvn apache-rat:check , then you see the following issue:
Unapproved licenses:
/Users/sush/t/rel/apache-hive-2.1.0-src/common/src/java/org/apache/hive/common/util/DateParser.java
/Users/sush/t/r
@hive.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3
+1
- verified signature and checksum for binary and source
- compiled source and ran some unit tests
- ran hive cli from binary and ran some queries using tez
Thanks
Prasanth
> On Jun 16, 2016, at 6:02 PM, Jesus Camacho Rodrig
+1
- verified signature and checksum for binary and source
- compiled source and ran some unit tests
- ran hive cli from binary and ran some queries using tez
Thanks
Prasanth
> On Jun 16, 2016, at 6:02 PM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
> wrote:
>
> Apache Hive 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3 is available
13 matches
Mail list logo
