I've got all tests passing on this.
Are there other questions?
Is anyone willing to +1 ?
Thanks.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 12:28 PM David Mollitor wrote:
> Hey Zoltan,
>
> Thanks for the feedback and for sharing HIVE-16496.
>
> I think HIVE-16496 is a better approach because it allows for the
Hey Zoltan,
Thanks for the feedback and for sharing HIVE-16496.
I think HIVE-16496 is a better approach because it allows for the standard
SQL behavior of object identifiers, but the SQL syntax is expanded (instead
of overloaded) to provide this feature.
Also, if a user would like to do some
Hey,
I don't want to protect this feature - but I think it could be usefull; probably it would be ok to remove it but we should provide something else instead - I think this is
the only way to "exclude" some specific columns from the output - without listing all the columns.
How much are
Hello Gang,
I've been tracking a lot of issues recently regarding qualified tables
names, qualified table names, table names using back ticks, and other
similar circumstances.
I've looked into trying to address some of these and noted that these issue
goes way back and are go all the way down to
