>
> > Hi,
> > I want to log on to the review board, but can't remember my password. Is
> > there a way to reset it ?
> > thanks,
> > Malcolm
> >
>
Not that I know of, but you could talk to Apache infra,
https://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact
Alan.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:58 PM Malcolm Taylor wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to log on to the review board, but can't remember my password. Is
> there a way to reset it ?
> thanks,
> Malcolm
>
Hi,
I want to log on to the review board, but can't remember my password. Is
there a way to reset it ?
thanks,
Malcolm
Hi all, I was wondering if there is some reasonable explanation why my
review request is not picked up by anybody? Did I miss some required
field(s)? My review request is https://reviews.apache.org/r/43811/, any
help would be appreciated, thanks!
Best Regards,
Svetozar Ivanov
Can not upload HIVE-9520.1patch to Review Board
both web ui and rbt post return error path: list index out of range
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9520
Good call, I made a very basic fix and noted on the Phabricator page that
it's no longer used.
Brock
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Lefty Leverenz leftylever...@gmail.comwrote:
The wiki still has Phabricator information, with nothing about Apache's
review board.
How to Contribute
The wiki still has Phabricator information, with nothing about Apache's
review board.
How to Contribute: Review
Processhttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/HowToContribute#HowToContribute-ReviewProcess
See
Phabricatorhttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16727/#review31454
---
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/metadata/Partition.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16727/#review31455
---
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/metadata/Table.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16727/#review31458
---
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/metadata/Partition.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16727/
---
(Updated Jan. 9, 2014, 9:46 p.m.)
Review request for hive, Thejas Nair and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16727/#review31470
---
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/metadata/Partition.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16727/
---
(Updated Jan. 9, 2014, 10:32 p.m.)
Review request for hive, Thejas Nair and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16727/
---
(Updated Jan. 9, 2014, 1:57 a.m.)
Review request for hive, Thejas Nair and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16727/#review31426
---
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/metadata/Partition.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16727/
---
Review request for hive, Thejas Nair and Xuefu Zhang.
Bugs: HIVE-5446
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16727/#review31338
---
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/metadata/Partition.java
+1 (non-binding)
Its good to use a common review tool and one that's has no third party
dependency.
thanks
Prasad
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.orgwrote:
0
IMO phabricator interface is better than review board, but threat of losing
comments
0
IMO phabricator interface is better than review board, but threat of losing
comments and patches is also real.
Actually, we already lost in few cases, ironically it was RB. Try to read
the very first review request posted on HIVE-1634
Ashutosh
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Yin Huai
/PhabricatorCodeReview
Phabricator now requires an external facebook account to review patches,
and we have no technical support contact where phabricator is hosted. It
also seems like some of the phabricator features are no longer working.
Apache has a review board system many people are already using
of the phabricator features are no longer working.
Apache has a review board system many people are already using.
https://reviews.apache.org/account/login/?next_page=/dashboard/
This vote is to remove the phabricator instructions from the wiki. The
instructions will reference review board
an external facebook account to review patches,
and we have no technical support contact where phabricator is hosted. It
also seems like some of the phabricator features are no longer working.
Apache has a review board system many people are already using.
https://reviews.apache.org/account/login
I would rather us not use phabricator at all. One of the largest reasons is
a fear that if phabricator is shut down we will lose the comments on it. We
can count on the ASF to maintain and backup review board. If it flaky we
can file some tickets with infra or bring this fact up in a board meeting
an external facebook account to review
patches,
and we have no technical support contact where phabricator is hosted.
It
also seems like some of the phabricator features are no longer working.
Apache has a review board system many people are already using.
https://reviews.apache.org/account
features are no longer
working.
Apache has a review board system many people are already using.
https://reviews.apache.org/account/login/?next_page=/dashboard/
This vote is to remove the phabricator instructions from the wiki.
The
instructions will reference review board
to review
patches,
and we have no technical support contact where phabricator is
hosted.
It
also seems like some of the phabricator features are no longer
working.
Apache has a review board system many people are already using.
https://reviews.apache.org/account/login
seems like some of the phabricator features are no longer working.
Apache has a review board system many people are already using.
https://reviews.apache.org/account/login/?next_page=/dashboard/
This vote is to remove the phabricator instructions from the wiki. The
instructions will reference review
requires an external facebook account to review patches,
and we have no technical support contact where phabricator is hosted. It
also seems like some of the phabricator features are no longer working.
Apache has a review board system many people are already using.
https://reviews.apache.org
.
Apache has a review board system many people are already using.
https://reviews.apache.org/account/login/?next_page=/dashboard/
This vote is to remove the phabricator instructions from the wiki. The
instructions will reference review board and that will be the only system
that Hive supports
phabricator is hosted.
It
also seems like some of the phabricator features are no longer working.
Apache has a review board system many people are already using.
https://reviews.apache.org/account/login/?next_page=/dashboard/
This vote is to remove the phabricator instructions from
/display/Hive/PhabricatorCodeReview
Phabricator now requires an external facebook account to review patches,
and we have no technical support contact where phabricator is hosted. It
also seems like some of the phabricator features are no longer working.
Apache has a review board system
On 2011-04-21 07:41:22, Carl Steinbach wrote:
trunk/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/DDLTask.java, line 2080
https://reviews.apache.org/r/566/diff/3/?file=15972#file15972line2080
Same deal here. Can you change this to return a boolean value?
I'm going to follow convention
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/566/
---
(Updated 2011-04-21 22:21:03.518662)
Review request for hive, Yongqiang He and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/566/
---
(Updated 2011-04-19 19:25:22.632716)
Review request for hive, Yongqiang He and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/566/
---
(Updated 2011-04-08 07:19:12.088932)
Review request for hive, Yongqiang He and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/566/
---
Review request for hive, Yongqiang He and namit jain.
Summary
---
Still
36 matches
Mail list logo
