That's really cool.. I was just thinking about it today, and there's already
a solution for it.. Especially with httpd-ssl.conf, it'd have been rally
confusing for the user to configure the port number for http in 2 places..
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailt
Last chance, going once... going twice - need two +1's before I'm willing
to commit this before 1.3.21 rolls. Sure looks BDSS to me.
- Original Message -
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:19 PM
Subject: [Patch 1.3
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/10/03 17:47:50 $]
Release:
2.0.25 : rolled August 29, 2001
2.0.24 : rolled August 18, 2001
2.0.23 : rolled August 9, 2001
2.0.22 : rolled July 29, 2001
2.0.21 : rolle
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/10/03 18:39:38 $]
Release:
1.3.21: In development - Bill Stoddard has proposed a T&R "soon",
(tag scheduled 10/3 2330Z or thereabouts)
1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, 2
From: "Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:24 PM
>
> This patch completely deprectates the Port directive. The ServerName
> directive is now overloaded, so that admins specify the port and name on
> the same directive. It also makes Listen a required directive
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 08:35:04PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> The thing that concerns me the most, is that there is no default Port. If people
> can accept that change, then I think this is the right way to go.
I think you meant there is no default listener.
So what happens with this patch if y
On Wednesday 03 October 2001 08:27 pm, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > This patch completely deprectates the Port directive. The ServerName
> > directive is now overloaded, so that admins specify the port and name
> > on the same directive. It also makes Listen a
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> This patch completely deprectates the Port directive. The ServerName
> directive is now overloaded, so that admins specify the port and name
> on the same directive. It also makes Listen a required directive.
> Pay attention to that. There are no default
This patch completely deprectates the Port directive. The ServerName
directive is now overloaded, so that admins specify the port and name on
the same directive. It also makes Listen a required directive. Pay attention
to that. There are no default ports with this patch. If your config doesn
Nope.
Maintaining a list of base addresses implies some intimate knowledge of the size
of the code segment, which we aren't privy to, and will change over a modules'
lifetime based on the type of compilation and whether it draws in static or
dynamic libraries.
It also presumes perl is installed
on 10/3/01 4:53 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know I was one of the last holdouts that used the old
> src/Configure method, before being converted to APACI.
> Which suddenly makes me wonder.. is there *anyone* that
> still uses src/Configure? Does anyone know if it s
Here is the http_main.c change to fix the compilation error on TPF.
(I omitted the actual patch on my first note.)
It's change is within an "#if defined(HAVE_TPF_CORE_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT)"
block of code so it should not affect any other platforms.
Thank you,
David McCreedy
diff -ru3 before/src/
Here is the http_main.c change to fix the compilation error on TPF.
It's change is within an "#if defined(HAVE_TPF_CORE_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT)"
block of code so it should not affect any other platforms.
Thank you,
David McCreedy
Yes... src/Configure is used on TPF.
And it still works.
-David
Rodent of
I know I was one of the last holdouts that used the old
src/Configure method, before being converted to APACI.
Which suddenly makes me wonder.. is there *anyone* that
still uses src/Configure? Does anyone know if it still
works? :-)
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golu
I'll hold off on the tag for a few hours more.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "David McCreedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:17 PM
Subject: RE: Apache 1.3.21 tag this evening
>
> I'm hitting a fatal compilation error on TPF with
Hi Bill,
> My only problem is that I don't want to even try maintaining such a beast.
> IMHO, it's better if they express their /BASE:"0x" directly.
I'm also too lazy, so I made a quick hack in perl which could do the beast for us.
My idea is using a file modules.def which defines the A
hey guys.
I'm trying to debug a problem with the reverse proxy in the
latest CVS HEAD.
It seems to be handing in ap_proxy_read_string, while doing a blocking
read with 'ap_get_brigade'
Is anyone else having this problem? I'm not doing anything 'smart'
just a plain ProxyPass /test/ http://foo/test
> Maybe filtering needs some pushback so each higher level filter can avoid
> hanging on to bytes it doesn't want or need, and push them back at a lower
> level filter that can keep them in their queue for the next transaction
> within the request or the next request within the connection.
Yes, a
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:33:21PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I am very impressed by this idea for Apache 2.0. But I don't like the
> many to many mapping. If we change your underlying rule here to require
> that each filename extension is passed in sequence, I would be _very_
>
hey guys.
I'm trying to debug a problem with the reverse proxy in the
latest CVS HEAD.
It seems to be handing in ap_proxy_read_string, while doing a blocking
read with 'ap_get_brigade'
Is anyone else having this problem? I'm not doing anything 'smart'
just a plain ProxyPass /test/ http://foo/test
I'm hitting a fatal compilation error on TPF with some "accept mutex" code
what was added.
I was unaware of these changes but believe it was part of the
"make-accept-mutex-method-runtime patch".
(I didn't realize the changes affected TPF-specific code until today.)
I think I have a fix but won't
All,
The following patch lets Apache build on the MacOSX 10.1 platform:
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/apache-1.3/src/Configure,v
retrieving revision 1.433
diff -u -r1.433 Configure
--- Configure 2001/10/03 12:59:03 1.433
+++ C
MPE is still 1.3.x pre-fork only.
As part of my day job, I will start a project in December to update the
bundled Apache server within the MPE OS to the latest & greatest 1.3.x
version. If I have time, I may also investigate 2.x and threading. So far
nobody has yet played with Apache 2.x on MPE
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 11:29 am, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Committed.
Thanks,
Ryan
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 09:20:41PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > We should fix the configure script so that it automatically adds the
> > LoadModule line, just like it did in 1.3.
>
> This patch fixes the proble
From: "Lars Eilebrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:57 AM
> According to Rodent of Unusual Size:
>
> > Negociation is done using the header field values, NOT the
> > URI.
> [...]
> > If the URI is "index.en", an explicitly English variant must
> > match "index
Dear All,
I am a new joinee in this group. I am now working on
CGI-C++ development. I would like to know the C++
libraries, if any, that are supported by Apache 1.3
for this development. I loaded Apache on HP-Unix
version 11 box.
Regards,
Madhu.
--- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
According to Rodent of Unusual Size:
> Negociation is done using the header field values, NOT the
> URI.
[...]
> If the URI is "index.en", an explicitly English variant must
> match "index.en*.en*".
>
> Ordering is an issue for sure, but playing games, by decomposing
> the URI and tryin
Is MPE actually a threaded server, or am I simply confused?
Are there any MULTITHREAD unix ports, or is this only Win32 and Netware?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:51
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:15 AM
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 08:10:11AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Now ... the core input filter can't decide where to break input, it has to allow
> > connection filters to insert themselves and de
You're right.. libcrypto/ssl.a should get linked with mod_ssl.so rather than
httpd. I did try it out initially - with a small hack into the ssl makefile,
but then gave up - as it involved modifying the autoconf script(something
which i don't know).
Thx
-Madhu
-Original Message-
From: Dou
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
>
> > That is, if the URI is index.bak, we can only negociate
> > amongst variants matching index.bak* -- NOT index.*.bak*.
>
> What's your rational? I agree that index[.*].bak[.*] is broader
> than index.bak[.*] --- but I'm wondering why you feel this way?
>
> Sa
Doh --- sorry :) I'll pull that note.
Could all platforms crosscheck the mod_vhost_alias/mod_unique_id changes that
went in? The changes vhost_alias changes _should_ have no discernable effect
on any straight unix ('/' rooted) platform, and the unique_id changes should
only affect MULTITHREAD
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 08:10:11AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Now ... the core input filter can't decide where to break input, it has to allow
> connection filters to insert themselves and decode whatever is read.
>
> That means that the core filter needs to be split, and another line i
I've written an "Announcement" file for 1.3.21 and will commit within the
hour (just got back from dentist)
Mark
#define for gettid() and tid_t have been added to os.h for NetWare
Brad
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:27:56 AM >>>
..after porting Bill Rowe's last mod_negotiation patch to 1.3.
These showstoppers are in the STATUS file...
Netware, OS2, and MPE may require gettid() an
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> So you're saying that libssl.so and libcrypto.so aren't showing up
> when you run ldd on either httpd or mod_ssl.so? Just for reference,
> what is ldd giving you for httpd and mod_ssl.so? (You may not want to
> copy it here, but ldd -v is interesting to
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001 11:27:56 -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote:
>...after porting Bill Rowe's last mod_negotiation patch to 1.3.
>
>These showstoppers are in the STATUS file...
>
>Netware, OS2, and MPE may require gettid() and tid_t definitions in
>those platforms' os.h headers for mod_unique_id.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 08:18:30AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> autoconf guru help needed:
>
> -lssl and -lcrypto are linked with httpd rather than mod_ssl.so
> since httpd does not reference any ssl symbols they are all tossed out and
> mod_ssl.so falls flat on its face:
>
> Cannot load /hom
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:30:02AM -0700, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
wrote:
> You're right.. the bulk of the SSL communication logic is done in churn()..
> The logic basically reads the user data from the filter, gives it to OpenSSL
> thru' the BIO routines, and whatever is output b
...after porting Bill Rowe's last mod_negotiation patch to 1.3.
These showstoppers are in the STATUS file...
Netware, OS2, and MPE may require gettid() and tid_t definitions in
those platforms' os.h headers for mod_unique_id.
Status: Win32 OK. Netware ??. OS2 ??. MPE ??.
Se
autoconf guru help needed:
-lssl and -lcrypto are linked with httpd rather than mod_ssl.so
since httpd does not reference any ssl symbols they are all tossed out and
mod_ssl.so falls flat on its face:
Cannot load /home/dougm/ap/prefork/modules/mod_ssl.so into
server: /home/dougm/ap/prefork/modul
From: "Günter Knauf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:32 AM
> Hi Greg, Bill,
> thanks for the detailed information.
> Now I'm asking me why I did not ask you earlier because I have ~20 modules
> which then better be recompiled...
> I assume that this also applies to Cygwin
Bringing us back from random stream of conciousness... here's the thread
to date (goes back to April, so I suppose a full repost is in order.)
My fresh commentary is inline with Ken's comments below.
- Original Message -
From: "Francis Daly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Rodent of Unusual Size" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:54 AM
> "William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
> >
> > [There is a weakness. We need to evaluate the exception
> > list by component, right now we simply strcmp. There is
> > a note in status to that effect. E.g. r
Hi Greg, Bill,
thanks for the detailed information.
Now I'm asking me why I did not ask you earlier because I have ~20 modules which then
better be recompiled...
I assume that this also applies to Cygwin and perhaps OS2, or? If so then there's a
common interest to have a BaseAddress2.ref for 3rd
Yeah, yeah
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 October 2001 15:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Justin Erenkrantz
Subject: Re: ssl is broken
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 10:11 pm, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:51:09AM -0400, MATHIHALLI,
On Tuesday 02 October 2001 10:11 pm, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 12:51:09AM -0400, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
>wrote:
> > I'm running into all sorts of filter problems. The initial client request
> > is itself not received completely.. For ex., the apr_bucket_
Well, if Novell (who support it) feel that way, I'm inclined
to say 'provide replacement text to be checked in.'
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"All right everyone! Step away from the glowin
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
>
> No. multiviews were created to allow the -client- to
> select one of many variants based on their preferences
> (gzip/no gzip, english or croatian, html or image.)
Not quite. As has been pointed out, 'negociation' is a bad
term for what goes on -- which is t
Hi,
with recent changes to mod_proxy now compilition breaks with CW6, CW5 and gcc give
warnings.
If defining pragma as const char is a problem on other platforms at least a cast it
needed.
In adddition Pavel told me that gcc warns about this:
src/modules/proxy/proxy_http.c:477:4: warning: "/*"
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
>
> [There is a weakness. We need to evaluate the exception
> list by component, right now we simply strcmp. There is
> a note in status to that effect. E.g. requesting index.bak
> -should- match index.html.bak
Um, no, I definitely think not. I think the portion
Sander van Zoest wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Mark J Cox wrote:
>
>
>>What we ought to do is to first decide what the XML output is going to
>>look like (it'll be a pain to change this later), then it doesn't really
>>matter if it's a patch to mod_status or a new module.
>> http://www.awe.com/
From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 12:33 AM
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:34:30PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:29 PM
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:24:25PM -0
From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:09 AM
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Günter Knauf wrote:
> > Hi Bill,
> > can you please explain if every module really needs an entry in BaseAddress.ref? I
>tested with many modules without an entry and
it
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Günter Knauf wrote:
> Hi Bill,
> can you please explain if every module really needs an entry in BaseAddress.ref? I
>tested with many modules without an entry and it seems to work with the linker
>defaults...
> If it is needed how should it be done then
sorry, I forgot the first usage output...
Guenter.
main.c.patch
Hi,
Pl. find my comments below :
>-Original Message-
>From: Justin Erenkrantz
[..snip..]
>/* XXX THIS STUFF NEEDS A MAJOR CLEANUP -RSE XXX */
>So, I'm obviously not the first one to think this and that
>was before the input filters change forced this issue. =)
[..snip..]
True.. it's
Hi Bill,
can you please explain if every module really needs an entry in BaseAddress.ref? I
tested with many modules without an entry and it seems to work with the linker
defaults...
If it is needed how should it be done then with 3rd party modules?
Guenter.
Hi,
as -i / -u are now replaced by -k install / -k uninstall, -h should also list the new
commands.
additional a patch for Win32 httpd.conf which I forgot last time to insert the
LoadModule directives for the added modules.
Guenter.
main.c.patch
httpd.conf.patch
Yeah, mod_ssl's filtering model just isn't meshing well with the
rewrite to the input filtering. Since I think most of us on
the list have come to the consensus that what I committed is
closer to the "right thing" (whatever that pie-in-the-sky may
be), I think we need to consider altering mod_ss
> - on Linux and NetWare I only get the data unformated back, looks as
> there are problems with the scoreboard.xsl or so. Any ideas what's
Yeah, Mozilla isn't very stable at doing the rendering. Most of the
problems you mention are due to the XSLT being done inside the browser.
I'm not real wor
62 matches
Mail list logo
