Re: perl-framework server startup

2002-01-22 Thread Stas Bekman
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: I've played with the returned status, so here is what I saw. If you want to tell shell that the program has failed, you must return a status with at least one bit in the 0x01-0xff range set. Yar, looking at 'man bash' and empirical results, it looks

Re: perl-framework server startup

2002-01-22 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
* On 2002-01-21 at 21:41, Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] excited the electrons to say: OK, be it 0xC8 . Try this patch then: Index: Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestRun.pm === : +# logically OR 0xff to the status,

Re: perl-framework server startup

2002-01-22 Thread Stas Bekman
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: * On 2002-01-21 at 21:41, Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] excited the electrons to say: OK, be it 0xC8 . Try this patch then: Index: Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestRun.pm === : +# logically OR

Re: perl-framework server startup

2002-01-22 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Stas Bekman wrote: Of course, I thought that's what you want, so you can do a binary and and figure out what has failed. Okey, how do a bitwise AND in the shell in a portable way? OK, but harness may fail for different reasons, why do you want to scratch the status code of the failure?

Envariable-selected output filters

2002-01-22 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
From a private emessage someone sent me: Is there a way to use SetEnvIf or SetEnvIfNoCase to detected the presence of a particular HTTP header line (possibly an experimental header line such as X-Exp-Header: special-request) to trigger an external output filter using SetOutputFilter? In

Re: Tagging 1.3.23

2002-01-22 Thread Thomas Eibner
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 02:36:31AM -0500, Victor J. Orlikowski wrote: Hrm.Gave things a second look. Thomas, I think your fix is fine. I will commit it shortly. I think, however, that a more reliable option with the various Linux distributions may be to use the DBM_LIB variable a

Simple (hopefully) new user question

2002-01-22 Thread Grayson Walker
I'm running the Apache under Windoze and have one domain I'm hosting. I've read the documentation on multiple dsns and wonder how many other Windoze users are hosting multiple dsns -- and with what results? and what's the easiest way to get the multiple dsns running? Thanks.

Re: Tagging 1.3.23

2002-01-22 Thread Bill Stoddard
btw, Bill: you can/should still manually tag that .cvsignore to be correct. Done. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/

Re: S_L_U_A for worker MPM?

2002-01-22 Thread Bill Stoddard
The easiest way to remove the S_L_U_A from the worker MPM is to remove all signals from the MPM. 1! Basically, we have a single thread that currently sits in sigwait, which is just waiting for a signal. We then have every other thread sitting in accept waiting for something to wake

Re: Tagging 1.3.23

2002-01-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 on retaging... if Greg's interpretation is correct and we just retag with the same tag. I was confused by what we meant by bump :) :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/

RE: S_L_U_A for worker MPM?

2002-01-22 Thread Ryan Bloom
The easiest way to remove the S_L_U_A from the worker MPM is to remove all signals from the MPM. 1! Basically, we have a single thread that currently sits in sigwait, which is just waiting for a signal. We then have every other thread sitting in accept waiting for something

Re: Tagging 1.3.23

2002-01-22 Thread Bill Stoddard
+1 on retaging... if Greg's interpretation is correct and we just retag with the same tag. I was confused by what we meant by bump :) :) bump is move in this context. You can use the command cvs tag -r yadda APACHE_1_3_23 file.c to move the APACHE_1_3_23 tag to a version 'yadda' of file.c.

Re: Tagging 1.3.23

2002-01-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
I would think that the later would be safer but I've no idea why I think that :) +1 on either :) Bill Stoddard wrote: +1 on retaging... if Greg's interpretation is correct and we just retag with the same tag. I was confused by what we meant by bump :) :) bump is move in this context.

Expires: header prevents caching

2002-01-22 Thread Greg Ames
I tested the URL that Andrzej mentions below. Sho 'nuf, the value of the Expires: headers we send is exactly the same as the value of the Date: header. RFC 2616 says the content can't be cached by proxies in this case. [gregames@gandalf gregames]$ runsocks nc httpd.apache.org 80 HEAD

Re: Simple (hopefully) new user question

2002-01-22 Thread Lars Eilebrecht
According to Grayson Walker: I'm running the Apache under Windoze and have one domain I'm hosting. I've read the documentation on multiple dsns and wonder how many other Windoze users are hosting multiple dsns -- and with what results? and what's the easiest way to get the multiple dsns

Re: APR_BRIGADE_NORMALIZE

2002-01-22 Thread Doug MacEachern
i thought it was added as a workaround during one of the mod_ssl filter rewrites. during the last one i tried removing APR_BRIGADE_NORMALIZE from core.c and all tests in httpd-test passed except for protocol/echo and protocol/nntp_like (which are the same code in the place where the problem

Re: Expires: header prevents caching

2002-01-22 Thread Greg Ames
Greg Ames wrote: I tested the URL that Andrzej mentions below. Sho 'nuf, the value of the Expires: headers we send is exactly the same as the value of the Date: header. RFC 2616 says the content can't be cached by proxies in this case. OK, I see what's happening: [gregames@daedalus

RE: Expires: header prevents caching

2002-01-22 Thread Joshua Slive
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Ames OK, I see what's happening: [gregames@daedalus apache]$ ls /www/httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core* /www/httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core.html.en /www/httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core.html.fr

Re: Tagging 1.3.23

2002-01-22 Thread Victor J. Orlikowski
Cool. Jim or Bill, ball's in your court. Victor -- Victor J. Orlikowski | The Wall is Down, But the Threat Remains! == [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH] ap_rgetline rewrite

2002-01-22 Thread Ryan Morgan
Looks great Justin. The new prototype is much easier to work with. Protocols other than HTTP can benefit from knowing the the apr_status_t from the get_brigade and bucket_read from within ap_getline. This passes my tests, so +1 from me. -Ryan On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 11:26:05PM -0800, Justin

Re: Expires: header prevents caching

2002-01-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 1:32 PM From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Ames OK, I see what's happening: [gregames@daedalus apache]$ ls /www/httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core*

RE: Expires: header prevents caching

2002-01-22 Thread Joshua Slive
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I'm no protcol expert, but that doesn't make sense to me. mod_negotiation should be adding Accept-Language to the Vary: header (yep, it's doing that), but it shouldn't be setting Expires, should it? Proxies should be free to

Re: Tagging 1.3.23

2002-01-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
At 2:40 PM -0500 1/22/02, Victor J. Orlikowski wrote: Cool. Jim or Bill, ball's in your court. I'll let Bill take it, unless he wants/needs a break :) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|]

Re: Expires: header prevents caching

2002-01-22 Thread Greg Ames
Joshua Slive wrote: I'm no protcol expert, but that doesn't make sense to me. mod_negotiation should be adding Accept-Language to the Vary: header (yep, it's doing that), but it shouldn't be setting Expires, should it? Proxies should be free to cache the page, conditional on the

RE: Expires: header prevents caching

2002-01-22 Thread Joshua Slive
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Ames and yes, HTTP version does make a difference: Yes, you are right. My test was flawed. Everything seems to be working properly. Joshua.