flood STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/01/17 01:09:45 $]
Release:
milestone-04: In development
milestone-03: Tagged January 16, 2002
ASF-transfer: Released July 17, 2001
milestone-02: Tagged August 13, 2001
I received 3 +1s to make JRE_1 .32, so it became 2.0.32 (with a
CVS tag of APACHE_2_0_32).
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.0.32-alpha.tar.gz
Committers and non-committers, please vote for beta from this
tarball. Once it is approved as a beta, the formal release notes
will be made with
Anyone seen this before? Libtool 1.4.2 doesn't work on OS/X and the modules
produced with Apache 2.0 are actually DYLIB(s) and not MH_BUNDLE(s), thus
preventing the APR routines to read them...
There seems to be a screwup with glibtool's -module parameter...
Pier
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone seen this before? Libtool 1.4.2 doesn't work on OS/X and the modules
produced with Apache 2.0 are actually DYLIB(s) and not MH_BUNDLE(s), thus
preventing the APR routines to read them...
There seems to be a screwup with glibtool's -module
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I received 3 +1s to make JRE_1 .32, so it became 2.0.32 (with a
CVS tag of APACHE_2_0_32).
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.0.32-alpha.tar.gz
Committers and non-committers, please vote for beta from this
tarball. Once it is approved as
From testing on Windows, I am +1 for beta.
Bill
I received 3 +1s to make JRE_1 .32, so it became 2.0.32 (with a
CVS tag of APACHE_2_0_32).
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.0.32-alpha.tar.gz
Committers and non-committers, please vote for beta from this
tarball. Once it is
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
From testing on Windows, I am +1 for beta.
First I noticed that the KEYS file is missing from the tar file.
Second perchild doesn't compile, but see attached mpm_perchild.patch for the fix ;)
It basically does a int num_sockets and add the POD
I'm getting this in my error log on every request.
[Thu Feb 14 09:13:38 2002] [debug]
D:\CodeProjects\httpd-2.0.32-JRE-1\server\protocol.c(604): [client
127.0.0.1] (32560)Connection timed out: read_request_line() failed
I built the server with the JRE-1 tarball yesterday. The target is a
Jeff Trawick wrote:
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not even starting up... Once I launch it, the first child dies, and no
workers are left to process requests... Now trying with threaded...
Seems to be working fine. But was wondering what the SHUTDOWN EVENT
SIGNALED means. Is this expected behavior during startup?
Tks
Dwayne
[Thu Feb 14 09:43:14 2002] [info] Parent: Marked listeners as not
inheritable.
[Thu Feb 14 09:43:14 2002] [info] Parent: Created child process 372
[Thu
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone seen this before? Libtool 1.4.2 doesn't work on OS/X and the modules
produced with Apache 2.0 are actually DYLIB(s) and not MH_BUNDLE(s), thus
preventing the APR routines to read them...
There seems to be a
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 09:50:18AM -0500, Dwayne Miller wrote:
I'm getting this in my error log on every request.
[Thu Feb 14 09:13:38 2002] [debug]
D:\CodeProjects\httpd-2.0.32-JRE-1\server\protocol.c(604): [client
127.0.0.1] (32560)Connection timed out: read_request_line() failed
I
I just bumped the debug level to see if I could figure out the odd
behavior from Mozilla. It looks like others are having similar problems
with regard to incomplete posts/requests.
Thanks for the reply, though it means I need to start looking elswhere
for the cause of my problems...
Justin
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 10:57:32AM -0500, Dwayne Miller wrote:
I just bumped the debug level to see if I could figure out the odd
behavior from Mozilla. It looks like others are having similar problems
with regard to incomplete posts/requests.
Ah, fine. Do you have any details about this?
Sorry for posting this here, but i got no answer elsewhere.
Abstract: when I use pass-through (?) proxying in apache to itself (to
achive a 2nd round of processing a request) cookies are lost.
Thanks!
-- original letter:
Hi,
on an Apache-Tomcat-JBoss stack I've run into the
There is a 10min lag between when the server was started and the server getting
notified
to shutdown, so I'm not really sure what your question is...
Bill
Seems to be working fine. But was wondering what the SHUTDOWN EVENT
SIGNALED means. Is this expected behavior during startup?
Tks
So far, I have this happening...
1) A request for a plain HTML file results in raw HTML being displayed
in the browser. The same browser, same page, with 1.3.20 works fine.
This might be a config file problem on my end. But I'm not sure what
to look for. Same thing happens when I try a
Hi,
I have done the configure:
./configure --prefix=/export/home/apache20/apache32 \
--enable-mods-shared=all
It fails:
+++
configure:3147: gcc -c -g -O2 -pthreads -DSOLARIS2=8 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS
-D_REENTRANT -I/export/home/apache20/httpd-2.0.32/srclib/apr/include
At 09:37 AM 02/14/2002, Jeroen Massar wrote:
First I noticed that the KEYS file is missing from the tar file.
The KEYS should not be in the tar file. You have to get the KEYS
from a trusted source, and the file you are attempting to verify is
not a trusted source, otherwise you wouldn't be
Too much diet Coke this morning I guess. Didn't notice the time and
thought it was part of the startup.
Bill Stoddard wrote:
There is a 10min lag between when the server was started and the server getting
notified
to shutdown, so I'm not really sure what your question is...
Bill
Seems to
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 05:20:17PM +0100, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have done the configure:
./configure --prefix=/export/home/apache20/apache32 \
--enable-mods-shared=all
Change this to --enable-mods-shared=most
all means enable all modules and report failures
most means
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:37:36PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Second perchild doesn't compile, but see attached mpm_perchild.patch for the fix ;)
It is known that perchild doesn't work everywhere. It is currently very
non-portable. It's on our (my) todo list. If you manage to make it
work for
... does not compile, see http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/apache.txt
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/
From: Sebastian Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:25 AM
... does not compile, see http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/apache.txt
gen_test_char complains apr.h can't be included - but it didn't build the apr target
yet? Of course it can't. But the gen_test_char
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
... does not compile, see http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/apache.txt
Stupid me, due to all the happiness over my new box I checked out
apr and apr-util into httpd-2.0, not httpd-2.0/srclib/.
Sorry for bothering,
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Bergmann
From: Sebastian Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:02 PM
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Stupid me, due to all the happiness over my new box I checked out
apr and apr-util into httpd-2.0, not httpd-2.0/srclib/.
Perhaps we need a PreBuild.dsp target that invokes
Speaking of pre-build setup... where are the instructions for including
openssl into the build tree. I know I need to copy the openssl tree
into the srclib directory, and things work well until the link phase.
Under Win32, the two openssl .lib files are not found. They are in the
It has been suggested to me by some folks I work with that it would make
sense to add a ReverseProxy on/off directive to 2.0 mod_proxy. I agree
that it seems to make sense from both a security and Law of Least
Astonishment standpoint, but it would affect the default config and/or
doc of
Hi folks. I'm mostly an Apache user instead of a developer, but think I
can communicate about this issue well enough to talk to this list (let me
know if I'm wrong).
Mainly, I want to see what there is to be done about issues surrounding
suexec and resource limitations for its child processes.
Chuck Murcko wrote:
It has been suggested to me by some folks I work with that it would make
sense to add a ReverseProxy on/off directive to 2.0 mod_proxy. I agree
that it seems to make sense from both a security and Law of Least
Astonishment standpoint, but it would affect the default
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 09:45:10AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
According to RFC2616, a content-type SHOULD be present. If it is not
present, then the client can either guess what it is based on file
extension or looking at a few bytes, otherwise it should be
application/octet-stream.
So -
I came across this problem while I tried to debug a IPv6 version of
apache...
If Apache performs a double-reverse lookup, for instance because a
resource was protected by
Allow from .my.domain
then it is possible that an initial reverse lookup for the client IP
returns a host name, but the
I've gotten this error message with httpd-2.0 cvs tag, and the JRE_1 .32
beta tarball consitently and religously.
uname -a
FreeBSD p6m7g8.student.umd.edu 4.5-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE #0: Mon Feb
11 15:21:10 EST 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/PHILIP i386
You can of course fix it
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0800, Sander Temme wrote:
Can you send me a traceroute from where you are? I can't promise that I can
do anything with it, but it'll be interesting to know where the packets flow
when they are so slow.
Funny, I just tried it and it seems to be fast as hell
According to Chuck Murcko:
So what do you think?
Hmm... I'm not sure.
Can you give some examples where this directive will be useful?
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht - The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Alan Kay
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 05:44:22PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
I'm willing to code a patch which allows Apache to run in the foreground in
its own session. Currently it kills the pgrp it is in even though it didn't
create it (bad practice imo - only destroy what you create). That is, if there
is
v31+jre patch
syscall seconds calls errors
read .801834285
write.14 172
open1.151924 22
close 1.342563
stat .06 249
fstat.431406
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:19:54PM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote:
[...]
same configuration/same source code/same docroot.
by my calcs v31 now does 14 mutex locks per read
as opposed to v29 5 locks per read
I'm thinking that the shared memory changes have made my machine
into a furnace.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 11:26:13AM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote:
Fine, I'll add it to any beta release notes. But, geesh. How many
people are bumping the LogLevel to debug? -- justin
most of the people over here do for some stupid reason.
and the line got noticed over here and caused a
Hello Aaron,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:01:11PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Test it and give it your blessing.
+2
;-)
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/Santa Clara, CA
_/ _/ _/
_/ _/_/_/
Chuck Murcko wrote:
It has been suggested to me by some folks I work with that it would make
sense to add a ReverseProxy on/off directive to 2.0 mod_proxy. I agree
that it seems to make sense from both a security and Law of Least
Astonishment standpoint, but it would affect the default
Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:19:54PM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote:
[...]
same configuration/same source code/same docroot.
by my calcs v31 now does 14 mutex locks per read
as opposed to v29 5 locks per read
I'm thinking that the shared memory changes have made my machine
Yep. mod_mem_cache definitly needs work in this area. It was on my todo list after we
finished getting the mod_cache architecture nailed down (it's getting closer).
I'm sure similar problems exist in the disk_cache (and in Apache 1.3 mod_proxy as
well).
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 08:50:52PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
found a config difference.
v29 had the following:
export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libmtmalloc.so
So toss me a clue.. what does this mean?
Ian was using the mtmalloc for .29 and the standard malloc library
for .32. You'd want to
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 08:50:52PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
found a config difference.
v29 had the following:
export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libmtmalloc.so
So toss me a clue.. what does this mean?
Ian was using the mtmalloc for .29 and the standard malloc library
both of these test have been run with the MTMALLOC library installed
http://webperf.org/a2/v31/2002-02-11-v29/
http://webperf.org/a2/v31/2002-02-12-v31/
without the MTMALLOC library these are the results from v31
http://webperf.org/a2/v31/2002-02-11-v31/
ok.. I've added a breif explanation
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:01:11PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Basicly what we have now is the following flags:
-DNO_DETACH - assume we are not the process group leader, just create
a new session (or pgrp if setsid() is not supported).
This detaches us from the
47 matches
Mail list logo
