On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:47:52PM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> > > Well, this is very promising. The first thing we'd really like is a
> > > mailing list. What's the SOP for getting one created? Or is there
> > > something else that needs to happen bef
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > Well, this is very promising. The first thing we'd really like is a
> > mailing list. What's the SOP for getting one created? Or is there
> > something else that needs to happen before that can be done?
> >
> > I figure we should get moving while we'r
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
> I just stumbled upon OProfile, a relatively new profiling tool
> for Linux/x86 that works well with Apache:
>
> http://oprofile.sourceforge.net/
Nice! I'm definitely going to check this out, especially for the icache
and bpred numbers...
---
I just stumbled upon OProfile, a relatively new profiling tool
for Linux/x86 that works well with Apache:
http://oprofile.sourceforge.net/
It's a sampling profiler, like gprof, but it's completely external
to the app being measured--no recompilation needed. It's implemented
as a kernel module t
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 04:46:58PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> Should we make this part of the Docs project, and then if it starts
> generating enough traffic it can be moved to its own list?
+1. -- justin
> Well, this is very promising. The first thing we'd really like is a
> mailing list. What's the SOP for getting one created? Or is there
> something else that needs to happen before that can be done?
>
> I figure we should get moving while we're motivated, before real life
> intrudes.
Should we
Re: Apache History project, several folks wrote:
> +1
Well, this is very promising. The first thing we'd really like is a
mailing list. What's the SOP for getting one created? Or is there
something else that needs to happen before that can be done?
I figure we should get moving while we're moti
Brian Pane wrote:
> Sorry about that. I just committed a change that should fix
> the problem (the precompiled list of strmatch patterns wasn't
> properly terminated).
The segfault is gone, thanks.
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Current HEAD segfaults on Win32 on requests that involve CGI (PHP),
> static HTML files are served without crashing.
>
> Stacktrace is as follows:
>
>ap_make_content_type(request_rec * 0x005786e8, const char * 0x00571e88)
>line 171 + 19 bytes
>
Sorry about that. I
Current HEAD segfaults on Win32 on requests that involve CGI (PHP),
static HTML files are served without crashing.
Stacktrace is as follows:
ap_make_content_type(request_rec * 0x005786e8, const char * 0x00571e88)
line 171 + 19 bytes
ap_http_header_filter(ap_filter_t * 0x005778f8, apr_bucke
12 matches
Mail list logo
