Hmmm... The problem is that an all whitespace content-length value is
noted as an error. I would agree that if that is the case, Apache
should default to setting it to 0. This is easy to work around.
Since I've already added the ProtocolReqCheck directive, would people
think it's a good idea to
I'm going to do a start the TR process on thursday for a 2.0.40 release
so if you've got things which you want in there and are stable
(apr_poll) comes to mind please commit them.
If all goes well we should have a tarball out the door this time next week.
Regards
Ian
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 10:21:11AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
we would need to check errno just for ERANGE and then adjust the endstr
check as well... Or else just keep the test as is, and allow for
all blank beforehand. I think I'd prefer this method, since it
provides a specific solution
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:31:53AM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Did anyone check this one out? (I haven't) It sounds
as though it would scratch some itches..
Not many other itches, by the looks of things :-(
On the assumption that it would be convenient to make available a
version
I'm going to do a start the TR process on thursday for a 2.0.40 release
so if you've got things which you want in there and are stable
(apr_poll) comes to mind please commit them.
If all goes well we should have a tarball out the door this time
next week.
Regards
Ian
I'll try to run a
At 12:18 PM 7/9/2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
I'm going to do a start the TR process on thursday for a 2.0.40 release
so if you've got things which you want in there and are stable
(apr_poll) comes to mind please commit them.
Ian
I'll try to run a profile on the new apr_poll code posted
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:18 PM 7/9/2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
I'm going to do a start the TR process on thursday for a 2.0.40
release
so if you've got things which you want in there and are stable
(apr_poll) comes to mind please commit them.
Ian
I'll try to run a profile
WTF? -1 Jim, that code is doing an error check prior to the
strtol. It is not looking for the start of the number, but
ensuring that the number is non-negative and all digits prior
to calling the library routine. A simple check of *lenp would
have been sufficient for the blank case.
I need
This patch sets the calls to OpenSCManager and OpenService to use the
minimum required privileges.
Index: service.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/server/mpm/winnt/service.c,v
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -3 -r1.56
At 01:40 PM 7/9/2002, you wrote:
This patch sets the calls to OpenSCManager and OpenService to use the
minimum required privileges.
Cool. Could you cvs up to grab the latest version with Mladen's patch,
compare your suggested changes to his latest changes for requested
privileges, and provide
while looking at another bug I stumbled onto us not setting the query
string here.. (where we set the unescaped one) I was wondering if this
was by design..
Index: mod_include.c
===
RCS file:
While we are debating the best way to accomplish this Content-Length fix for the next
release, I kind of need to have it working for me right now in the current released
version. Therefore I've implemented this partial fix against 1.3.26 on my system:
root@nueva[391] pwd
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
WTF? -1 Jim, that code is doing an error check prior to the
strtol. It is not looking for the start of the number, but
ensuring that the number is non-negative and all digits prior
to calling the library routine. A simple check of *lenp would
have been
David Burry wrote:
While we are debating the best way to accomplish this Content-Length fix for the
next release, I kind of need to have it working for me right now in the current
released version. Therefore I've implemented this partial fix against 1.3.26 on my
system:
The current CVS
Bill Stoddard wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:18 PM 7/9/2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
I'm going to do a start the TR process on thursday for a 2.0.40
release
so if you've got things which you want in there and are stable
(apr_poll) comes to mind
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like you think this is for
ApacheMonitor. This is for the winnt mpm itself.
I thought your patch this morning was for the mpm just as I believe you
think this is for the monitor.
Shane
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:40 PM 7/9/2002, you wrote:
I have a situation where I have an external-facing apache server proxying to another
apache server inside a firewall. I've updated the proxying one to Apache 1.3.26 so
that it won't get hacked due to the chunked encoding bug, but I'm not able to upgrade
the other one behind the firewall for
At 07:27 PM 7/9/2002, you wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like you think this is for
ApacheMonitor. This is for the winnt mpm itself.
I thought your patch this morning was for the mpm just as I believe you
think this is for the monitor.
Yup... That would be it.
Thanks for the
18 matches
Mail list logo