Hi,
I am using php scripting & publishing web documents through apache.
I am creating /etc/ppp/a file.& I am facing access problem . I know as I am not "root" User ,So i am facing this problem.
But if i changed User to "root" ,it may create security hole for my documents...
Is
Well, it didn't, but then we have an extra item on the pollset on top of the
num_listening_sockets so that's probably why.
david
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > Modified:server/mpm/beos beos.c
> > Log:
> > Adjust the sizes of the pollsets we create/use so
> -Original Message-
> From: David Shane Holden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 8:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PATCH] ApacheMonitor.c
>
>
> This patch fixes AM where it throws an error window when
> trying to control the service for lack of query
This patch fixes AM where it throws an error window when trying to control
the service for lack of query status access.
I don't want Mladen to feel like I'm stepping on his toes, but I really
don't like
using the generic access unless there's a good reason to. So I changed
all the
service ca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a simple example as how to read 'across' bucket brigades.
mod_bucket_brigade does this I think.
>
> I.e. looking at mod_include I do not quite understand what happens if
> something matches partially at the last bucked of a brigade - and sits
> across the n
Is there a simple example as how to read 'across' bucket brigades.
I.e. looking at mod_include I do not quite understand what happens if
something matches partially at the last bucked of a brigade - and sits
across the next call to the filter.
Or is there some reason this never happens ?
Dw
-
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Greg Ames wrote:
> Thanks for cleaning up STATUS. I had forgotten about this entry.
np ... I had too. I saw it on RoUS's weekly STATUS emailing. :)
--Cliff
> From: Ian Holsman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> > Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I know that there has been some talk of doing a release next week.
I
> >>just ran my test suite, and we seem to be failing some mod_access
> >>checks. I think it has to
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>I know that there has been some talk of doing a release next week. I
>>just ran my test suite, and we seem to be failing some mod_access
>>checks. I think it has to do with the table re-write, but I haven't
>>looked at it in e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> gregames fixed this in APR a while back, I believe.
yes.
>RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
>
> -* apr_sendfile() is broken on FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE as of 20020627 (and
> - presumably more leading edge levels) because of a "fix" in the kernel.
> - Apache 2
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Modified:server/mpm/beos beos.c
> Log:
> Adjust the sizes of the pollsets we create/use so that we work
again.
>
> With the poll change we seem to have improved performance. :)
This change scares me a bit. The code is supposed
FYI for those who might be interested... David Ashley has released mod_rexx
on IBM DeveloperWorks.
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/projects/modrexx
Here is the summary from the url:
"Mod_Rexx is similar to other Apache language processor modules such as
mod_perl or mod_php. It brings the
> > I'm thinking that I might try to implement a M_HEAD, why has this been
> > discarded in favor for M_GET with header_only?
>
>Because M_GET and M_HEAD are implemented the same way through the whole
>server -- the only difference is that if (r->header_only), we skip sending
>the body. But othe
Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know that there has been some talk of doing a release next week. I
> just ran my test suite, and we seem to be failing some mod_access
> checks. I think it has to do with the table re-write, but I haven't
> looked at it in enough detail to be 100% su
14 matches
Mail list logo
