Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 libhttpd.dsp

2002-07-17 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:39 AM 7/18/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >wrowe 2002/07/17 23:39:06 > Revision ChangesPath > 1.49 +134 -154 httpd-2.0/libhttpd.dsp David... I knocked out the header you pointed out, along with a number of duplicated entries for the headers we now move about into includ

[PATCH] libhttpd.dsp

2002-07-17 Thread David Shane Holden
Removes the long ago deleted mpm_status.h from the project file. Shane Index: libhttpd.dsp === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/libhttpd.dsp,v retrieving revision 1.48 diff -u -r1.48 libhttpd.dsp --- libhttpd.dsp13 J

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

2002-07-17 Thread Brian Pane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On 17 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >>trawick 2002/07/17 15:15:01 >> >> Modified:.STATUS >> Log: >> somebody please tell me I don't know how to read C code anymore >> >> (I guess the pool for an Apache socket will grow on every read/writ

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

2002-07-17 Thread rbb
On 17 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > trawick 2002/07/17 15:15:01 > > Modified:.STATUS > Log: > somebody please tell me I don't know how to read C code anymore > > (I guess the pool for an Apache socket will grow on every read/write > operation that would block.)

[STATUS] (apache-1.3) Wed Jul 17 23:45:05 EDT 2002

2002-07-17 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2002/06/27 20:57:21 $] Release: 1.3.27-dev: In development 1.3.26: Tagged June 18, 2002. 1.3.25: Tagged June 17, 2002. Not released. 1.3.24: Tagged Mar 21, 2002. Announced Mar 22, 20

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Jul 17 23:45:09 EDT 2002

2002-07-17 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2002/07/17 22:15:00 $] Release: 2.0.40 : in development. 2.0.39 : rolled June 17, 2002. 2.0.38 : rolled June 16, 2002. not released. 2.0.37 : rolled June 11, 2002. not releas

Re: daedalus is running httpd-2.0.pre40

2002-07-17 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 08:33 PM 7/17/2002, Greg Ames wrote: >...since Wednesday, 17-Jul-2002 18:49:31 PDT . Things look fine now, but we >took about a 3 1/2 minute site outage because of: > >[Wed Jul 17 18:47:20 2002] [error] (2)No such file or directory: could not >open mime types config file /usr/local/apache/conf

Re: FileDescriptorLimit & ScriptsockBacklog

2002-07-17 Thread Tsuyoshi SASAMOTO
>> Also, how about "ScriptsockBacklog" - to specify the backlog number >> of the cgid socket. > >+1, but can you figure out what is messed up with the parts of your >patch to add ScriptsockBacklog? The patch shows a lot of lines >changed when they look the same (whitespace inadvertently changed I

daedalus is running httpd-2.0.pre40

2002-07-17 Thread Greg Ames
...since Wednesday, 17-Jul-2002 18:49:31 PDT . Things look fine now, but we took about a 3 1/2 minute site outage because of: [Wed Jul 17 18:47:20 2002] [error] (2)No such file or directory: could not open mime types config file /usr/local/apache/conf/mime.types. Configuration Failed That's t

Re: [PATCH] ftp proxy by IPv6

2002-07-17 Thread Shoichi Sakane
> > your question means if i can modify ftp proxy to use the > > function ap_proxy_connect_to_backend() ? > yes, that was my original question... i can't say yes, but if i will be able to have a free time and if the issue will remain, then i will try it. > I just committed your patch with very m

Re: [PATCH] mod_rewrite and cookie setting

2002-07-17 Thread Brian Degenhardt
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:15:41PM -0700, Adam Sussman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 10:26:49AM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote: > > Adam Sussman wrote: > > > The new cookie setting feature of mod_rewrite adds the Set-Cookie header > > > to r->headers_out. Shouldn't this be r->err_headers_out instead

Re: environment in mod_ext_filter

2002-07-17 Thread Craig Sebenik
Quoting Jeff Trawick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Craig Sebenik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is there a reason why the environment is null? > probably because I'm a moron :) :) *Probably*??? You're not sure? :) > > Am I missing something? Is there a reason I shouldn't submit this patch? > > no,

Re: [PATCH] C-L POST body wouldn't report EOS

2002-07-17 Thread Brian Pane
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:48:52PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > >>Attached is a patch that should allow ap_get_brigade() modules to >>determine EOS on the same roundtrip as the last read of the request >>body contents. >> >> > >+1. -- justin > I haven't

Re: [PATCH] C-L POST body wouldn't report EOS

2002-07-17 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:48:52PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Attached is a patch that should allow ap_get_brigade() modules to > determine EOS on the same roundtrip as the last read of the request > body contents. +1. -- justin

[PATCH] C-L POST body wouldn't report EOS

2002-07-17 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Attached is a patch that should allow ap_get_brigade() modules to determine EOS on the same roundtrip as the last read of the request body contents. Right now, the caller won't receive an EOS. Coupled with our useless r->remaining req_rec member, there is no way to determine if there is no data

Re: [PATCH] ftp proxy by IPv6

2002-07-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
Shoichi Sakane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > your question means if i can modify ftp proxy to use the > function ap_proxy_connect_to_backend() ? yes, that was my original question... I just committed your patch with very minor modifications. -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell

``List-Unsubscribe''

2002-07-17 Thread rahul katariya
_ Webdunia Quiz Contest - Limited Time Unlimited Fun.Log on to quiz.webdunia.com and win fabulous prizes. India's first multilingual mailing system: Get your Free e-mail account at www.epatra.com

Re: Apache 1.3.26 on 64 bit Windows machines

2002-07-17 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 12:03 PM 7/17/2002, Mark Nelson wrote: >Is Apache 1.3.26 safe to build/run on 64 bit Windows platforms? As a 32 bit app? Yes. Short of that, it has many, many problems building on Win64. We aren't investing any further effort [aside from bug fixes] for the 1.3/win32 port. The Win64 effort

Apache 1.3.26 on 64 bit Windows machines

2002-07-17 Thread Mark Nelson
Is Apache 1.3.26 safe to build/run on 64 bit Windows platforms? Thanks! Mark

Re: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

2002-07-17 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 07:23:08AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > Why isn't this being detected by autoconf? SysV semaphore support > > isn't perfect yet and has some problems. > > Because this is Apache 1.3 which doesn't use autoconf. :-) This is my brain -= sleep. :) -aaron

RE: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

2002-07-17 Thread Ryan Bloom
> From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:31:44AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > does everybody agree that this is preferable? > > Why isn't this being detected by autoconf? SysV semaphore support > isn't perfect yet and has some problems. Because this is

Re: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

2002-07-17 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:31:44AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > does everybody agree that this is preferable? Why isn't this being detected by autoconf? SysV semaphore support isn't perfect yet and has some problems. -aaron > Index: src/include/ap_config.h > ===

Re: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

2002-07-17 Thread Henning Brauer
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:31:44AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > does everybody agree that this is preferable? > > Index: src/include/ap_config.h > === > RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/include/ap_config.h,v > retrieving revision 1

Re: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

2002-07-17 Thread Jim Jagielski
Jeff Trawick wrote: > > does everybody agree that this is preferable? > > Index: src/include/ap_config.h > === > RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/include/ap_config.h,v > retrieving revision 1.323 > diff -u -r1.323 ap_config.h > --

Re: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

2002-07-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 08:42:33AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > I would have thought you would add > > > > #if defined __OpenBSD__ > > #define HAVE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT > > #endif > > > > since you have flock too. > > > > If you want to

Re: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

2002-07-17 Thread Jim Jagielski
Henning Brauer wrote: > > > Why the "#else" part? Does OpenBSD lack flock() or is it because of > > the new 'chroot' that your version does, but the .org doesn't. If the > > latter, I'd prefer allowing both with the official ASF code. > > oversight on our part. > I just commited a fix. > > floc

Re: [PATCH] Patch to compile apache-1.3.20+ on LynxOS-3.0.1

2002-07-17 Thread Jim Jagielski
At 8:49 AM +0200 7/17/02, Fulvio Bille` wrote: >Hi, >I have LynxOS-3.0.1 and if you try to use find with -depth obtain a syntax >error! > >>find . -depth -print >find: syntax error at -depth > >Maybe it is possible (I don't try to do this) to install the GNU findutils and >this can resolve the pro

Re: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

2002-07-17 Thread Henning Brauer
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:22:54PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > flock works with out chroot, but we don't want www-writeable files inside > the chroot, so we default to sysvsem. flock works with our chroot, that is.

Re: [PATCH] autoconf macros: quote macro names

2002-07-17 Thread Peter Poeml
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 03:50:45PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:01:10PM +0200, Peter Poeml wrote: > > Hi, > > > > in the autoconf macro definitions of acinclude.m4, the macro names are > > not quoted as suggested in the autoconf documentation for AC_DEFUN: > > >

Re: [PATCH] 64bit compiler issues

2002-07-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
Peter Poeml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The stderr output of make (using gcc 3.1.1 20020708) is this: a number of these are easily fixable and don't deal with passing an int in a ptr field... I'll see what I can do this a.m. and you get to see how many of my attempts actually helped :) -- J

Re: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

2002-07-17 Thread Henning Brauer
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 09:18:34AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Henning Brauer wrote: > > > > sorry if this appears twice, first one seems not to have made it. > > > > we have sysvsem on OpenBSD and applied the following patch to ap_config.h > > in our tree - would be nice to have it in the ap

Re: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

2002-07-17 Thread Jim Jagielski
Henning Brauer wrote: > > sorry if this appears twice, first one seems not to have made it. > > we have sysvsem on OpenBSD and applied the following patch to ap_config.h > in our tree - would be nice to have it in the apache.org tree as well. this > is for apache 1.3. > > Index: src/include/ap

Re: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

2002-07-17 Thread Henning Brauer
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 08:42:33AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > I would have thought you would add > > #if defined __OpenBSD__ > #define HAVE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT > #endif > > since you have flock too. > > If you want to force sysvsem be the default, add > > #define USE_SYSVSEM_SE

Re: [PATCH] make pathnames in ssl-std.conf configurable

2002-07-17 Thread Peter Poeml
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 03:54:36PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:57:05PM +0200, Peter Poeml wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to propose to create ssl-std.conf from ssl-std.conf.in, just as > > it is done with httpd-std.conf.in. Then, the log file paths could be > >

Re: FileDescriptorLimit & ScriptsockBacklog (was: [PATCH] increase file descriptor limit automatically at httpd start up)

2002-07-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
Tsuyoshi SASAMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about to make a new directive such as "FileDescriptorLimit"? I think this was solved differently. > Also, how about "ScriptsockBacklog" - to specify the backlog number > of the cgid socket. +1, but can you figure out what is messed up with th

Re: [PATCH] 64bit compiler issues

2002-07-17 Thread Peter Poeml
Hi, On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 06:01:08PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 10:31:46AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > At 07:23 PM 7/15/2002, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > > >We could force the size, by using apr_int32_t. The problem that he is > > There is no need to force the

Re: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

2002-07-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > we have sysvsem on OpenBSD and applied the following patch to ap_config.h > in our tree - would be nice to have it in the apache.org tree as well. this > is for apache 1.3. > > Index: src/include/ap_config.h >

[PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

2002-07-17 Thread Henning Brauer
sorry if this appears twice, first one seems not to have made it. we have sysvsem on OpenBSD and applied the following patch to ap_config.h in our tree - would be nice to have it in the apache.org tree as well. this is for apache 1.3. Index: src/include/ap_config.h =

Re: access problem , can not create file in the /etc/ppp

2002-07-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
rahul katariya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, I am using php scripting & publishing web documents through apache. Appropriate venues for this sort of help are described at http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html#http-users good luck! -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell...

Re: environment in mod_ext_filter

2002-07-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
Craig Sebenik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In modules/experimental/mod_ext_filter.c there's the following: > > rc = apr_proc_create(ctx->proc, > ctx->filter->command, > (const char * const *)ctx->filter->args, >