RE: quick_handler hook is completely bogus.

2002-07-30 Thread Ryan Bloom
> From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > I'm approaching this from a caching perspective, so when a module uses > > quick_handler for non-caching mechanisms, my comments do not apply but > > here's an option: > > > > FWIW, quick_handler was added to the server to enable more effici

RE: quick_handler hook is completely bogus.

2002-07-30 Thread Bill Stoddard
> I'm approaching this from a caching perspective, so when a module uses > quick_handler for non-caching mechanisms, my comments do not apply but > here's an option: > FWIW, quick_handler was added to the server to enable more efficient content caching. Graham modified mod_proxy to use it (and it

RE: quick_handler hook is completely bogus.

2002-07-30 Thread Bill Stoddard
> I realize that this is a strong statement, but I believe that I can back > it up. My reasons for not liking this hook at all: > > 1) If I have a page that I have served and it gets put in the cache, > then it will be served out of the quick_handler phase. However, if I > then add or modify a

RE: quick_handler hook is completely bogus.

2002-07-30 Thread Ryan Bloom
> > 1) If I have a page that I have served and it gets put in the cache, > > then it will be served out of the quick_handler phase. However, if I > > then add or modify a .htaccess file to deny access to that page, > > then my changes won't be honored until the page expires from the > > cache.

Re: quick_handler hook is completely bogus.

2002-07-30 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Ryan Bloom wrote: > > 1) If I have a page that I have served and it gets put in the cache, > then it will be served out of the quick_handler phase. However, if I > then add or modify a .htaccess file to deny access to that page, > then my changes won't be honored until the page expires from the

Re: quick_handler hook is completely bogus.

2002-07-30 Thread Brian Degenhardt
I'm approaching this from a caching perspective, so when a module uses quick_handler for non-caching mechanisms, my comments do not apply but here's an option: What if modules were required to set the Vary: header appropriately and have mod_cache_* honor it? This way, you're caching problem is f

Re: cvs commit: httpd-ldap/ldap-cache util_ldap.c util_ldap_cache.h

2002-07-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > trawick 2002/07/30 12:38:11 > > Modified:.CHANGES >ldap-aaa mod_auth_ldap.c >ldap-cache util_ldap.c util_ldap_cache.h > Log: > support non-threaded configurations > > PR: 10920 FYI... I did not te

quick_handler hook is completely bogus.

2002-07-30 Thread Ryan Bloom
I realize that this is a strong statement, but I believe that I can back it up. My reasons for not liking this hook at all: 1) If I have a page that I have served and it gets put in the cache, then it will be served out of the quick_handler phase. However, if I then add or modify a .htaccess

SV: mysqlsupport for virtuals.

2002-07-30 Thread Jonas Eriksson
Well.. I want it to work with apache 2.0x but thanks anyway. -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Jacob Rief [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Skickat: den 30 juli 2002 14:20 Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ämne: Re: mysqlsupport for virtuals. I did some work on this. I am using mod_rewrite and do a dy

Re: mysqlsupport for virtuals.

2002-07-30 Thread Jacob Rief
I did some work on this. I am using mod_rewrite and do a dynamical lookup for a rewrite-map using LDAP. If you wish you may use a RDB instead of LDAP: This dynamic rewrite-map then can be used to map virtual hosts and whatever you want. The biggest problem with mod_rewrite is, that it does allow

http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/

2002-07-30 Thread Graham Leggett
Hi all, Seems the automated http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/ directory is missing httpd-ldap - can someone add it to the list? Regards, Graham -- - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon over Bourbon Street