At 06:50 AM 11/22/2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> wrowe 2002/11/21 18:08:42
>>
>> Modified:include ap_release.h
>> Log:
>> Branch tag APACHE_2_0_BRANCH now contains Apache 2.0 development.
>>
>> Persist cvs HEAD as Apache 2.1.
>>
>> After
At 09:58 AM 11/21/2002, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>>So what about for 2.0.45 dev ?
>>
>>My prediction about interest in such a switch was independent of
>>timeframe. I doubt that such a switch will ever happen.
>
>2.0.44 won't be the last 2.0 release isn't it ?
No... 2.0.45 will be compatible with 2.0.
Francis, very cool patch! I'll look at it if noone beats me to it,
you aren't the only one who wants this feature :-)
Bill
At 03:09 AM 11/21/2002, Francis Daly wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>This is a late follow-on from some posts in May.
>
>mod_autoindex in Apache/2 does not show filenames for which the
At 12:04 AM 11/21/2002, Glenn wrote:
>And now a question about the code: why bother checking for .htaccess files
>outside of valid DocumentRoots (or UserDirs)? If you need to set directives
>above the document root, create a block in httpd.conf.
Apache checks whatever you ask it to. If your con
At 07:58 PM 11/20/2002, Thom May wrote:
>This is in response to a debian bug request; basically it just tightens up
>the list of allowed characters, so we don't include .dotfiles and backups
>etc.
>Thoughts?
Yea... I'd ask for exactly what I've been asking for over a year...
...does anyone have a
+1 on committing this. I finally got around to testing it.
-Rasmus
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am submitting a patch to mod_usertrack for your consideration.
> This patch was developed here at Fast Search & Transfer for
> alltheweb.com and provides the following ch
At 03:09 PM 11/20/2002, Sander Striker wrote:
>Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>>Thom May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>So what is the consensus with the renames? The patch is available from
>>http://cvs.apache.org/~thommay/full-rename-diff and seems good - it builds
>>and passes tests on (at least) BeOS and
Hi,
I will try to draw the problem i got today with r->server->port
I am in reverse proxy with apache 2.0 (cvs last checkout)
i have UseCanonicalName Off
I am behing a INTEL SSL Accelerator which connect on my apache reverse
proxy on port 8095
but it never put in the request the port 8095
so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> wrowe 2002/11/21 18:08:42
>
> Modified:include ap_release.h
> Log:
> Branch tag APACHE_2_0_BRANCH now contains Apache 2.0 development.
>
> Persist cvs HEAD as Apache 2.1.
>
> After discussion at AC, a number of individuals including San
hiroyuki hanai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 14 Nov 2002 14:17:11 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > trawick 2002/11/14 06:17:11
> >
> > Modified:.CHANGES acinclude.m4 configure.in
> >docs/conf httpd-std.conf.in ssl-std.conf
> >server lis
On 14 Nov 2002 14:17:11 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> trawick 2002/11/14 06:17:11
>
> Modified:.CHANGES acinclude.m4 configure.in
>docs/conf httpd-std.conf.in ssl-std.conf
>server listen.c
> Log:
> Add --[enable|disable]-v4-mapped config
I also refer you to the discussion thread regarding the
original inclusion of mod_deflate which contains some
'advice' posted to the Apache forum from Dr. Mark Adler
( one of the original authors of all this GZIP/ZLIB LZ77
code ).
He suggested that compiling your OWN version of GZIP/ZLIB
was prett
André Malo wrote:
This bubbled up on some discussion with statistic freaks:
The attached patch allows the user to log the accurate filter input and
output byte count, instead of only the rounded compression ratio.
The DeflateFilterNote directive will be extended as follows:
DeflateFilterNote [t
13 matches
Mail list logo
