How can I add my plug-in between mod_dav and mod_dav_svn

2002-12-19 Thread Nitin Shukla
Hello,   I am interested in adding my plug-ins between the mod_dav module of Apache and the mod_dav_svn module of Subversion. I am particularly interested in passing the "request_rec" structure to my application from the mod_dav module before it is passed to the mod_dav_svn module of Subvers

How does Apache handle multiple users ?

2002-12-19 Thread Nitin Shukla
Hello,   How does apache handle multiple users? Does Apache create multiple instances of mod_dav for a each user or keeps only one instance of mod_dav per user.   Nitin.  

Authentication

2002-12-19 Thread Udayini
Hi,   I would like to have some information related to the working of Apache while authenticating the client.   I have studied some tutorials on Apache but could not get the clear concept.   When the request from a client comes to the Apache server in the form of webdav/http , which of the mo

Mod_ssl for Apache 2.0.39 on W2K and using Bison for apache compiling

2002-12-19 Thread EMRE KUNT (Ebi Bsk. - Sistem Prog)
Hello, I am using apache2.0.39 on Win2000 and want to install it with mod_ssl.so At the compilation step, the errors below appeared. Question 1: Do you know what the problem is? Question 2: Do you know how to use Bison on W2000 in MS Visual C 6 to compile apache? (which .h and .l files are to

How Apache authenticates against webdav requests

2002-12-19 Thread Nitin Shukla
Hello,   I am interested to find the flow control for Authentication by Apache server when it receives the WebDav Delta V requests. Assuming that the mod_dav module is up and running with the httpd 2.0, will a webdav/http request be passed on to the mod_dav module which in turn calls the "mo

Re: SSL segfault on HEAD

2002-12-19 Thread Brian Pane
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 20:46, Cliff Woolley wrote: > On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote: > > > > HEAD (as of sometime yesterday) is segfaulting on me. Stack trace below. > > > This happens on all SSL requests; others seem fine. This on Linux with > > > RedHat's openssl-0.9.6b-28. > > > > Sigh

Re: SSL segfault on HEAD

2002-12-19 Thread Scott Lamb
Cliff Woolley wrote: Sigh. Wonder if this is related to what FirstBill saw earlier today with the proxy? Seeing as nothing has changed in the buckets code any time recently... O WAIT, yes it has. Brian apparently committed a change to allocate the apr_bucket_brigade itself out of the br

Re: SSL segfault on HEAD

2002-12-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote: > > HEAD (as of sometime yesterday) is segfaulting on me. Stack trace below. > > This happens on all SSL requests; others seem fine. This on Linux with > > RedHat's openssl-0.9.6b-28. > > Sigh. Wonder if this is related to what FirstBill saw earlier today

RE: Memory leak on Windows [Bugzilla #11427]

2002-12-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Alex Varju wrote: > apr_allocator_max_free_set(), and the default behaviour is to hold on to > all memory ever allocated, and allocate memory future requests out of that That's a general problem, yes... one for which I have a patch in my local tree that I'll commit next week

Re: SSL segfault on HEAD

2002-12-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Scott Lamb wrote: > HEAD (as of sometime yesterday) is segfaulting on me. Stack trace below. > This happens on all SSL requests; others seem fine. This on Linux with > RedHat's openssl-0.9.6b-28. > > I'm wondering if this has anything to do with the ssl changes on the > 14th.

RE: Memory leak on Windows [Bugzilla #11427]

2002-12-19 Thread Alex Varju
I believe that I have made some progress on this, but I'm not confident that my solution is the correct one. There were several factors playing into this that pulled my attention away from the real issue. I originally reported that this problem was CGI specific; it turns out that this is not the

RE: [Auth_ldap] util_ldap_cache & shared memory failure

2002-12-19 Thread Bennett, Tony - CNF
Title: Message I just discovered that this is an already reported bug:     http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12757   Is anyone working on this   Thanks, -tony -Original Message-From: Bennett, Tony - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 1

SSL segfault on HEAD

2002-12-19 Thread Scott Lamb
HEAD (as of sometime yesterday) is segfaulting on me. Stack trace below. This happens on all SSL requests; others seem fine. This on Linux with RedHat's openssl-0.9.6b-28. I'm wondering if this has anything to do with the ssl changes on the 14th. They touched ssl_engine_io.c, though there's no

Re: segfault in 2.1 head

2002-12-19 Thread Paul J. Reder
Hmmm, I was just doing some proxy testing late last week and early this week with a head build as recent as 12/16 or so and wasn't seeing any problems. I might not have been hitting exactly what you were, Bill, but I was doing some ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse work with virtual hosts across two d

Re: segfault in 2.1 head

2002-12-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Bill Stoddard wrote: > Hitting a segfault running traffic through proxy gateway > (ProxyPass/ProxyPassReverse) while reading the response from the > backend. The backend page has a few dozen components. Last time I > checked, we do not have this problem in 2.0 HEAD. That *pro

RE: 2.0.44 release?

2002-12-19 Thread Bill Stoddard
I think Sander is going to spend some time on this Monday. Sander, I'll be around Monday to help out. Bill > What does everyone think about releasing 2.0.44 soon? My company kind of > needs the logio fixes but we're hesitant to run our own special patched > version of 2.0.43 when we have so mu

segfault in 2.1 head

2002-12-19 Thread Bill Stoddard
Hitting a segfault running traffic through proxy gateway (ProxyPass/ProxyPassReverse) while reading the response from the backend. The backend page has a few dozen components. Last time I checked, we do not have this problem in 2.0 HEAD. Preliminary analysis: At line 801 in proxy_http.c (in ap_pro

2.0.44 release?

2002-12-19 Thread David Burry
What does everyone think about releasing 2.0.44 soon? My company kind of needs the logio fixes but we're hesitant to run our own special patched version of 2.0.43 when we have so much riding on this project... Dave

Re: Request for comments: moving the request pool cleanup

2002-12-19 Thread Brian Pane
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 10:02, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:45 AM -0800 Brian Pane > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No, we definitely need to do that cleanup in core_output_filter, > > because that's the only code that's guaranteed to still be runnable > > by the

Re: Request for comments: moving the request pool cleanup

2002-12-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:45 AM -0800 Brian Pane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No, we definitely need to do that cleanup in core_output_filter, because that's the only code that's guaranteed to still be runnable by the time we detect the aborted connection. The handler may have finished ru

Re: Request for comments: moving the request pool cleanup

2002-12-19 Thread Brian Pane
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 09:37, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:28 AM -0800 Brian Pane > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If the connection is aborted after the metadata bucket is > > pushed into the output filter chain, it would be the core > > output filter's job to c

Re: Request for comments: moving the request pool cleanup

2002-12-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:28 AM -0800 Brian Pane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If the connection is aborted after the metadata bucket is pushed into the output filter chain, it would be the core output filter's job to consume and destroy all remaining buckets until it had processed the requ

Re: Request for comments: moving the request pool cleanup

2002-12-19 Thread Brian Pane
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 21:55, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:23 PM -0800 Brian Pane > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My proposed changes are: > > - Create each top-level request pool as a free-standing pool, > > rather than a subpool of the connection pool.

Re: excessively inclusive include?

2002-12-19 Thread Thom May
* emf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Hello, > > The apache2.conf file I have includes this line: > > Include /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/* > > When I attempt to revision control /etc/, a .svn directory is placed in > this directory. Apache then refuses to start, after attempting to read > this d

Re: excessively inclusive include?

2002-12-19 Thread Thom May
see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=161512 -Thom * emf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Hello, > > The apache2.conf file I have includes this line: > > Include /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/* > > When I attempt to revision control /etc/, a .svn directory is placed in > this directory

excessively inclusive include?

2002-12-19 Thread emf
Hello, The apache2.conf file I have includes this line: Include /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/* When I attempt to revision control /etc/, a .svn directory is placed in this directory. Apache then refuses to start, after attempting to read this directory. Is it intended behaviour to include files

Re: ltconfig, libtool, 2.0.39 vs. 2.0.43

2002-12-19 Thread Andy Cutright
hi, thanks for the input. the question still remains, is this a regression? is this something to be concerned about with other platforms? cheers, andy Jeff Trawick wrote: Andy Cutright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: hi all, i've been wrestling with linking & running 2.0.43 on

RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental cache_cache.c mod_cache.c mod_cache.h mod_mem_cache.c

2002-12-19 Thread Bill Stoddard
> > +if (sconf->max_streaming_buffer_size < > sconf->min_cache_object_size) { > > +ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_WARNING, 0, s, > > + "MCacheMaxStreamingBuffer must be less than > or equal to MCacheMaxObjectSize. " > > + "Resetting MCa

Re: ltconfig, libtool, 2.0.39 vs. 2.0.43

2002-12-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
Andy Cutright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hi all, > > i've been wrestling with linking & running 2.0.43 on AIX 5.1 for a Please see http://www.apache.org/~trawick/apache-2-on-aix.html As mentioned there and as mentioned in the README for the patches directory for 2.0.43, on AIX (as well as