At 08:24 PM 1/17/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>wrowe 2003/01/17 18:24:46
>
> Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH Makefile.win
> Log:
>Damned... this was broken but, since most of us build from .dsp files,
>it was never noted. I intend to package this patch into the Win32
* Stas Bekman wrote:
> What I was missing is the error message attached to the end of the normal
> output to indicate that there was a problem (better late than never).
>
> e.g. the following script:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
> print "Content-type: text/plain\n\n";
> print "Should be printed";
> pr
Hello,
I have a connection filter of type AP_FTYPE_NETWORK which gets called
just before the core output filter. I have placed it here to get at
(read only) the raw output of the server for a given request. The
problem that I am facing is that when my filter callback gets called,
there is no re
André Malo wrote:
* Stas Bekman wrote:
It shows that I haven't run mod_cgi for ages. I was just used to having
this as a failure (500) under mod_perl. Any reason for not checking the
return status?
hmm, performance? memory usage? What about a script that throws out a lot
of data (say, 1 MB
manaay wrote:
I am also getting this error. Do you know how to solve the problem?
You don't tell which OS you are on. On linux 'ipcs' lists the semaphores
and shared mem segments. which you can delete with 'ipcrm', e.g.
% ipcs
-- Semaphore Arrays
keysemid owner
* Stas Bekman wrote:
> It shows that I haven't run mod_cgi for ages. I was just used to having
> this as a failure (500) under mod_perl. Any reason for not checking the
> return status?
hmm, performance? memory usage? What about a script that throws out a lot
of data (say, 1 MB, multiplied with
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:32:51PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please cast your votes accordingly.
>
>
> I did the roll with libtool 1.4.2. If this is a problem,
> let me know, I'll up
* Sander Striker wrote:
> I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please cast your votes accordingly.
Didn't test it at the moment, but I guess, the CHANGES file should not
contain 2.0.45 changes... ;-)
nd
--
If God intended people to
I am also getting this error. Do you know how to solve the problem?
thanks,
Miha
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > After starting the server for many times I've received:
> >
> > [Tue Jan 14 15:55:36 2003] [emerg] (
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Friday, January 17, 2003 4:36 PM +1100 Stas Bekman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Consider this mod_cgi script:
# !/usr/bin/perl -w
print "Content-type: text/plain\n\n";
print no_such_func();
print "Shouldn't be printed";
httpd.conf:
ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ "/home/httpd
Sander Striker wrote:
I just tagged STRIKER_2_0_44_PRE3. I think this is going to be
our .44. It would be nice to give it one more day on daedalus
and get some +1s on it.
+1 for release as 2.0.44, and thanks for your efforts.
Greg
Hi,
I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please cast your votes accordingly.
I did the roll with libtool 1.4.2. If this is a problem,
let me know, I'll upgrade my libtool to 1.4.3 and re-roll
ASAP.
Thanks,
Sander
> From: Dmitri Tikhonov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:53 PM
> Tagged "Januari 17?" :-)
*sigh*
Yeah, that's how you spell it in The Netherlands.
Fix comming up, although I might aswell roll it first...
Sander
Tagged "Januari 17?" :-)
- Dmitri.
On 17 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> striker 2003/01/17 11:07:31
>
> Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH STATUS
>include Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH ap_release.h
> Log:
> Bump after the tag.
>
> Revision Changes
Sander Striker wrote:
>From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:11 PM
>you definitely da bomb!
Good or bad? ;)
I meant it as a compliment, of course!
(everything I know I learned from my 11-year-old daughter,
so beware)
> From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 8:11 PM
> you definitely da bomb!
Good or bad? ;)
Sander
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> striker 2003/01/17 11:04:37
>>
>> Modified:include Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH ap_release.h
>> Log:
>> Bump for t
you definitely da bomb!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
striker 2003/01/17 11:04:37
Modified:include Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH ap_release.h
Log:
Bump for the tag.
Hi,
I read the discussion for few messages, i am not an apache developper,
so i will speak as a user. IMHO, Splitting into two modules will make
auth more complex. actually, it's not really easy to setup, and the
documentation is not always up to date.
regards
Matthieu
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Is it possible to run Apache on a named port such as http://www.moo.org:cow
with TCPMUX?
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Hi,
is it possible that we can get also snapshots of apr-iconv at:
http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/
??
and in addition it would be fine if we could have both the stable and the dev tree as
snapshots;
currently since teh trees where splitted there's only a snapshot of the 2.1 dev tree...
Guenter.
+1
At 9:42 AM -0500 1/16/03, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>I can certainly understand that :) Here is a new patch along those lines.
>
>Index: main/http_main.c
>===
>RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/main/http_main.c,v
>retrieving revision
Graham Leggett wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
No, you don't *have* to split them into different modules. One
module could register for both authn/authz providers. The only
reason we split was because their wasn't a lot of shared code between
the other auth modules. I think mod_auth_ldap
Hi all,
while someone has take care that the main directory at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/
displays all filenames complete, there are almost all longer filenames of the binaries
truncated; f.e.:
http://nagoya.apache.org/mirror/httpd/binaries/linux/
http://nagoya.apache.org/mirror/httpd/bina
That is correct behaviour to send a 200 since the HTTP headers are complete.
It's always been this way.
I am working on a modification to mod_cgi so a module can register a special
output_and_stderr filter, parse stderr, and can send a 500 if it deems necessary.
> -Original Message-
> Fr
+1 for splitting auth_ldap into authz/authn. We will be releasing our
mod_edir module that provides an alternative authorization service for
auth_ldap. It relies on mod_auth_ldap for authentication and then
enforces access control through mod_edir. It it currently implemented
by adding an "edir-u
> All (or most) of the shared code is in mod_ldap already. It should be
> relatively easy to split mod_auth_ldap into mod_authn_ldap and
> mod_authz_ldap.
Perhaps we need to go into the terminilogy that modules which have no
handlers (except init, etc) or no directives are called something like
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
No, you don't *have* to split them into different modules. One module
could register for both authn/authz providers. The only reason we split
was because their wasn't a lot of shared code between the other auth
modules. I think mod_auth_ldap has a lot of shared code
--On Friday, January 17, 2003 4:36 PM +1100 Stas Bekman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Consider this mod_cgi script:
# !/usr/bin/perl -w
print "Content-type: text/plain\n\n";
print no_such_func();
print "Shouldn't be printed";
httpd.conf:
ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ "/home/httpd/2.0/perl/"
The error is
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:36:58PM +1100, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Consider this mod_cgi script:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
> print "Content-type: text/plain\n\n";
> print no_such_func();
> print "Shouldn't be printed";
>
> httpd.conf:
> ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ "/home/httpd/2.0/perl/"
>
> The error is cor
--On Friday, January 17, 2003 9:59 AM +0200 Graham Leggett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I were to change mod_auth_ldap to use the new authz/authn system
in v2.1, I have to split mod_auth_ldap into mod_authn_ldap (the
is-password-correct part) and mod_authz_ldap (group-membership
part). Am I corr
30 matches
Mail list logo
