On Saturday, January 25, 2003, at 11:52 PM, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
Just another thing comes to mind. How about CVS access??
I beleibe if people are willing to work on this a seperate CVS
repository would allow quicker people to develop on it.
People working on the pop module, do not neccessarl
On Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 05:59 AM, Martin Kutschker wrote:
SASL is such a plugable authentication. Though it fails to be easily
extendable. Perhaps an ASF xp implementation of the RFC is of > interest.
We'd be happy to entertain proposals. :)
-aaron
On Saturday, January 25, 2003, at 02:41 PM, Erik Abele wrote:
Perhaps there is not much interest because it is somewhat 'hidden'?
IMHO mod_pop3 would gain more visibility and therefore perhaps a
better community when folded into httpd. Imagine windoze users: they
mostly rely on binary distrib
On Saturday, January 25, 2003, at 12:43 PM, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
3)Why for instance, could this not stay as a seperate module??
I don't think we should be moving more code into the core.
It would be nice if we could make the core lean and mean
and keep the modules on their own independent
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 08:31:14AM +0100, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
>
> On Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 12:18 AM, Erik Abele wrote:
> >Well, than let's move it in. A quick overview of the last mails shows
> >the following votes:
> >
> >justin +0 modules/pop3
> >jim +1 modules/experimental
> >bills
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Daniel Lopez wrote:
>
> So, when I volunteered to integrate mod_pop3 I thought I would have to
> do some modifications to the code to bring it up to date, but that is
> not the case. I tested it over the weekend both in Apache 2.0 and Apache
> 2.1 and compiles and works just f
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Daniel Lopez wrote:
> I followed the examples that exist for other modules, but I do not have a
> setup for converting it to html, so somebody in the docs projects should
> have a look at it to check I did not screw up. In particular, some
> of the references to mod_auth may n
So, when I volunteered to integrate mod_pop3 I thought I would have to do
some modifications to the code to bring it up to date, but that is not the
case.
I tested it over the weekend both in Apache 2.0 and Apache 2.1 and
compiles and works just fine.
If people decide to include it in experimental
actually this bug happened over 5 years ago ...
However, try a standard installation and put a single "Satisfy Any" into
the DocumentRoot's Directory section. If you then try to access
http://localhost: in 1.3 you'll get a weird 500 without an errorlog
message. In 2.x you'll loose all MIME and
Hi Bill,
thanks for further details.
My question came up while I'm in contact with a module author and we are trying to get
the fresh ported 2.0 modules up on Netware and Win32. I found apr_file_inherit_set()
in the headers and suggested using this instead of chown() in the hope that APR will
d
Hi all!
For some reasons I had to put the structure "request_rec" into a class like:
RequestHandler
{
private:
struct request_rec *r;
public:
print(const char *data)
{
ap_rprintf(r,"%s",data);
}
}
If I use this class for sending data (250 KB) to a browser (IE 5.0), the
browser will
At 11:02 AM 1/26/2003, Thom May wrote:
>* Günter Knauf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>> > * Guenter Knauf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>> >> Hi,
>> >> I can see that mod_log_config, mod_rewrite and mod_file_cache have it in;
>> >> but where in the source tree is APR_INHERIT as set by
>> >> apr_file_in
--On Sunday, January 26, 2003 5:55 PM +0100 Günter Knauf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
is there an API for getting the MPM which is in use??
Not the specific MPM per se, but if you look in ap_mpm.h, you'll see
that you can query the properties of the running MPM. -- justin
Martin Kutschker wrote:
>
>
> > Also by adding a module like this,
> > the complete group should also think of making Apache
> > somehow a bit more 'different protocol friendly'. I understand
> > this is already a topic of the past (2 years ago), but
> > now it becomes valid request to ask, IMHO.
* Günter Knauf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > * Guenter Knauf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> >> Hi,
> >> I can see that mod_log_config, mod_rewrite and mod_file_cache have it in;
> >> but where in the source tree is APR_INHERIT as set by
> >> apr_file_inherit_set() actually handled?
> >> A grep of
--On Sunday, January 26, 2003 5:48 PM +0100 Günter Knauf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
see apr_arch_inherit.h in include/arch/*/
Thats a useless answer. I want to see a .c that implements whats
defined in a .h.
No, it's not useless. I'd suggest actually reading the files Thom
pointed you at.
Hi,
is there an API for getting the MPM which is in use??
Guenter.
> * Guenter Knauf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>> Hi,
>> I can see that mod_log_config, mod_rewrite and mod_file_cache have it in;
>> but where in the source tree is APR_INHERIT as set by
>> apr_file_inherit_set() actually handled?
>> A grep of the source tree does not find any application of this f
Sander,
On Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 05:16 PM, Sander Striker wrote:
Somehow it could be, since you can reuse parts of Apache and APR
for instance. But then one does not need to use Apache to make a POP
server while still using APR. Simply download APR and use it as a
library.
*Buzzz* What
> From: Harrie Hazewinkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 5:00 PM
[...]
>>> Also by adding a module like this,
>>> the complete group should also think of making Apache
>>> somehow a bit more 'different protocol friendly'. I understand
>>> this is already a topic of the
HI,
On Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 02:59 PM, Martin Kutschker wrote:
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 21:43:41 +0100
From: Harrie Hazewinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Ben Hyde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1) [snip] I believe it would be better to
add first a good message store API in such a way that different
typ
Did you do "cvs update" without doing "make extraclean"?
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
gawk: /usr/src/httpd-2.0/build/make_exports.awk:138:
(FILENAME=/usr/src/httpd-2.0/include/pcreposix.h FNR=99) fatal: cannot
open file `/usr/src/httpd-2.0/include/rfc1413.h' for reading (No such file
or directory)
HI all,
always the same problem.
I have to work with the content generated from the
server.
I cannot get it,even if in the API I have BUFF *client
in the conn_rec is used internally to read and write
data to the client.
I dont know how to get the content, any ideas? Can I
interact with the BUFF *cl
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 21:43:41 +0100
From: Harrie Hazewinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Ben Hyde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 1) [snip] I believe it would be better to
> add first a good message store API in such a way that different
> types of mailboxes and databases can be used. The protocol
> module sho
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Thom May wrote:
> I think this covers most of the points...
We're getting more and more paniced people coming on IRC and asking
about TRACE, what they should do about it, and why there isn't a
flashing red sign about it on the apache.org front page. It was my
understanding,
gawk: /usr/src/httpd-2.0/build/make_exports.awk:138:
(FILENAME=/usr/src/httpd-2.0/include/pcreposix.h FNR=99) fatal: cannot
open file `/usr/src/httpd-2.0/include/rfc1413.h' for reading (No such file
or directory)
make[2]: *** [/usr/src/httpd-2.0/server/exports.c] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 11:53 PM
> Erik Abele wrote:
>> Perhaps there is not much interest because it is somewhat 'hidden'? IMHO mod_pop3
>would gain more visibility and
>> therefore perhaps a better community when folded into httpd. Im
> From: Harrie Hazewinkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 8:52 AM
> Just another thing comes to mind. How about CVS access??
> I beleibe if people are willing to work on this a seperate CVS
> repository would allow quicker people to develop on it.
> People working on th
28 matches
Mail list logo
