Try looking at the subversion code. It uses APXS and has a fairly
intelligent set of macros to do it. It also looks for and uses
apr-config and apu-config. It's pretty cool.
http://subversion.tigris.org/project_source.html
Good luck. I can also send you the appropriate m4 files if you are
First of all, I'll take any and all pointers to documentation on this.
Second, I am trying to setup
autoconf/automake/CVS build environment
in my configure.ac
dnl Compile time options
AC_ARG_WITH(
apxs,
[AC_HELP_STRING([--with-apxs path to apxs binary])],
* Erik Abele wrote:
> I've fixed that in cvs:/site-tools/httpd-docs/APIdict.pm
cool catch. Thanks!
> we'll need somebody else to fix this :)
yep. Somebody out there? ;-)
nd
--
> [...] weiß jemand zufällig, was der Tag DIV ausgeschrieben bedeutet?
DIVerses. Benannt nach all dem unstrukturierte
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Chris Monson wrote:
Done. Where shall I submit the patch? Is it kosher to send it to this
list?
Absolutely.
(Well, sometimes if the patch is really really big, we have people post it
to a webpage somewhere and just mail the URL to the list, but
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Chris Monson wrote:
> Done. Where shall I submit the patch? Is it kosher to send it to this
> list?
Absolutely.
(Well, sometimes if the patch is really really big, we have people post it
to a webpage somewhere and just mail the URL to the list, but most of the
time just go
By the way, thanks for taking this on!! This was a missing bit of
reality check in the current support for IPv6. The usual two round
drips to the DNS really sucks.
Done. Where shall I submit the patch? Is it kosher to send it to this
list?
C
André Malo wrote:
* André Malo wrote:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8889
All the links inside of the text are causing 404s (missing apidoc_ prefix
and .html suffix). Where is that stuff stored and generated? Although it's
1.3 we should keep it clean :)
hmm. It seems, I'm not t
* Jeff Trawick wrote:
> if it changes code from prior release and it is user visible, log it;
> otherwise, probably not if you ask me unless it is something really big
> like making mod_rewrite easier to read :)
hehehe ;-) Actually a lot of things in mod_rewrite can be simplified and
implemented
Also, you should take a look at this thread in the archives starting
last September -- "IPv6 capability and name lookup cost" -- to see if
somebody brought up some useful points that I can't remember at the
present time.
I read the thread. I am beginning the implementation using IPLookups as
Chris Monson wrote:
Sounds good. I am a teeny bit new to the Apache 2.0 sources, so I was
wondering if you would point me at the appropriate file to add a
per-server (global) config parameter to. I'll hunt for it on my own,
but some help may expedite the process.
Look at this array
static const
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Chris Monson wrote:
I have noticed that mod_proxy, in its apr_sockaddr_info_get calls uses
unspecified resolution and sends it no flags. This, of course, allows
the APR to make the decision as to how to resolve the hostname, but it
causes some truly amazing slowdowns when AAA
EMRE KUNT (Ebi Bsk. - Sistem Prog) wrote:
When i type the address and if an index page is not there, all directory
content can be seen. How to deny this?
See doc for mod_autoindex
(http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_autoindex.html) and the Options
(http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core.html#o
Hello,
Using apache 1 3 27.
When i type the address and if an index page is not there, all directory
content can be seen. How to deny this?
Thanks and regards,
Emre Kunt
Has there been any further discussion of this?
Anthony Howe
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 06:14 AM 2/5/2003, Anthony Howe wrote:
Please find enclosed a proposed solution for the bug I posted
last month:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16056
The source code comments in the pat
* Cliff Woolley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Trevor Hurst wrote:
>
> > > Anyone in users have this problem, or should I say
> > > how mny out there have successfully compiled apache2.0.44
> > > with ldap and auth-ldap support?
> > >
> > > Did anyone have the same problem I'm
15 matches
Mail list logo
