RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c request.c

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 3:25 AM > striker 2003/06/30 18:25:07 > > Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH CHANGES STATUS >include Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH http_core.h >modules/http Tag: APACHE_2_0

LimitInternalRecursion for 1.3

Call for votes ;-) There's a patch residing in the 2.0 STATUS file (for some reason), which manages infinite loops of internal redirects and subrequests. It's already acked for 2.0 includsion and it would be nice, if someone could review the 1.3 patch (

Re: ap_max_requests_per_child isn't part of the API, is it?

On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:25:55AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Saturday, June 28, 2003 8:24 AM -0400 Jeff Trawick > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Can anybody agree that something like this is is part of the formal > >definition of our API? >... > > +1. -- justin +1 here, also. Al

Release date for Apache 2.1 or 2.2

Hi, is there any plan to release Apache 2.1 or 2.2 in the near future or is there a kind of roadmap or something? Bye and thanks, Werner.

RE: AddHandler scope

> > I've been working on a module and quite unexpectedly I found that my > > AddHandler directive was taking affect at a global level even > though it was > > defined within a virtual host block. So it was affecting Apache manual > > pages that weren't in the virtual host for which I had created t

Re: AddHandler scope

--On Sunday, June 29, 2003 2:05 PM -0700 "Marc M. Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've been working on a module and quite unexpectedly I found that my AddHandler directive was taking affect at a global level even though it was defined within a virtual host block. So it was affecting Apache ma

Re: ap_max_requests_per_child isn't part of the API, is it?

--On Saturday, June 28, 2003 8:24 AM -0400 Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can anybody agree that something like this is is part of the formal definition of our API? "Apache header files contain declarations for a number of variables and functions. Many of these are part of the API, whil

RE: ap_max_requests_per_child isn't part of the API, is it?

--On Sunday, June 29, 2003 1:03 PM -0700 "Marc M. Adkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A FAQ Wiki might be useful. Then we could copy chunks of emails into the wiki and later reference the wiki pages by URL. This would be a temporary collecting point for the data pending formal documentation, and

RE: apache 2.0.46 : segmentation fault or hangs system

Hi Peter, When you do a tusc, do you see the process looping on 'sendfile' ?. If 'yes', I believe it's a transport layer bug (and we need some system information), and I've been trying to duplicate it for the last couple of months, without any success. It'll be nice if I can get access to t

RE: Apache 1.3.x - Problem with handling ErrorDocument for 413 ?

Thanks for the consideration. I'll look forward for your feedback. -Madhu -Original Message- From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 6:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache 1.3.x - Problem with handling ErrorDocument for 413 ? On Monday, June

apache 2.0.46 : segmentation fault or hangs system

Hi, a couple of weeks ago I upgraded our servers from 2.0.43 to 2.0.46. Since then, child processes on our internal server either exit with a segmentation fault or keep running but take all CPU power. Hanging processes occur at a rate of about 5 per hour. As far as I can see the URLs they are