Re: Apache warning: Connection refused: connect to listener

2003-09-29 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Alex Hart wrote: > I just installed Apache/2.0.47 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.47 OpenSSL/0.9.7b in > my server (freebsd 4.8) and everything seems to be working fine. I have > apache configured to serve both secure and insecure pages. > > However, I keep getting the following line in my

how to log what status was returned by a cgi script

2003-09-29 Thread Jeff Trawick
a cgi script can write this in the response header: "Status: nnn"... it would sometimes be nice to know if the script did such a thing... (like a current problem I'm working on: where the heck did the 500 come from for this CGI; there's nothing in the error log and the few places in the server

RE: Bug report for Apache httpd-2.0 [2003/09/28]

2003-09-29 Thread MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Is this a bug or what ?. Why do we have SAX/DOM/XML related bugs being sent out the [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?. -Madhu >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 7:22 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Bug report for Apache httpd-2.0

Re: Tagged 2.1

2003-09-29 Thread André Malo
* The Doctor wrote: > BIG -1 on BSD/OS!! Failed on mod_ruby and mod_perl . That may or may not be an apache mistake. Perhaps these modules are not ready for apr 1.0? nd

Re: Tagged 2.0

2003-09-29 Thread The Doctor
+1 on BSD/OS!! On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:19:07AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: > -1 on NetWare. With the new call to apr_atomic_init() that was added to > apr_pool.c, apr_pool.c must now #include apr_atomic.h in order to pick > up the NETWARE macro for apr_atomic_init. Without it, it doesn't > co

Re: Tagged 2.1

2003-09-29 Thread The Doctor
BIG -1 on BSD/OS!! Failed on mod_ruby and mod_perl . On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:02:29AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: > -1 on NetWare. The latest round of atomic changes killed us. APR no > longer compiles. I will be committing the NETWARE changes in > apr_atomic.h soon. > > Brad > > Brad Ni

RE: Tagged 2.0

2003-09-29 Thread Brad Nicholes
-1 on NetWare. With the new call to apr_atomic_init() that was added to apr_pool.c, apr_pool.c must now #include apr_atomic.h in order to pick up the NETWARE macro for apr_atomic_init. Without it, it doesn't compile. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider

Re: Tagged 2.1

2003-09-29 Thread Brad Nicholes
-1 on NetWare. The latest round of atomic changes killed us. APR no longer compiles. I will be committing the NETWARE changes in apr_atomic.h soon. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com >>> [EMAIL PROTEC