Are you willing to break upgrades for people who currently use fall-back
virtual hosts in combination with a forward proxy?
Are there any people doing this? By that I mean combining the services
of Apache both as a webserver and as a forward proxy at the same time?
(I'm not a proxy
Are you willing to break upgrades for people who currently use
fall-back
virtual hosts in combination with a forward proxy?
Are there any people doing this? By that I mean combining the services
of Apache both as a webserver and as a forward proxy at the same time?
(I'm not a proxy
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
It is well known to developers that sendfile() will fail under various
circumstances, often involving non-standard filesystems like nfs or smb.
Unfortunately, this is not well-known to users. I've added it to the FAQ:
mod_rewrite and and mod_cgid need to know when Apache restarts itself, so they
won't perform the same thing more than once. Other modules need this
functionality as well (Glen suggested macros to do that). Instead of copying
the hack around and having each module stash its data into the main
I would be interested to know - is there anyone running an instance of
Apache that does _both_ forward proxy (Proxyrequest on) and serving
sites at the same time?
Yes - both those and reverse-proxy. Is there supposed to be anything
problematic about that?
(the forward-proxy is very low
hi all
when I do a fresh checkout of apache-1.3
$ cvs -z9 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic checkout
apache-1.3
I see this error
cvs server: existing repository /home/cvspublic/apache-1.3/htdocs does not
match /home/cvspublic/httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs
and htdocs is free of content.
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Geoffrey Young wrote:
when I do a fresh checkout of apache-1.3
$ cvs -z9 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic checkout
apache-1.3
I just ran this exact same command and it succeeded... was it really a
fresh checkout (ie, rm -rf apache-1.3 and then check out)?
