Joshua Slive wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:
What must be done to the bug tracker we have now to track the patches better?
(I'm not against having something better, but I don't want to see a delay in
waiting for some magic tool.)
We can already assign the keyword "PatchAvailable"
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> What must be done to the bug tracker we have now to track the patches better?
>
> (I'm not against having something better, but I don't want to see a delay in
> waiting for some magic tool.)
>
> We can already assign the keyword "PatchAvailable" for entri
Igor Kovalenko wrote:
I am just lurking here really... but a while back I did try to post some
patches dealing with QNX support to both Apache and PHP. In my humble
opinion, there was a world of difference in attitude that I have encountered
in those two projects.
The attitude of PHP folks was 'yo
At 02:34 PM 11/18/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
>Peter J. Cranstone wrote:
>
>If I am not mistaken, I seem to recall that TransmitFile() is artifically limited to
>serving no more than 10 TCP connections on non server editions of Windows. I've not
>actually tried it myself.
Not TCP connections.
Th
ranier wrote:
--- sdbm-old.c 2003-07-08 19:55:04.0 -0300
+++ sdbm.c 2003-07-08 19:57:52.0 -0300
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@
while (dbit < db->maxbno && getdbit(db, dbit))
dbit = 2 * dbit + ((hash & (1 << hbit++)) ? 2 : 1);
-debug(("dbit: %d...", dbit));
+debug(("dbit: %
Jeff White wrote:
From: "Bill Stoddard"
Andrew Mann wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/5726.asp
"Also, because TransmitFile is geared toward server applications,
it is
fully functional only on server versions of Windows. On home and
professional versions, t
Aaron Bannert wrote:
This seems to work fine on my Mac OS X (10.3 Panther) box, my linux
2.4 x86 box, and my linux x86_64 (amd64 opteron) box. Let me know
if there are any problems (and fixes) so I can encorporate the fixes
and reroll in a few days. My goal is to churn out updated -rc tarballs
eve
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Server version: Apache/2.1.0-dev
Server built: Aug 12 2003 02:25:22
Server's Module Magic Number: 20030213:1
Architecture: 32-bit
Server MPM: Prefork
too bad ap_show_mpm doesn't list this like other modules :( ("prefork.c" or
"worker.c")... the major source file name
Andre Schild wrote:
what would be the "best" way to log all error 500 (all status 50x responses
in fact) into a separate logfile ?
One way could be a piped log, but depending of the format
the user has configured the output can be very different.
use piped log and tell your users to put the stat
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I've just spent the past little while searching Google for anything that
might shed some light on this, and am drawing a blank ... from what I can
tell, it isn't a configuration issue (unless I'm missing a configuration
setting), but I don't know how to debug it from the se
André Malo wrote:
* Ben Collins-Sussman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW: in the Subversion project, we've assigned the hat of "patch
manager" to a volunteer in the community. He watches patches come in.
If any patch goes unanswered for a week or more, the patch manager files
it in the issuetr
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The Enums look great, can we extend apr_query_mpm instead though?
One hurdle for doing that which affects applications is that query-mpm can only
return a scalar value, so either an enum with all the granular states in it is
needed or multiple query calls must be used
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:49:55PM +0100, David Herrero wrote:
> I have to do a module that open a socket and modify a global
> variable, while the web server is runing. Is there a module that opens a
> socket and creates a child process ? In this way i see how do it,
> because i don't have a
From: "Bill Stoddard"
> Andrew Mann wrote:
>
> > http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/5726.asp
> >
> > "Also, because TransmitFile is geared toward server applications,
it is
> > fully functional only on server versions of Windows. On home and
> > professional versions, there may be o
From: "Bill Stoddard"
> Peter J. Cranstone wrote:
>
> > Bill,
> >
> > Here is an interesting link to a problem someone encountered
running Apache
> > on Windows. If he's right there is little hope for Apache to ever
run
> > properly on newer versions of Windows.
> >
> >
http://grumet.net/weblog/a
I have to do a module that open a socket and modify a global
variable, while the web server is runing. Is there a module that opens a
socket and creates a child process ? In this way i see how do it,
because i don't have any idea.
Thanks
Jess Holle wrote:
In other words, you can choose free, open-source software applications
[client or server], but if you want a Microsoft server then you still
have to pay for a Microsoft server OS.
This makes some sense -- all the more reason for the cost sensitive
(among others) to use somethi
Andrew Mann wrote:
http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/5726.asp
"Also, because TransmitFile is geared toward server applications, it is
fully functional only on server versions of Windows. On home and
professional versions, there may be only two outstanding TransmitFile
(or Transmi
In other words, you can choose free, open-source software applications
[client or server], but if you want a Microsoft server then you still
have to pay for a Microsoft server OS.
This makes some sense -- all the more reason for the cost sensitive
(among others) to use something else.
--
Jess
http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/5726.asp
"Also, because TransmitFile is geared toward server applications, it is
fully functional only on server versions of Windows. On home and
professional versions, there may be only two outstanding TransmitFile
(or TransmitPackets) calls at a
Peter J. Cranstone wrote:
Bill,
Here is an interesting link to a problem someone encountered running Apache
on Windows. If he's right there is little hope for Apache to ever run
properly on newer versions of Windows.
http://grumet.net/weblog/archives/2003/11/18/questions_about_windows_apache.
htm
Bill,
Here is an interesting link to a problem someone encountered running Apache
on Windows. If he's right there is little hope for Apache to ever run
properly on newer versions of Windows.
http://grumet.net/weblog/archives/2003/11/18/questions_about_windows_apache.
html
Regards,
Peter
Brian Akins wrote:
Matthieu Estrade wrote:
mod_cache is not caching / because of negotiate problem, if i remember
well.
We discuss many times to why not caching, and never find really a good
reason to not cache /.
I see this in mod_cache.c
/* DECLINE urls ending in / ??? EGP: why? */
if (u
Matthieu Estrade wrote:
mod_cache is not caching / because of negotiate problem, if i remember
well.
We discuss many times to why not caching, and never find really a good
reason to not cache /.
I see this in mod_cache.c
/* DECLINE urls ending in / ??? EGP: why? */
if (url[urllen-1] == '/')
mod_cache is not caching / because of negotiate problem, if i remember
well.
We discuss many times to why not caching, and never find really a good
reason to not cache /.
Brian Akins wrote:
mod_cache never caches anything ending in / (ie, www.cnn.com/) but
will cache /index.html.
Is this on p
mod_cache never caches anything ending in / (ie, www.cnn.com/) but will
cache /index.html.
Is this on purpose???
Snippets from config:
LoadModule include_module modules/mod_include.so
LoadModule cache_module modules/mod_cache.so
LoadModule mem_cache_module modules/mod_mem_cach
26 matches
Mail list logo
