[STATUS] (flood) Wed Nov 19 23:45:53 EST 2003

2003-11-20 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
flood STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2003/07/01 20:55:12 $] Release: 1.0: Released July 23, 2002 milestone-03: Tagged January 16, 2002 ASF-transfer: Released July 17, 2001 milestone-02: Tagged August 13,

[STATUS] (perl-framework) Wed Nov 19 23:45:58 EST 2003

2003-11-20 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
httpd-test/perl-framework STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2002/03/09 05:22:48 $] Stuff to do: * finish the t/TEST exit code issue (ORed with 0x2C if framework failed) * change existing tests that frob the DocumentRoot (e.g.,

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/generators mod_autoindex.c

2003-11-20 Thread Andr Malo
* Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:18:55 +0100, André Malo wrote * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mod_autoindex: new directive IndexStyleSheet Hmm, why not new IndexOption? Isn't that what Indexoptions are for? You mean somthing like: IndexOpion

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/generators mod_autoindex.c

2003-11-20 Thread Ian Holsman
André Malo wrote: * Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:18:55 +0100, André Malo wrote * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mod_autoindex: new directive IndexStyleSheet Hmm, why not new IndexOption? Isn't that what Indexoptions are for? You mean somthing like: IndexOpion

Re[2]: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/generators mod_autoindex.c

2003-11-20 Thread Astrid Keler
André Malo wrote: * Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:18:55 +0100, André Malo wrote * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mod_autoindex: new directive IndexStyleSheet Hmm, why not new IndexOption? Isn't that what Indexoptions are for? You mean somthing like: IndexOpion

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/generators mod_autoindex.c

2003-11-20 Thread Andr Malo
* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NOOO ;-) rofl seriously this option is too overloaded as it is. Let's try to leave boolean flags in IndexOptions, but create new directive names if they are non-trival choices. IndexOptions CSS=/foo/bar.css Hmm. What about *width,

2.0.48 build on MacOS X 10.3 ?

2003-11-20 Thread Henri Gomez
Did someone succeed to build 2.0.48 on MacOS X 10.3 (Jaguar) ? I does : ./configure make ... /Users/hgo/httpd-2.0.48/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -g -O2-DDARWIN -DSIGPROCMASK_SETS_THREAD_MASK -no-cpp-precomp -DAP_HAVE_DESIGNATED_INITIALIZER

SUBMITTING PATCHES

2003-11-20 Thread Jeff Trawick
Folks with outstanding patches or new patches in the works: Please follow the guidelines at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/patches.html The biggest change is that we ask people to submit patches via the bug database. Some people have been doing this already, but many patches were posted only to

Re: 2.0.48 build on MacOS X 10.3 ?

2003-11-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
Henri Gomez wrote: /Users/hgo/httpd-2.0.48/srclib/pcre/libpcre.la /Users/hgo/httpd-2.0.48/srclib/apr-util/libaprutil-0.la /Users/hgo/httpd-2.0.48/srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/lib/libexpat.la -liconv /Users/hgo/httpd-2.0.48/srclib/apr/libapr-0.la -lresolv ld: warning multiple definitions of

Re: 2.0.48 build on MacOS X 10.3 ?

2003-11-20 Thread Henri Gomez
Jim Jagielski a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: /Users/hgo/httpd-2.0.48/srclib/pcre/libpcre.la /Users/hgo/httpd-2.0.48/srclib/apr-util/libaprutil-0.la /Users/hgo/httpd-2.0.48/srclib/apr-util/xml/expat/lib/libexpat.la -liconv /Users/hgo/httpd-2.0.48/srclib/apr/libapr-0.la -lresolv ld: warning

Re: 2.0.48 build on MacOS X 10.3 ?

2003-11-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
Henri Gomez wrote: These are (should be) non-fatal... What gcc are you using ('gcc_select')? stock gcc 3.3 which came with devtools Did you confirm that 'httpd' isn't, in fact, created? -- === Jim

Re: 2.0.48 build on MacOS X 10.3 ?

2003-11-20 Thread Henri Gomez
Jim Jagielski a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: These are (should be) non-fatal... What gcc are you using ('gcc_select')? stock gcc 3.3 which came with devtools Did you confirm that 'httpd' isn't, in fact, created? No it's created and installed in /usr/local/apache2, but wonder about this error

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Nov 19 23:45:14 EST 2003

2003-11-20 Thread Brian Akins
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: * Replace some of the mutex locking in the worker MPM with atomic operations for higher concurrency. server/mpm/worker/fdqueue.c 1.24, 1.25 +1: brianp Is anyone working on this right now? If not, this is of some interest to me. -- Brian Akins

Re: 2.0.48 build on MacOS X 10.3 ?

2003-11-20 Thread Henri Gomez
Jim Jagielski a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: These are (should be) non-fatal... What gcc are you using ('gcc_select')? stock gcc 3.3 which came with devtools Did you confirm that 'httpd' isn't, in fact, created? What's the 'recommanded' configure options for OS/X ? Thanks

Re: Bug in mod_cache?

2003-11-20 Thread Bill Stoddard
Bill Stoddard wrote: Brian Akins wrote: Matthieu Estrade wrote: mod_cache is not caching / because of negotiate problem, if i remember well. We discuss many times to why not caching, and never find really a good reason to not cache /. I see this in mod_cache.c /* DECLINE urls ending in /

[PATCH] NO_USE_SIGACTION - no use undecorated names

2003-11-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
We need to axe or decorate the symbol NO_USE_SIGACTION in our ongoing effort to prevent namespace clashes. However, this turned out to be a nontrival problem. It doesn't appear that this option was ever a tunable APR option. We do have a flag APR_HAVE_SIGACTION which is tested and configured

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/winnt child.c mpm.h

2003-11-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stoddard2003/11/20 11:44:19 Modified:.CHANGES server/mpm/winnt child.c mpm.h Log: Win32: Make Win32 MPM transaction pools honor MaxMemFree There's a very small doc change needed here too. (Just add

[PATCH] 1.3: Add %X as alias for %c in LogFormat

2003-11-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
This has been itching me for awhile... I don't like loosing %c whenever mod_ssl is in the mix. This is basically a feature (yes, I said it, a feature) from 2.0 that makes sense in 1.3. The other logable items would be nice as well (%C) but this is core, I think. The other cruft is simply to put

Re: [PATCH] 1.3: Add %X as alias for %c in LogFormat

2003-11-20 Thread Jeff Trawick
Jim Jagielski wrote: This has been itching me for awhile... I don't like loosing %c whenever mod_ssl is in the mix. This is basically a feature (yes, I said it, a feature) You may be on shaky ground there, Jim. At the hackathon, I suggested an interesting feature for 1.3 to one of those

Re: [PATCH] 1.3: Add %X as alias for %c in LogFormat

2003-11-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
Jeff Trawick wrote: You may be on shaky ground there, Jim. At the hackathon, I suggested an interesting feature for 1.3 to one of those disenfranchised 1.3 developers* and was asked Why do you want to mess with 1.3? :) From our discussion, he clearly was ready for 1.3 to fade away as

Re: [PATCH] 1.3: Add %X as alias for %c in LogFormat

2003-11-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
+1 for 1.3 - we made this change already for 2.0 when we encountered the problem (as we ship mod_ssl in 2.0, but not in 1.3). I found it interesting that you retained %c - I presume this means that %c continues to work until mod_ssl replaces it's meaning? Bill At 02:16 PM 11/20/2003, you wrote:

Re: [PATCH] 1.3: Add %X as alias for %c in LogFormat

2003-11-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: +1 for 1.3 - we made this change already for 2.0 when we encountered the problem (as we ship mod_ssl in 2.0, but not in 1.3). I found it interesting that you retained %c - I presume this means that %c continues to work until mod_ssl replaces it's meaning?

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Nov 19 23:45:14 EST 2003

2003-11-20 Thread Andr Malo
* Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: * Replace some of the mutex locking in the worker MPM with atomic operations for higher concurrency. server/mpm/worker/fdqueue.c 1.24, 1.25 +1: brianp Is anyone working on this right now? If

Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99

2003-11-20 Thread gregames
making public per Madhu MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: I'm using 2.0.48 and also back-ported the cgid-restart patch to 2.0.48. I got a little further on the issue : The Apache hang is definitely caused by the cgid exiting. cgid should _never_ exit without something in the error

Re: [PATCH] NO_USE_SIGACTION - no use undecorated names

2003-11-20 Thread Jeff Trawick
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: We need to axe or decorate the symbol NO_USE_SIGACTION in our ongoing effort to prevent namespace clashes. sounds good We do have a flag APR_HAVE_SIGACTION which is tested and configured for, and the attached patch to the Apache MPMs presumes that this was the intent

Re: [PATCH] NO_USE_SIGACTION - no use undecorated names

2003-11-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 09:00 PM 11/20/2003, Jeff Trawick wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: We need to axe or decorate the symbol NO_USE_SIGACTION in our ongoing effort to prevent namespace clashes. sounds good We do have a flag APR_HAVE_SIGACTION which is tested and configured for, and the attached patch to the

Include Directive using CDSL's on Tru64 Cluster

2003-11-20 Thread Loveridge, Shanon
I am running a Tru64 Cluster and I believe there is a design conflict between the error checking in the code for the Include directive and Cluster application set up on Tru64. For people who are not familiar with Tru64 clustering there is a feature called a CDSL (Context Dependant